Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Modeling honeybee communication using network of spiking neural networks to simulate nectar reporting behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the findings of the research that attempted to mathematically model the cognitive behavior that could arise due to the interaction between honeybees in a colony during forager recruitment process. The model defines a honeybee as a spiking neural network, and colony as a network of spiking neural networks. The proposed mathematical model has been evaluated by analyzing the cognitive behavior generated by the main network which represents honeybees’ interaction as interactions of component networks (i.e. spiking neural networks). Accordingly, behavior of the component network, that represents an unemployed forager in the colony, was examined under different scenarios by setting networks’ parameters to simulate ecological situations in the colony. The reporting of different level of quantity of nectar sources by scouts to the colony, an attempt made by a scout to attract more unemployed foragers for foraging, and influence by dancing foragers to attract other unemployed foragers for foraging are those ecological colony states that have been tested in this research. The results of all these cases have supported that the proposed mathematical model can sufficiently simulate the unemployed forager’s behavior during recruitment process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Trianni V, Tusi E (2011) Swarm cognition and artificial life, advances in artificial life. Darwin meets von Neumann. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5778:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed H, Glasgow J 2012 Swarm intelligence: concepts, models and applications. Technical Report 2012-585, School of Computing, Queen’s University, Canada

  3. Blum C (2005) Ant colony optimization: Introduction and recent trends. Phys Life Rev 2:353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karaboga D, Akay B (2009) A survey: algorithms simulating bee swarm intelligence. Artif Intell Rev 31(1):68–85

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krink T Swarm intelligence—introduction, EVALife Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus

  6. Myerscough MR (2003) Dancing for a decision: a matrix model for nest-site choice by honeybees. Proc R Soc Lond 270(1515):577–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bailis P, Nagpal R, Werfel J (2010) Positional Communication and Private Information in Honeybee Foraging Models. In: Dorigo M. et al. (eds) Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trianni V, Tusi E, Passino EM, Marshell JAR (2011) Swarm cognition: an interdisciplinary approach to the study of self-organizing biological collectives. Swarm Intell 5:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernando S, Kumarasinghe N (2015) Modeling a honeybee using spiking neural network to simulate nectar reporting behavior. Int J Comput Appl 130–138:33–39  

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gil M (2010) Reward expectations in honeybees. Commun Integr Biol 3(2):95–100  

  11. Seeley TD, Mikheyev AS, Pagano GJ (2000) Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability. J Comp Physiol [A] 186(9):813–819  

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yahya H (2007) The miracle of the Honeybee. Ch. 2–3, Global Publishing

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thom C (2003) The tremble dance of honey bees can be caused by hive-external foraging experience. J Exp Biol 206(Pt 13):2111–2116  

  14. Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31(6):375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Passino KM, Seeley TD (2006) Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: the speed and accuracy trade-off. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59(3):427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bressan JMA, Benz M, Oettler J, Heinze J, Hartenstein V, Sprecher SG (2014) A map of brain neuropils and fiber systems in the ant Cardiocondyla obscurior. Front Neuroanat 8:166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees: a comparative study. Harvard Univ. Press., Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tautz J, Maier S, Groh C, Rossler W, Brockmann A (2003) Behavioral performance in adult honey bees is influenced by the temperature experienced during their pupal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(12):7343–7347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinakevitch I, Mustard JA, Smith BH (2011) Distribution of the octopamine receptor AmOA1 in the honey bee brain. PLoS One 6(1):e14536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Izhikevich EM (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(6):1569–1572

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernando S (2014) Modeling function of nectar foraging of honeybees using operant conditioning. Int J Comput Appl 104:45–51  

  22. Quintavalle A (2013) Voltage-gated calcium channels in honey bees: physiological roles and potential targets for insecticides. BioSciences Master Reviews pp 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Perk CG, Mercer AR (2006) Dopamine modulation of honey bee (Apis mellifera) antennal-lobe neurons. J Neurophysiol 95:1147–1157  

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fernando S, Yamada K, Marasinghe A (2011) Observed stent’s anti-hebbian postulate on dynamic stochastic computational synapses. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Network, pp. 1336–1343  

    Google Scholar 

  25. Abbott LF, Nelson SB 2000 Synaptic Plasticity: taming the beast. Neuroscience 3:1178–1183  

  26. Izhikevich EM (2007) Dynamical systems in neuroscience: the geometry of excitability and bursting. Ch 8, MIT Press  

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computational Mathematics, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka

    Subha Fernando

  2. Centre of Behavioral Neuroscience and Computation, General Sir John Kotelawala Defense University, Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Nishantha Kumarasinghe

Authors
  1. Subha Fernando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nishantha Kumarasinghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subha Fernando.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernando, S., Kumarasinghe, N. Modeling honeybee communication using network of spiking neural networks to simulate nectar reporting behavior. Artif Life Robotics 23, 241–248 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-017-0418-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-017-0418-6

Keywords