Abstract
The problem that old people are sometimes deceived by means of remittance fraud has become a great concern in our society. In this paper, we consider deceived person’s thinking using Barwise–Seligman’s framework, which is a logic for representing distributed systems among people or artifacts. The framework has been used to consider the conversation with comical misconception. We think that it is similar to remittance fraud because in telephone conversation, a criminal of the fraud uses victim’s misconception so that the criminal can impersonate somebody. In this paper, we consider a logical system to describe the communication of a typical remittance fraud, and discuss the representative ability of the formulas to express the situation where a person is deceived or not deceived. The formulas have indicated that a person may be deceived as a result of handling exceptions in terms of logic. This paper contributes to providing a novel viewpoint to consider why people are deceived.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
They also took up the constraints of the form \(\alpha , \gamma \vdash\) mentioned later.
References
Pattanaphanchai J, O’Hara K, Hall W (2013) Trustworthiness criteria for supporting users to assess the credibility of web information. In: Companion Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’13), pp.1123–1130
Medvet E, Kirda E, Kruegel C (2008) Visual-similarity-based phishing detection. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm’08), Article No. 22, 8pages
Everett RM, Nurse JRC, Erola A (2016) The anatomy of online deception: what makes automated text convincing? In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’16), pp.1115–1120
Dhamija R, Tygar J, Hearst M (2006) Why phishing works. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06), pp.581–590
Barwise J, Seligman J (1997) Information flow -the logic of distributed systems. Cambridge Tracks in Theoretical Computer Science 44, paperback. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Patitad P, Suto H (2015) A modeling of collaboration mechanism of design process based on channel theory. Journal of Robotics, Networking and Artificial Life, Vol. 2, No.1, pp.46–49
Motoyosh T, Hattori T, Kawakami H, Shiose T, Katai O (2008) A mathematical framework for interpreting playing environments as media for information flow. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, London, 7pages
Motoyoshi T, Kawakami H, Shiose T, Katai O (2009) Formal concept analysis of musicians’ awareness for musical expression. In: Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Science of Music (ESCOM 2009), pp.362–365
Kawakami H, Suto H, Handa H, Katai O, Shiose T (2008) Analyzing diverse interpretation as benefit of inconvenience. In: The 2nd International Symposium on Symbiotic Nuclear Power Systems for 21st Century (ISSNP2008), pp.75-81
Kawakami H, Nishitani K, Shiose T, Katai O (2008) Mathmatical analysis for benefit of diverse interpretation (in Japanese). In: 35th SICE symposium on intelligent systems, Japan, 6pages
Nagamine M, Hara S, Nobuhara Y (2009) Bank transfer fraud: a neuroscientific approach (in Japanese). Sociotechnica, Vol. 6, pp.177–186
Yamasaki Y, Naka M, Ishizaki C, Sato T (2014) Effects of elderly people’s cognitive aspects coming from trust to self and others on being deceived (in Japanese). Ritsumeikan Journal of Human Sciences, No.29, pp.3–17
Pereira MS, de Lange J, Shahid S, Swerts M (2016) Children’s facial expressions in truthful and deceptive interactions with a virtual agent. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (HAI’16), pp.289–296
Shafqat W, Lee S, Malik S, Kim HC (2016) The Language of deceivers: linguistic features of crowdfunding scams. In: Companion Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (WWW’16), pp 99–100
Toma CL, Hancock JT (2010) Reading between the lines: linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’10), pp.5-8
Ono H (1994) Jyouhoukagaku ni okeru ronri (Logic in information science [Translated from Japanese]). Nippon hyoron sya, Tokyo
Shimojima A (1998) What we can do with channel theory (in Japanese). Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems, Vol.10, No.5, pp.775–784
Kawakami H, Mishima H, Shiose T, Okada M (2004) Play and their equipments as interfaces (in Japanese). The Transactions of Human Interface Society, Vol.6, No.4, pp.351–360
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof. Hiroshi Kawakami, Kyoto University, for his helpful comments on Barwise–Seligman’s framework.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was presented in part at the 23rd International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Beppu, Oita, January 18–20, 2018. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research(S) Number JP16H06302.
About this article
Cite this article
Myojin, S., Babaguchi, N. A logical consideration on deceived person’s thinking. Artif Life Robotics 24, 114–118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0465-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-018-0465-7