Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Generating collective wall-jumping behavior for a robotic swarm with self-teaching automatic curriculum learning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Swarm robotics (SR) is a research field about how to design a large number of robots so that they can generate meaningful collective behaviors. One of the promising approaches in designing a control policy is reinforcement learning (RL). However, it is well known that the sparse reward problem may arise, especially in cases of solving highly complex problems. Curriculum learning (CL) can be one of the effective approaches to overcoming this difficulty. In this paper, we propose a novel method called Self-Teaching Automatic Curriculum Learning (STACL). The training progress of different lessons is compared by agents to determine which lesson should be trained in the next episode. The collective wall-jumping task, in which the robots have to generate collective wall-jumping behavior to jump over the high wall and reach the goal as soon as possible, is employed to illustrate the effects. Simulation results show that the proposed approach has the fastest convergence speed and the most stable performance. In addition, we also conducted experiments to examine the flexibility of the developed controllers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Şahin E (2004) Swarm robotics: from sources of inspiration to domains of application. In: International workshop on swarm robotics. Springer, pp 10–20

  2. Seeley TD, Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28(4):277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayındır L (2016) A review of swarm robotics tasks. Neurocomputing 172:292–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Francesca G, Brambilla M, Trianni V, Dorigo M, Birattari M (2012) Analysing an evolved robotic behaviour using a biological model of collegial decision making. In: Ziemke T, Balkenius C, Hallam J (eds) From animals to animats 12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 381–390

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Groß R, Dorigo M (2009) Towards group transport by swarms of robots. Int J Bio-Inspir Comput 1:01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hiraga M, Yasuda T, Ohkura K (2018) Evolutionary acquisition of autonomous specialization in a path-formation task of a robotic swarm. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform 22(5):621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gu S, Holly E, Lillicrap T, Levine S (2017) Deep reinforcement learning for robotic manipulation with asynchronous off-policy updates. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 3389–3396. IEEE

  8. Kober J, Bagnell JA, Peters J (2013) Reinforcement learning in robotics: a survey. Int J Rob Res 32(11):1238–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hüttenrauch M, Adrian S, Neumann G et al (2019) Deep reinforcement learning for swarm systems. J Mach Learn Res 20(54):1–31

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bengio Y, Louradour J, Collobert R, Weston J (2009) Curriculum learning. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning, pp 41–48

  11. Wang X, Chen Y, Zhu W (2021) A survey on curriculum learning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 44:4555–4576

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen D, Chen K, Zhang Z, Zhang B (2015) Mechanism of locust air posture adjustment. J Bionic Eng 12(3):418–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Noh M, Kim S-W, An S, Koh J-S, Cho K-J (2012) Flea-inspired catapult mechanism for miniature jumping robots. IEEE Trans Rob 28(5):1007–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Romanishin JW, Gilpin K, Rus D (2013) M-blocks: momentum-driven, magnetic modular robots. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp 4288–4295. IEEE

  15. Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Rusu AA, Veness J, Bellemare MG, Graves A, Riedmiller M, Fidjeland AK, Ostrovski G et al (2015) Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518(7540):529–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kulkarni TD, Narasimhan K, Saeedi A, Tenenbaum J (2016) Hierarchical deep reinforcement learning: integrating temporal abstraction and intrinsic motivation. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 29

  17. Duan Y, Chen X, Houthooft R, Schulman J, Abbeel P (2016) Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control. In: International conference on machine learning, pp 1329–1338. PMLR

  18. Matiisen T, Oliver A, Cohen T, Schulman J (2017) Teacher-student curriculum learning

  19. Portelas R, Colas C, Weng L, Hofmann K, Oudeyer P-Y (2020) Automatic curriculum learning for deep RL: a short survey. CoRR, abs/2003.04664

  20. Ivanovic B, Harrison J, Sharma A, Chen M, Pavone M (2018) Backward reachability curriculum for robotic reinforcement learning, Barc

  21. Salimans T, Chen R (2018) Learning Montezuma’s revenge from a single demonstration. CoRR

  22. Schulman J, Wolski F, Dhariwal P, Radford A, Klimov O (2017) Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Initiative for Realizing Diversity in the Research Environment (Specific Correspondence Type).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan

    Xiaotong Nie, Yupeng Liang, Ziyao Han & Kazuhiro Ohkura

Authors
  1. Xiaotong Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yupeng Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ziyao Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kazuhiro Ohkura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaotong Nie.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

SWARM Special Issue: This work was presented in part at the joint symposium of the 27th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, the 7th International Symposium on BioComplexity, and the 5th International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (Online, January 25–27, 2022).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nie, X., Liang, Y., Han, Z. et al. Generating collective wall-jumping behavior for a robotic swarm with self-teaching automatic curriculum learning. Artif Life Robotics 28, 67–75 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-022-00833-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-022-00833-z

Keywords