Skip to main content
Log in

Biomimetic microfluidic neurons for bio-hybrid experiments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide have incurable and debilitating conditions called neurodegenerative diseases that influence one’s cognitive and/or motor functions. There is currently an increasing number of neuroprosthesis, but they have power consumption and bio-compatibility issues. To bring neuroprosthesis into realization and for future long-term replacement of damaged brain areas with artificial devices, understanding of neurophysiological behaviors and investigations on the interaction of neuronal cell assemblies is essential. To circumvent the limitations, in this article we propose a biomimetic artificial neuron to mimic and/or to replace the biological neurons. This biomimetic neuron is based on microfluidic technique with ionic exchange capable of performing bio-hybrid experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicolelis MAL, Lebedev MA (2009) Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain-machine interfaces. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:530–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP (2006) Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 442:164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hochberg LR et al (2012) Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nat Methods 485:372–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Potter SM (2010) Closing the loop between neurons and neurotechnology. Front Neurosci 4:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levi T, Bonifazi P, Massobrio P, Chiappalone M (2018) Closed-loop systems for next-generation neuroprostheses. Front Neurosci 12:26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonifazi P et al (2013) In vitro large-scale experimental and theoretical studies for the realization of bi-directional brain-prostheses. Front Neural Circ 7:40

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joucla S et al (2016) Generation of locomotor-like activity in the isolated rat spinal cord using intraspinal electrical microstimulation driven by a digital neuromorphic CPG. Front Neurosci 10:67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Indiveri G et al (2001) Neuromorphic silicon neuron circuits. Front Neurosci 5:73

    Google Scholar 

  9. Levi T, Lewis N, Tomas J, Saighi S, Renaud S, Bornat Y, Alvado L (2008) Neuromimetic integrated circuits, VLSI circuits for biomedical applications, Iniewski Editor

  10. Henrich-Noack P et al (2017) Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage. Sci Rep 7:627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pudenz RH, Agnew WF, Bullara LA (1977) Effects of electrical stimulation of brain. Brain Behav Evol 14:103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahowald M, Douglas R (1991) A silicon neuron. Nature 354:515–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Masson G, Renaud-Le Masson S, Debay D, Bal T (2002) Feedback inhibition controls spike transfer in hybrid thalamic circuits. Nature 417:854–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ambroise M, Levi T, Joucla S, Yvert B, Saïghi S (2013) Real-time biomimetic central pattern generators in an FPGA for hybrid experiments. Front Neurosci 7:215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Levi T, Fujii T (2016) Microfluidic neurons, a new way in neuromorphic engineering? Micromachines 7:146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Unger MA, Chou HP, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake SR (2000) Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288(5463):113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brewer GJ, Torricelli JR, Evege EK, Price PJ (1993) Optimized survival of hippocampal neurons in B27-supplemented Neurobasal, a new serum-free medium combination. J Neurosci Res 35:567–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ambroise M, Bucceli S, Grassia F, Pirog A, Bornat Y, Chiappalone M, Levi T (2017) Biomimetic neural network for modifying biological dynamics during hybrid experiments. J Artif Life Robot 22(3):398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grassia F, Kohno T, Levi T (2016) Digital hardware implementation of a stochastic two-dimensional neuron model. J Physiol Paris 110(4):409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ambroise M, Levi T, Bornat Y, Saighi S (2013) Biorealistic spiking neural network on FPGA. In: IEEE CISS 2013, Baltimore, US

  21. Kawada J, Kaneda S, Kirihara T, Maroof A, Levi T, Eggan K, Fujii T, Ikeuchi Y (2017) Generation of a motor nerve organoid with human stem cell-derived neurons. Stem Cell Rep 9(5):1441–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothée Levi.

Additional information

This work was presented in part at the 23rd International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Beppu, Oita, January 18–20, 2018.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishikawa, S.M., Kim, S.H., Luo, Z. et al. Biomimetic microfluidic neurons for bio-hybrid experiments. Artif Life Robotics 23, 402–408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0452-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0452-z

Keywords

Navigation