Abstract
Of the five sensory channels—sight, sound, taste, smell, and touch, it is only our sense of touch that enables us to modify and manipulate the world around us. This article reports the preliminary findings of a systematic study investigating the efficacy of adding haptic feedback to a desktop virtual reality program for use in middle school science instruction. Current technology allows for the simulation of tactile and kinesthetic sensations via sophisticated haptic devices and a computer interface. This research, conducted with 80 middle school students, examined the cognitive and affective impact of this technology on students’ understandings of the structure and function of an animal cell. The results of this work offer valuable insights into the theoretical and practical considerations involved in the development and implementation of haptically augmented virtual reality instructional programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press, New York
Barbagli F, Salisbury K, Devengenzo R (2004) Toward virtual manipulation: from one point of contact to four. Sensor Rev 24(1):51–59
Brooks FP, Ouh-Young M, Batter JJ, Kilpatrick PJ (1990) Project GROPE-Haptic displays for scientific visualization. ACM Comput Graph 24(4):177–185
Dreyfus A, Jungwirth E (1989) The pupil and the living cell: a taxonomy of dysfunctional ideas about an abstract idea. J Biol Educ 23:49–55
Flores F, Tovar ME (2003) Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: an integrated view. Int J Sci Educ 25:269–286
Gliner JA, Morgan GA, Harmon RJ (2003) Pretest-posttest comparison group designs: Analysis and interpretation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 42:500–503
Hayward V, Oliver RA, Cruz-Hernandez M, Grant D, Robles-De-La-Torre G (2004) Haptic interfaces and devices. Sensor Rev 24(1):16–29
Kirschner PA (2002) Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learn Instruct 12(1):1–10
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Matula DE (1991) Imagined haptic exploration in judgments of object properties. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 17:314–322
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ, Matula DE (1993) Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:726–743
Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2004) Haptic identification of common objects: effects of constraining the manual exploration process. Percept Psychophys 66:618–628
McLaughlin M, Hespanha J, Sukhatme G (2002) Touch in virtual environments: haptics and the design of interactive systems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner PA, Kester L (2003) Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educ Psychol 38(1):5–13
Mikropoulos TA, Katsikis A, Nikolou E, Tsakalis P (2003) Virtual environments in biology teaching. J Biol Educ 37(4):176–181
National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington
Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory (2000) Accurate orientation information through a tactile sensory pathway in aerospace, land, and sea environments. Retrieved January 14, 2005. http://www.namrl.navy.mil/accel/tsas/body.htm
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (2004) Science standard course of study and grade level competencies. Retrieved July 18, 2004. http://www.ncpublicschools.org/curriculum/science/standard/
Pollock E, Chandler P, Sweller J (2002) Assimilating complex information. Learn Instruct 12(1):61–86
Reiner M (1999) Conceptual construction of fields through tactile interface. Interact Learn Environ 7(1):31–55
Rock I, Victor J (1964) Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143:594–596
Salisbury K, Brock D, Massie T, Swarup N, Zilles C (1995) Haptic rendering: programming touch interaction with virtual objects. In: Proceedings of ACM symposium on interactive 3D graphics, pp 123–130
Sathian K (1998) Perceptual learning. Curr Sci 75:451–456
Schnotz W (2002) Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educ Psychol Rev 14:101–120
Sensable Technologies, Phantom Desktop Haptic Device. http://www.sensable.com/products/phantom_ghost/phantom-desktop.asp
Srinivas K, Greene AJ, Easton RD (1997) Visual and tactile memory for 2-D patterns: effects of changes in size and left-right orientation. Psychon Bull Rev 4:535–540
Sweller J (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learn Instruct 4:295–312
Sweller J, van Merriënboer JJG, Paas FGWC (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 10:251–296
Tamir P, Zohar A (1991) Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Sci Educ 75:57–67
Tendick F, Downes M, Goktekin T, Cavusoglu MC, Feygin D, Wu X, Eyal R, Hegarty M, Way WL (2000) A virtual environment testbed for training laparoscopic surgical skills. Presence 9:236–255
Westbrook SL, Marek EA (1991) A cross-age study of the concept of diffusion. J Res Sci Teach 28:649–660
Williams RL, Chen M, Seaton JM (2003) Haptics-augmented simple-machine educational tools. J Sci Educ Technol 12(1):1–12
Winn W (2002) What can students learn in artificial environments that they cannot learn in class? Paper presented at the first international symposium, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minogue, J., Gail Jones, M., Broadwell, B. et al. The impact of haptic augmentation on middle school students’ conceptions of the animal cell. Virtual Reality 10, 293–305 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0052-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0052-4