Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a person-following robotic assist walker with compliant-control arbitrated role-switching

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To help ease the caregiving burden that comes with population aging, we proposed a bistable control system for walking-assist robots in which the transition between two stable control modes is governed using a compliance-controlled handle. The first modeis where the robot takes the role of the leader and operates autonomously by following a target person. Whereas in the second mode, the user is the leader, and the robot follows the intent of the user. In these two stable control modes, because either the leader or the robot is fully in control, there is minimal conflict of intent, thereby reducing physical and cognitive load of the user as well as minimizing competition between the intent of the user and that of the robot. When there is a conflict, the robot and the user express their intent physically by rotating the compliance-controlled handle. This compliance-controlled handle arbitrates between the user’s and the robot’s intent and decides whether to transition to a different stable control mode (switching roles) depending on the angle rotated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations (2020) Department of economic and social affairs, and population division. World Population Ageing, 2019 Highlights. United Nations. ISBN 978-92-1-148325-3

  2. Ribeiro O, Araújo L, Figueiredo D, Paúl C, Teixeira L (2022) The caregiver support ratio in Europe: estimating the future of potentially (un)available caregivers. Healthcare 10 (1):11. ISSN 2227-9032. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010011

  3. Lopez-Hartmann M, Wens J, Verhoeven V, Remmen R (2012) The effect of caregiver support interventions for informal caregivers of community-dwelling frail elderly: a systematic review. Int J Integrat Care 12:e133. ISSN 1568–4156. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.845

  4. Marasinghe KM (2016) Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 11(5):353–360. ISSN 1748–3107:1748–3115. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1087061

  5. Orellano-Colón E, Jutai J, Santiago A, Torres V, Benítez K, Torres M (2016) Assistive technology needs and measurement of the psychosocial impact of assistive technologies for independent living of older hispanics: lessons learned. Technologies, 4(3):21. ISSN 2227-7080. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies4030021

  6. Martins M, Santos C, Frizera A, Ceres R (2015) A review of the functionalities of smart walkers. Med Eng Phys 37(10):917–928. ISSN 13504533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.07.006

  7. Yu H, Spenko M, Dubowsky S (2003) An adaptive shared control system for an intelligent mobility aid for the elderly. Autonom Robots 15(1):53–66. ISSN 1573-7527. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024488717009

  8. Spenko M, Yu H, Dubowsky S (2006) robotic personal aids for mobility and monitoring for the elderly. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14(3):344–351. ISSN 1558-0210. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881534

  9. Galluppi F, Urdiales C, Poncela A, Sanchez-Tato I, Sandoval F, Olivetti Belardinelli M (2008) A study on human performance in a cooperative local navigation robotic system. In 2008 IEEE 17th Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pages 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2008.16

  10. Jiang S-Y, Lin C-Y, Huang K-T, Song K-T (2017) Shared control design of a walking-assistant robot. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 25(6):2143–2150. ISSN 1558-0865. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2016.2638879

  11. Cunjun H, Wasson G, Alwan M, Sheth P, Ledoux A (2005) Shared navigational control and user intent detection in an intelligent walker. Caring Machines, In AAAI Fall Symposium

  12. Hirata Y, Hara A, Kosuge K (2007) Motion control of passive intelligent walker using servo brakes. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):981–990. ISSN 1941-0468. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2007.906252

  13. Frémy J, Ferland F, Lauria M, Michaud F (2014) Force-guidance of a compliant omnidirectional non-holonomic platform. Robot Autonom Syst 62(4):579–590. ISSN 0921-8890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.01.002

  14. Jiménez M, Mello R, Bastos T, Frizera A (2020) Assistive locomotion device with haptic feedback for guiding visually impaired people. Med Eng Phys 80:18–25. ISSN 1350-4533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.04.002

  15. Wasson G, Sheth P, Alwan M, Granata K, Ledoux A, Huang C (2003) User intent in a shared control framework for pedestrian mobility aids. In Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453), 3:2962–2967, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. IEEE. ISBN 978-0-7803-7860-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2003.1249321

  16. McLachlan S, Arblaster J, Liu OK, Miro JV, Chenoweth L (2005) A multi-stage shared control method for an intelligent mobility assistant. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. ICORR 2005., pages 426–429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501134

  17. Lacey G, Rodriguez-Losada D (2008) The evolution of guido. IEEE Robot Autom Magaz 15(4):75–83. ISSN 1558-223X. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2008.929924

  18. Yu K-T, Lam C-P,Chang M-F, Mou W-H, Tseng S-H, Fu L-C (2010) An interactive robotic walker for assisting elderly mobility in senior care unit. In 2010 IEEE workshop on advanced robotics and its social impacts, pages 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2010.5679631

  19. Mou W-H, Chang M-F, Liao C-K, Hsu Y-H, Tseng S-H, Fu L-C (2012) Context-aware assisted interactive robotic walker for Parkinson’s disease patients. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 329–334. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385791

  20. Graf B, Schraft R (2007) Behavior-based path modification for shared control of robotic walking Aids. In 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pages 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428444

  21. Sierra SD, Molina JF, Gómez DA, Múnera MC, Cifuentes CA (2018) Development of an interface for human-robot interaction on a robotic platform for gait assistance: AGoRA smart walker. In 2018 IEEE ANDESCON, pages 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2018.8564594

  22. Sierra SD, Garzón M, Múnera M, Cifuentes CA (2019) Human–robot–environment interaction interface for smart walker assisted gait: AGoRA walker. Sensors 19(13):2897. ISSN 1424-8220. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19132897

  23. Quigley M, Gerkey B, Conley K, Faust J, Foote T, Leibs J, Berger E, Wheeler R, Ng A (2009) ROS: An open-source robot operating system. Pages 6

  24. Redmon J, Farhadi A (2017) YOLO9000: Better, faster, stronger. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 7263–7271

  25. Losey Dylan P, McDonald Craig G, Battaglia Edoardo, O’Malley Marcia K (2018) A review of intent detection, arbitration, and communication aspects of shared control for physical human-robot interaction. Appl Mechan Rev 70(1):010804. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP19K04296, 21K17791, and 21H04898.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen Liang Yeoh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was presented in part at the joint symposium of the 27th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, the 7th International Symposium on BioComplexity, and the 5th International Symposium on Swarm Behavior and Bio-Inspired Robotics (Online, January 25–27, 2022).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeoh, W.L., Miyata, R., Fukuda, O. et al. Development of a person-following robotic assist walker with compliant-control arbitrated role-switching. Artif Life Robotics 28, 553–559 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00864-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-023-00864-0

Keywords

Navigation