Skip to main content
Log in

Overcoming the information overload problem in a multiform feedback-based virtual reality system for hand motion rehabilitation: healthy subject case study

  • SI: Cyberworlds09
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of composite multiple feedback in a newly proposed virtual reality system enables the patient to perceive similar real-world performance in the virtual world. However, it might cause information overload, which makes the patient feel confused and distracted during training. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of having separate function-specific feedback pre-training prior to the final multiform feedback task. During the evaluating tests with thirty healthy subjects, it has been found that effective pre-training set could overcome the problem in the main task. Minor modifications on the pre-training set could overcome or aggravate the problem, which indicates the importance of choosing the correct pre-training parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Polhemus Corp. (2005) 3space FASTRAK user’s manual. In: OPM00PI002, Rev.E, April 2005

  • Adamovich SV, Merians AS, Boian R, Lewis JA, Tremaine M, Burdea GS, Recce M, Poizner H (2005) A virtual reality-based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke. Presence 14(2):161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder SA, Moll CB, Wolf SL (1981) Evaluation of electromyographic biofeedback as an adjunct to therapeutic exercise in treating the lower extremities of hemiplegic patients. Phys Therapy 61:886–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Broeren J, Bjorkdahl A, Claesson L, Goude D, Lundgeren-Nilsson A, Samuelsson H, Blomstrand C, Sunnerhagen KS, Rydmark M (2008) Virtual rehabilitation after stroke. In: Andersen SK et al (eds) eHealth beyond the horizon. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdea GC, Coiffet P (2003) Virtual reality technology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YP, Huang H, Xu WW, Wallis RI, Sundaram H, Rikakis T, Ingalls T, Olson L, He JP (2006) The design of a real-time, multimodal biofeedback system for stroke patient rehabilitation. In: MM’06, Santa Barbara, California, USA

  • Crosbie JH, Lennon S, McGoldrick MC, McNeill MDJ, Burke JW, McDonough SM (2008) Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after hemiplegic stroke: a randomised pilot study. In: Proceedings of 7th ICDVRAT with ArtAbilitation, Maia, Portugal, pp 229–235

  • De Luca CJ (2002) Fundamental Concepts in EMG Signal Acquisition. Delsys Incorporated. http://www.delsys.com/Attachments_pdf/WP_Sampling1-4.pdf

  • Dursun E, Dursun N, Alican D (2004) Effects of biofeedback treatment on gait in children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 26(2):116–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund AJ, Cacioppo JT (1986a) Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology 23(5):567–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund AJ, Cacioppo JT (1986b) Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology 23(5):567–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton RE (1994) Introductory biological statistics. W. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA

  • Holden MK, Dyar T (2002) Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurol Rep 26:62–71

    Google Scholar 

  • XNA creators club online, http://creators.xna.com/en-GB/, 31/10/2009

  • Huang H, Wolf SL, He JP (2006) Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation: review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 3:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koritnik T, Bajd T, Munih M (2008) Virtual environment for lower-extremities training. Gait Posture 27:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S, Varley MR, Richards J, Shark L (2009) Overcoming the information overload problem in a multiform feedback based virtual reality system for hand motion rehabilitation. In: International conference on CyberWorlds, cw, pp 51–56

  • Norman GR, Streiner DL (2000) Biostatistics: the bare essentials, 2nd edn. B.C. Decker, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards J (2008) Biomechanics in clinic and research: an online interactive teaching and learning course. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JC, Yeh SC, Jung Y, Yoon H, Whitford M, Chen SY, Li L, McLaughlin M, Rizzo A, Winstein CJ (2007) Intervention to enhance skilled arm and hand movements after stroke: a feasibility study using a new virtual reality system. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian S, Knaut LA, Beaudoin C, McFadyen BJ, Feldman AG, Levin MF (2007) Virtual reality environment for post-stroke arm rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveistrup H (2004) Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality: review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 1:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF (2004) Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 1:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf SL (1983) Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients: a critical review. Phys Therapy 63:1448–1459

    Google Scholar 

  • Zardoshti-Kermani M, Wheeler BC, Badie K, Hashemi RM (1995) EMG feature evaluation for movement control of upper extremity prostheses. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 3(4):324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sha Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, S., Varley, M., Shark, LK. et al. Overcoming the information overload problem in a multiform feedback-based virtual reality system for hand motion rehabilitation: healthy subject case study. Virtual Reality 16, 325–334 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-012-0209-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-012-0209-2

Keywords

Navigation