Abstract
This study examined how the participant’s self-esteem and social physique anxiety affected the emotional reactions to viewing their own virtual body and willingness to participate in the virtual experience in the future. Three-dimensional body scanning technology was used as a virtual reality tool. Ninety-three (51 males and 42 females) subjects participated in the experiment, who were 18+ years old, both genders, and had no history of musculoskeletal or mental problems. The experiment consisted of the three phases, including the pre-scanning survey, 3D body scanning, and post-scanning evaluation. The results verified causal relationships that led to certain types of emotions after viewing the 3D virtual body and the willingness to participate in a future session, within the domains of self-esteem and social physique anxiety. Specifically, self-confidence (positive dimension of self-esteem) was strongly associated with positive emotions. The “other-oriented” perspective of social physique anxiety exhibited positive correlations with negative emotions. The participants who showed positive emotions indicated a strong willingness to participate in another session of 3D body scanning in the future, but those with negative emotions also showed their positive willingness to participate in the future session. It signified that regardless of their emotional responses (positive or negative) to viewing their 3D virtual body, the participants were willing to experience their 3D virtual body in the future. The findings suggested that this virtual reality approach could be used as a potentially effective, clinical tool for patients with body image-related disorders. Study limitations and future research were also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baranik LE, Meade AW, Lakey CE, Lance CE, Hu C, Hua W, Michalos A (2008) Examining the differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale across eight countries. J Appl Soc Psychol 38:1867–1904. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00372.x
Blanke O, Metzinger T (2009) Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn Sci 13:7–13
Bruchon-Schweitzer M (1992) Psicología del cuerpo. Herder, Barcelona
Cash TF (2004) Body image: past, present, and future. Body Image 1:1–5
Cash TF, Pruzinsky T (eds) (1990) Body images: development, deviance, and change. Guilford Press, New York
De Vignemont F, Frith U (2005) Egocentrism, allocentrism, and Asperger syndrome. Conscious Cogn 14:719–738. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.006
Dovidio JF, Major B, Crocker J (2000) Stigma: introduction and overview. In: Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, Hull JG (eds) Stigma: social psychological perspectives. Guilford, New York, pp 1–28
Eisinga R, te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B (2013) The reliability of a two-scale item: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int J Public Health 58:637–642. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
Ferrer-García M, Gutiérrez-Maldonado J (2012) The use of virtual reality in the study, assessment, and treatment of body image in eating disorders and nonclinical samples: a review of the literature. Body Image 9:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.10.001
Fontaine KR, Barofsky I, Bartlett SJ, Franckowiak SC, Andersen RE (2004) Weight loss and health-related quality of life: results at 1-year follow-up. Eating Behav 5:85–88. doi:10.1016/S1471-0153(03)00059-X
Fox KR (1998) Advances in the measurement of physical self. In: Duda JL (ed) Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Fitness Information Technology, Morgantown, pp 295–310
Friedman KE, Reichmann SK, Costanzo PR, Zelli A, Ashmore JA, Musante GJ (2005) Weight stigmatization and ideological beliefs: relation to psychological functioning in obese adults. Obes Res 13:907–916. doi:10.1038/oby.2005.105
Gardner RM (2002) Body image assessment of children. In: Cash TF, Pruzinsky T (eds) Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. Guilford, New York, pp 127–134
Greenberger E, Chen C, Dmitrieva J, Farruggia S (2003) Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: do they matter? Pers Individ Differ 35:1241–1254. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8
Hart E, Leary MR, Rejeski WJ (1989) The measurement of social physique anxiety. J Sport Exercise Psychol 11:94–104
Link BG, Phelan JC (2006) Stigma and its public health implications. Lancet 367:528–529
Loker S, Cowie L, Ashdown S, Lewis VD (2004) Female consumers’ reactions to body scanning. Cloth Text Res J 22:151–160
Mannarini S (2010) Assessing the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale dimensionality and items functioning in relation to self-efficacy and attachment styles. Test Psicometria Metodol 17:229–242
Martin KA, Rejeski WJ, Leary MR, McAuley E, Bane S (1997) Is the social physique anxiety scale really multidimensional? Conceptual and statistical arguments for a unidimensional model. J Sport Exercise Psychol 19:359–367
McKinnon L, Istook CL (1999) Psychological issues concerning body scanning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Textile and Apparel Association, Santa Fe, NM
Owens TJ (1993) Accentuate the positive-and the negative: rethinking the use of self-esteem, self-deprecation, and self-confidence. Soc Psychol Q 56:288–299
Perpiñá C, Botella C, Baños R, Marco H, Alcañiz M, Quero S (1999) Body image and virtual reality in eating disorders: is exposure to virtual reality more effective than the classical body image treatment? Cyberpsychol Behav 2:149–155
Riva G (2011) The key to unlocking the virtual body: virtual reality in the treatment of obesity and eating disorders. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5:283–292
Riva G, Cárdenas-López G, Duran X, Torress-Villalobos GM, Gaggioli A (2012) Virtual reality in the treatment of body image disturbances after bariatric surgery: a clinical case. Stud Health Technol 181:278–282
Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent child. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Schlenker BR, Leary MR (1982) Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. Psychol Bull 92:641–669
Sheasby JE, Barlow JH, Cullen LA, Wright CC (2000) Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among people with arthritis. Psychol Rep 86:1139–1146
Song H, Cai H, Brown JD, Grimm KJ (2011) Differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the US and China: measurement bias matters. Asin J Soc Psychol 14:176–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01347.x
Von Bergen CW, Soper B (1996) Self-esteem and self-concept confusion in males and females. Coll Stud J 4:418–424
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, J. Emotional reactions to the 3D virtual body and future willingness: the effects of self-esteem and social physique anxiety. Virtual Reality 22, 1–11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0314-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0314-3