Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

A two visual systems approach to understanding voice and gestural interaction

  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to consider the physiological and behavioral mechanisms that allow users to physically interact with virtual environments. Inspired by a neuroanatomical model of perception and action known as the two visual systems hypothesis, we conducted a study with two controlled experiments to compare four different kinds of spatial interaction: (1) voice-based input, (2) pointing with a visual cursor, (3) pointing without a visual cursor, and (4) pointing with a time-lagged visual cursor. Consistent with the two visual systems hypothesis, we found that voice-based input and pointing with a cursor were less robust to a display illusion known as the induced Roelofs effect than pointing without a cursor or even pointing with a lagged cursor. The implications of these findings are discussed, with an emphasis on how the two visual systems model can be used to understand the basis for voice and gestural interactions that support spatial target selection in large screen and immersive environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

VR:

Virtual reality

HCI:

Human–computer interaction

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CAD:

Computer-aided design

References

  1. Sutherland IE (1965) The ultimate display. Proc IFIP Cong 65:506–508

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolt RA (1980) “Put-that-there”: voice and gesture at the graphics interface. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), pp 262–270

  3. Oviatt SL Cohen PR (2000) Multimodal interfaces that process what comes naturally. Commun ACM 43(3):45–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trevarthen CB (1968) Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychol Forsch 31:299–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford Psychology Series 27. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bridgeman B, Peery S, Anand S (1997) Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Percept Psychophys 59(3):456–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Po BA, Fisher BD, Booth KS (2003) Pointing and visual feedback for spatial interaction in large-screen display environments. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on smart graphics, pp 22–38

  8. Roelofs C (1935) Optische localisation (Optical localization). Archiv für Augenheilkd 109:395–415

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider GE (1969) Two visual systems: brain mechanisms for localization and discrimination are dissociated by tectal and cortical lesions. Science 163:895–902

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin W (1982) Analysis of visual behaviour. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bridgeman B, Lewis S Heit, G, Nagle W (1979) Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 5:692–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A (1981) Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Percept Psychophys 29(4):336–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Michaels CF (2000) Information, perception, and action: what should ecological psychologists learn from Milner and Goodale (1995)?. Ecol Psychol 12(3):241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerzel D, Hommel B, Bekkering H (2001) A Simon effect induced by motion and location: evidence for a direct linkage of cognitive and motor maps. Percept Psychophys 63(5):862–874

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bridgeman B, Dassonville P, Bala J, Thiem P (2003) What is stored in the sensorimotor visual system: map or egocentric calibration?. In: Proceedings of the 3rd annual meeting of the vision sciences society, pp 10

  16. Po BA, Fisher BD, Booth KS (2004). Mouse and touchscreen selection in the upper and lower visual fields. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing (CHI), pp 359–366

  17. Luckiesh M (1965) Visual illusions: their causes, characteristics, and applications. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Myers BA, Bhatnagar R, Nichols J, Peck CH, Kong D, Miller R, Long AC (2002) Interacting a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing (CHI), pp 33–40

  19. Vicente KJ, Torenvliet GL (2000) The earth is spherical (p < 0.05): alternative methods of statistical inference. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 1(3):248–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, 201-2366 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    Barry A. Po, Brian D. Fisher & Kellogg S. Booth

Authors
  1. Barry A. Po
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian D. Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kellogg S. Booth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kellogg S. Booth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Po, B.A., Fisher, B.D. & Booth, K.S. A two visual systems approach to understanding voice and gestural interaction. Virtual Reality 8, 231–241 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-005-0156-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-005-0156-2

Keywords