Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) is a technology that uses a specialized user interface to connect people to the virtual world, where they can enjoy a multitude of visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile experiences. In this study, the analytic hierarchy process method is used to analyze the following four factors that affect consumers’ purchase decisions with respect to VR products: VR system requirements, purchase-oriented marketing of VR products, VR application types, and user-friendliness of VR products. Additionally, this study also examines consumer preferences for various VR products. Despite the interviewees’ concerns regarding computing power, product pricing, after-sales services, knowledge learning, and user-friendliness, the results of this study reveal that what they need most are VR products that can be used on the go. Therefore, portable VR is expected to be the trend as people are hoping to use VR applications whenever and wherever they wish to use them. This research provides the theoretical and managerial implications for understanding the potential trends for VR products and thus develops the appropriate marketing strategies for them.






Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abry P, Wendt H, Jaffard S (2013) When Van Gogh meets Mandelbrot: multifractal classification of painting’s texture. Sig Process 93(3):554–572
Alto P (2017) Media alert: virtual reality headset shipments top 1 million for the first time. https://www.canalys.com/newsroom/media-alert-virtual-reality-headset-shipments-top-1-million-first-time
Barnes SJ (2011) Understanding use continuance in virtual worlds: empirical test of a research model. Inf Manag 48(8):313–319
Brown A, Green T (2016) Virtual reality: low-cost tools and resources for the classroom. TechTrends 60(5):517–519
Cheng LK, Chieng MH, Chieng WH (2014) Measuring virtual experience in a three-dimensional virtual reality interactive simulator environment: a structural equation modeling approach. Virtual Real 18(3):173–188
Cochrane T (2016) Mobile VR in education: from the fringe to the mainstream. Int J Mob Blended Learn 8(4):44–60
Computer Hope (2017) Computer vs. smartphone. https://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch001398.htm
Cox DJ, Davis M, Singh H, Barbour B, Nidiffer FD, Trudel T et al (2010) Driving rehabilitation for military personnel recovering from traumatic brain injury using virtual reality driving simulation: a feasibility study. Mil Med 175(6):411–416
Freeman D, Evans N, Lister R, Antley A, Dunn G, Slater M (2014) Height, social comparison, and paranoia: an immersive virtual reality experimental study. Psychiatry Res 218(3):348–352
Goel L, Johnson NA, Junglas I, Ives B (2011) From space to place: predicting users’ intentions to return to virtual worlds. MIS Q 35(3):749–772
Grabowski A, Jankowski J (2015) Virtual reality-based pilot training for underground coal miners. Saf Sci 72:310–314
Huang HM, Rauch U, Liaw SS (2010) Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: based on a constructivist approach. Comput Educ 55(3):1171–1182
Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I (2011) Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 409(19):3578–3594
Huang HM, Liaw SS, Lai CM (2016) Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: a case study of desktop and projection-based display systems. Interact Learn Environ 24(1):3–19
Jones MG, Hite R, Childers G, Corin E, Pereyra M, Chesnutt K (2016) Perceptions of presence in 3-D, haptic-enabled, virtual reality instruction. Int J Educ Inf Technol 10:73–81
Jung Y (2011) Understanding the role of sense of presence and perceived autonomy in users’ continued use of social virtual worlds. J Comput Mediat Commun 16(4):492–510
Kenney PA, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, Libertino JA, Moinzadeh A (2009) Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology 73(6):1288–1292
Kober SE, Kurzmann J, Neuper C (2012) Cortical correlate of spatial presence in 2D and 3D interactive virtual reality: an EEG study. Int J Psychophysiol 83(3):365–374
Kuo Y, Yang T, Huang GW (2008) The use of grey relational analysis in solving multiple attribute decision-making problems. Comput Ind Eng 55(1):80–93
Lee EAL, Wong KW (2014) Learning with desktop virtual reality: low spatial ability learners are more positively affected. Comput Educ 79:49–58
Lombard M, Jones MT (2013) Telepresence and sexuality: a review and a call to scholars. Hum Technol Interdiscip J Hum ICT Environ 9(1):22–55
Lytras MD, Raghavan V, Damiani E (2017) Big data and data analytics research: from metaphors to value space for collective wisdom in human decision making and smart machines. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 13(1):1–10
Mäntymäki M, Islam AN (2014) Social virtual world continuance among teens: uncovering the moderating role of perceived aggregate network exposure. Behav Inf Technol 33(5):536–547
Merchant Z, Goetz ET, Keeney-Kennicutt W, Kwok OM, Cifuentes L, Davis TJ (2012) The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: a structural equation modeling analysis. Comput Educ 59(2):551–568
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26
Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98
Santos BS, Dias P, Pimentel A, Baggerman JW, Ferreira C, Silva S, Madeira J (2009) Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimed Tools Appl 41(1):161
Santos BS, Dias P, Silva S, Ferreira C, Madeira J (2011) Integrating user studies into computer graphics-related courses. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 31(5):14–17
Shobeiri S, Laroche M, Mazaheri E (2012) Shaping e-retailer’s website personality: the importance of experiential marketing. J Retail Consum Serv 20(1):102–110
Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2016) Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front Robot AI. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
Sun R, Wu YJ, Cai Q (2018) The effect of a virtual reality learning environment on learners’ spatial ability. Virtual Real. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0355-2
Tromp J, Le C, Le B, Le DN (2018) Massively multi-user online social virtual reality systems: ethical issues and risks for long-term use. In: Social networks science: design, implementation, security, and challenges. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90059-9_7
Velasquez M, Hester PT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Oper Res 10(2):56–66
Verhulst A, Normand JM, Lombard C, Moreau G (2017) A study on the use of an immersive virtual reality store to investigate consumer perceptions and purchase behavior toward non-standard fruits and vegetables. In: Virtual reality (VR), 2017 IEEE, pp 55–63. IEEE
Wu YCJ, Shen JP, Chang CL (2015) Electronic service quality of Facebook social commerce and collaborative learning. Comput Hum Behav 51:1395–1402
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, for financially supporting this research (Contract Number: MOST 106-2511-S-003-029-MY3 and 107-2410-H-992-011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Y., Chen, SC. & Lin, IC. Elucidating the impact of critical determinants on purchase decision in virtual reality products by Analytic Hierarchy Process approach. Virtual Reality 23, 187–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0373-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0373-0