Abstract
To help ease the caregiving burden that comes with population aging, we proposed a bistable control system for walking-assist robots in which the transition between two stable control modes is governed using a compliance-controlled handle. The first modeis where the robot takes the role of the leader and operates autonomously by following a target person. Whereas in the second mode, the user is the leader, and the robot follows the intent of the user. In these two stable control modes, because either the leader or the robot is fully in control, there is minimal conflict of intent, thereby reducing physical and cognitive load of the user as well as minimizing competition between the intent of the user and that of the robot. When there is a conflict, the robot and the user express their intent physically by rotating the compliance-controlled handle. This compliance-controlled handle arbitrates between the user’s and the robot’s intent and decides whether to transition to a different stable control mode (switching roles) depending on the angle rotated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
United Nations (2020) Department of economic and social affairs, and population division. World Population Ageing, 2019 Highlights. United Nations. ISBN 978-92-1-148325-3
Ribeiro O, Araújo L, Figueiredo D, Paúl C, Teixeira L (2022) The caregiver support ratio in Europe: estimating the future of potentially (un)available caregivers. Healthcare 10 (1):11. ISSN 2227-9032. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010011
Lopez-Hartmann M, Wens J, Verhoeven V, Remmen R (2012) The effect of caregiver support interventions for informal caregivers of community-dwelling frail elderly: a systematic review. Int J Integrat Care 12:e133. ISSN 1568–4156. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.845
Marasinghe KM (2016) Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 11(5):353–360. ISSN 1748–3107:1748–3115. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1087061
Orellano-Colón E, Jutai J, Santiago A, Torres V, Benítez K, Torres M (2016) Assistive technology needs and measurement of the psychosocial impact of assistive technologies for independent living of older hispanics: lessons learned. Technologies, 4(3):21. ISSN 2227-7080. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies4030021
Martins M, Santos C, Frizera A, Ceres R (2015) A review of the functionalities of smart walkers. Med Eng Phys 37(10):917–928. ISSN 13504533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.07.006
Yu H, Spenko M, Dubowsky S (2003) An adaptive shared control system for an intelligent mobility aid for the elderly. Autonom Robots 15(1):53–66. ISSN 1573-7527. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024488717009
Spenko M, Yu H, Dubowsky S (2006) robotic personal aids for mobility and monitoring for the elderly. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14(3):344–351. ISSN 1558-0210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881534
Galluppi F, Urdiales C, Poncela A, Sanchez-Tato I, Sandoval F, Olivetti Belardinelli M (2008) A study on human performance in a cooperative local navigation robotic system. In 2008 IEEE 17th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pages 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2008.16
Jiang S-Y, Lin C-Y, Huang K-T, Song K-T (2017) Shared control design of a walking-assistant robot. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 25(6):2143–2150. ISSN 1558-0865. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2016.2638879
Cunjun H, Wasson G, Alwan M, Sheth P, Ledoux A (2005) Shared navigational control and user intent detection in an intelligent walker. Caring Machines, In AAAI Fall Symposium
Hirata Y, Hara A, Kosuge K (2007) Motion control of passive intelligent walker using servo brakes. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):981–990. ISSN 1941-0468. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.906252
Frémy J, Ferland F, Lauria M, Michaud F (2014) Force-guidance of a compliant omnidirectional non-holonomic platform. Robot Autonom Syst 62(4):579–590. ISSN 0921-8890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.01.002
Jiménez M, Mello R, Bastos T, Frizera A (2020) Assistive locomotion device with haptic feedback for guiding visually impaired people. Med Eng Phys 80:18–25. ISSN 1350-4533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.04.002
Wasson G, Sheth P, Alwan M, Granata K, Ledoux A, Huang C (2003) User intent in a shared control framework for pedestrian mobility aids. In Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453), 3:2962–2967, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. IEEE. ISBN 978-0-7803-7860-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2003.1249321
McLachlan S, Arblaster J, Liu OK, Miro JV, Chenoweth L (2005) A multi-stage shared control method for an intelligent mobility assistant. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. ICORR 2005., pages 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501134
Lacey G, Rodriguez-Losada D (2008) The evolution of guido. IEEE Robot Autom Magaz 15(4):75–83. ISSN 1558-223X. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2008.929924
Yu K-T, Lam C-P,Chang M-F, Mou W-H, Tseng S-H, Fu L-C (2010) An interactive robotic walker for assisting elderly mobility in senior care unit. In 2010 IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts, pages 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2010.5679631
Mou W-H, Chang M-F, Liao C-K, Hsu Y-H, Tseng S-H, Fu L-C (2012) Context-aware assisted interactive robotic walker for Parkinson’s disease patients. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385791
Graf B, Schraft R (2007) Behavior-based path modification for shared control of robotic walking Aids. In 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pages 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428444
Sierra SD, Molina JF, Gómez DA, Múnera MC, Cifuentes CA (2018) Development of an interface for human-robot interaction on a robotic platform for gait assistance: AGoRA smart walker. In 2018 IEEE ANDESCON, pages 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2018.8564594
Sierra SD, Garzón M, Múnera M, Cifuentes CA (2019) Human–robot–environment interaction interface for smart walker assisted gait: AGoRA walker. Sensors 19(13):2897. ISSN 1424-8220. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132897
Quigley M, Gerkey B, Conley K, Faust J, Foote T, Leibs J, Berger E, Wheeler R, Ng A (2009) ROS: An open-source robot operating system. Pages 6
Redmon J, Farhadi A (2017) YOLO9000: Better, faster, stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 7263–7271
Losey Dylan P, McDonald Craig G, Battaglia Edoardo, O’Malley Marcia K (2018) A review of intent detection, arbitration, and communication aspects of shared control for physical human-robot interaction. Appl Mechan Rev 70(1):010804. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039145
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP19K04296, 21K17791, and 21H04898.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was presented in part at the joint symposium of the 27th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, the 7th International Symposium on BioComplexity, and the 5th International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (Online, January 25–27, 2022).
About this article
Cite this article
Yeoh, W.L., Miyata, R., Fukuda, O. et al. Development of a person-following robotic assist walker with compliant-control arbitrated role-switching. Artif Life Robotics 28, 553–559 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00864-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00864-0