Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of virtual metrology performance by removing metrology noises in a training dataset

  • Industrial and Commercial Application
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtual metrology (VM) has been applied to semiconductor manufacturing processes for the quality management of wafers. However, noises included in training datasets degrade the performance of VM, which is a key obstacle to the application of VM in real-world semiconductor manufacturing processes. In this paper, we develop a VM dataset construction method by identifying and removing noises. We define noises by considering both input and output variables and classify noises into fault detection and classification (FDC) noises and metrology noises, which have abnormal FDC variables and normal metrology variables, and normal FDC variables and abnormal metrology variables, respectively. We propose the construction of a VM training dataset including FDC noises and excluding metrology noises. By employing novelty detection methods, the normal/abnormal regions of FDC variables are identified. In experiments conducted on a real-world photolithography (photo) data, VM models trained with the dataset constructed by the proposed method showed the best accuracy and the most robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang P, Lee H, Cho S, Kim D, Park J, Park C, Doh S (2009) A virtual metrology system for semiconductor manufacturing. Expert Syst Appl 36:12554–12561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kourti T, MacGregor JF (1995) Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivatiate projection methods. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 28:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qin SJ (2003) Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond. J Chemom 17:480–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin SJ, Cherry G, Good R, Wang J, Harrison CA (2006) Semiconductor manufacturing process control and monitoring: a fab-wide framework. J Process Control 16:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Su AJ, Jeng JC, Huang HP, Yu CC, Hung SY, Chao CK (2007) Control relevant issues in semiconductor manufacturing: overview with some new results. Control Eng Pract 15:1268–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng J, Cheng FT (2005) Application developmetn to virtual metrology in semiconductor industry. The 32nd annual conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, USA, pp 124–129

  7. Chang YJ, Kang Y, Hsu CL, Chang CT, Chan TY (2006) Virtual metrology technique for semiconductor manufacturing. International joint conference on neural networks, Vancouver, pp 5289–5293

  8. Chen P, Wu S, Lin J, Ko F, Lo H, Wang J, Yu W, Liang MS (2005) Virtual metrology: a solution for wafer to wafer advanced process control. IEEE international symposium on semiconductor manufacturing, USA, pp 155–157

  9. Besnard J, Toprac A (2006) Wafer-to-wafer virtual metrology applied to run-to-run control. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ISMI symposium on manufacturing effectiveness, USA

  10. Kang P, Kim D, Lee H, Doh S, Cho S (2011) Virtual metrology for run-to-run control in semiconductor manufacturing. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):2508–2522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim D, Kang P, Cho S, Lee H, Doh S (2012) Machine learning-based novelty detection for faulty wafer detection in semiconductor manufacturing. Expert Syst Appl 39(4):4075–4083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su YC, Lin TH, Cheng FT, Wu WM (2008) Accuracy and real-time considerations for implementing various virtual metrology algorithms. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 21(3):426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin TH, Cheng FT, Wu WM, Kao CA, Ye AJ, Chang FC (2009) NN-based key-variable selection method for enhancing virtual metrology accuracy. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 22(1):204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandola V, Banerjee A, Kumar V (2007) Outlier detection: a survey. Technical Report of University of Minnesota, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM (1987) Robust regression and outlier detection. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng D, Spanos CJ (2009) Virtual metrology modeling for plasma etch operations. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 22(4):419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He Z, Deng S, Xu X (2002) Outlier detection integrating semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on advances in web-age information management, Springer, London, pp 126–131

  18. Mitchell M (1996) An introduction to genetic algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang J, Honavar V (1998) Feature Subset Selection Using a Genetic Algorithm. IEEE Intell Syst 13(2):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tax DMJ (2001) One-class classification. Ph.D. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Netherland

  21. Barnett V, Lewis T (1994) Outliers in statistical data. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jolliffe IT (1986) Principal component analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2002) The element of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kohonen T (1995) Self-organizing maps. Springer series in information science, vol 30. Springer, Berlin

  26. Tax DMJ, Duin RPW (1999) Support vector domain description. Pattern Recognit Lett 20(11–13):1191–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1998) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

  28. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ (1998) A tutorial on support vector regression. NeuroCOLT2 technical report NC2-TR-1998-030

  29. Kim D, Cho S (2012) Pattern selection for support vector regression-based response modeling. Expert Syst Appl 39(10):8975–8985

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 PLUS project in 2013, the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2011-0030814), the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (2011-0021893) and 2013 Seoul National University Brain Fusion Program Research Grant. This work was also supported by the Engineering Research Institute of SNU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongil Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, D., Kang, P., Lee, Sk. et al. Improvement of virtual metrology performance by removing metrology noises in a training dataset. Pattern Anal Applic 18, 173–189 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-013-0363-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-013-0363-5

Keywords

Navigation