Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Two extensions of heterogeneous boid model to avoid metastable patterns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A boid is a simple multiagent model of animal group behavior. Boid agents communicate locally. I studied a heterogeneous boid model comprised of many agents that are divided into several types. While varying interaction among types of agents, this model generates stable patterns with a symmetric interface among different types of agents. As the number of agents increases and as agent clusters grow larger, this model forms a metastable pattern (i.e., a complex of such stable patterns) that is caused by conflict among the local growths of stable patterns. To avoid metastable patterns, I designed two extended heterogeneous boid models: a two-component boid with noise control and a three-component boid with a type transition of agents. In this paper, I examined how these extended models rearrange agents from metastable patterns into stable patterns. These extended models generate stable patterns regardless of the agent number in a shorter time than the original heterogeneous boid model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Nakamura M (2019) Two extensions of heterogeneous boid model. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (SWARM 2019), Okinawa Japan, 20–22 Nov 2019, pp 140–146

  2. Nakamura M, Kurumatani K (2005) A method for designing ant colony models and two examples of its application. Adv Artif Life 3630:530–539 (Springer, LNAI)

  3. Nakamura M (2015) Formation of interfaces in heterogeneous boid models. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (SWARM 2015), Kyoto Japan, 28–30 Oct 2015, pp 66–73

  4. Sakai S, Suzuki R (1972) A model of the schooling of fishes (In Japanese). The Institute of Electronics and Communication Engineers of Japan (IECE), MBE

  5. Sakai S, Suzuki R (1973) A model for group structure and its behavior (In Japanese). The Institute of Electronics and Communication Engineers of Japan (IECE), MBE

  6. Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Comput Graph 21(4):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Couzin I et al (2002) Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J Theor Biol 218:1–11

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Vicsek T et al (1995) Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys Rev Lett 75(6):1226–1229

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Olfati-Saber R (2006) Flocking for multi-agent dynamics systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Trans Autom Control 51(3):401–420

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Brambilla M et al (2013) Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intell 7(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vicsek T, Zafeiris A (2012) Collective motion. Phys Rep 517:71–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sayama H (2007) Decentralized control and interactive design methods for large-scale heterogeneous self-organizing swarms. Adv Artif Life 4648:675–684 (Springer, LNAI)

  13. Doursat R (2008) Programmable architectures that are complex and self-organized: from morphogenesis to engineering. ALIFE XI, pp 181–188

  14. You SK et al (2009) Collective behaviors of two-component swarms. J Theor Biol 261:494–500

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar M et al (2010) Segregation of heterogeneous units in a swarm of robotic agents. IEEE Trans Autom Control 55(3):743–748

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industry and Technology (AIST), Osaka, Japan

    Mari Nakamura

Authors
  1. Mari Nakamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari Nakamura.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was presented in part at the 3rd International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (Okinawa, Japan, November 20-22, 2019).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakamura, M. Two extensions of heterogeneous boid model to avoid metastable patterns. Artif Life Robotics 25, 578–587 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-020-00652-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-020-00652-0

Keywords