Abstract
With immersive experiences becoming a medium for mass communication, we need pedagogies as well as scientific, evidence-based design principles for immersive learning. To foster evidence-based designs of immersive learning, we detail an empirical evaluation of a geosciences field trip, common in undergraduate education across numerous disciplines. The study builds on a previously proposed research framework in which we detailed a basic taxonomy of virtual field trips distinguishing between basic, plus, and advanced immersive virtual field trip experiences. The experiment reported here expands the original evaluation of basic field trips into the realm of plus versions using pseudo-aerial \(360^{\circ }\) imagery to provide embodied experiences that are not possible during the actual field trip. We also refined our original experimental design placing a stronger focus on the qualitative feedback elicited from the students. Results show an overwhelmingly positive response of students to virtual field trips with significantly higher-valued learning experience and enjoyment. Furthermore, the introduction of pseudo-aerial imagery (together with higher image resolution) shows a significant improvement in the participants spatial situation model. As contextualizing and spatially grounding is essential for place-based learning experiences, plus versions of virtual field trips have the potential to add value to the learning outcome and immersive virtual field trip experience. We discuss these encouraging results as well as critical feedback from the participants, such as the absence of touch in virtual experiences, and lay out our vision for the future of immersive learning experiences across environmental sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Modified from Klippel et al. (2019a)
(Source: Google Maps) (colour figure online)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allcoat D, von Mühlenen A (2018) Learning in virtual reality: effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Res Learn Technol. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2140
Blascovich J, Bailenson J (2011) Infinite reality: avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolution, 1st edn. William Morrow, New York
Boletsis C (2017) The new era of virtual reality locomotion: a systematic literature review of techniques and a proposed typology. Multimodal Technol Interact 1(4):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1040024
Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40(7):36–43
Bowman DA, Davis ET, Hodges LF (1999) Badre AN maintaining spatial orientation during travel in an immersive virtual environment. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 8(6):618–631. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474699566521
Brown A, Green T (2016) Virtual reality: low-cost tools and resources for the classroom. TechTrends 60(5):517–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0102-z
Bursztyn N, Shelton B, Walker A, Pederson J (2017) Increasing undergraduate interest to learn geoscience with GPS-based augmented reality field trips on students’ own smartphones. GSA Today 27:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG304A.1
Carbonell Carrera C, Bermejo Asensio LA (2017) Landscape interpretation with augmented reality and maps to improve spatial orientation skill. J Geogr High Educ 41(1):119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1260530
Carrivick JL, Smith MW, Quincey DJ (2016) Structure from motion in the geosciences. Wiley, Chichester. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895818
Chirico A, Ferrise F, Cordella L, Gaggioli A (2017) Designing awe in virtual reality: an experimental study. Front Psychol 8:2351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02351
Clifton PG, Chang JSK, Yeboah G, Doucette A, Chandrasekharan S, Nitsche M, Welsh T, Mazalek A (2016) Design of embodied interfaces for engaging spatial cognition. Cognit Res Princ Implic 1(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0032-5
de Jong T (1991) Learning and instruction with computer simulations. Educ Comput 6(3):217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9287(91)80002-F
Dede C (2009) Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science (New York, N.Y.) 323(5910):66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311
Dolphin G, Dutchak A, Karchewski B, Cooper J (2019) Virtual field experiences in introductory geology: addressing a capacity problem, but finding a pedagogical one. J Geosci Educ 67(2):114–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1547034
Elkins J, Elkins NML (2007) Teaching geology in the field: significant geoscience concept gains in entirely field-based introductory geology courses. J Geosci Educ 55(2):126–132
Fisher PF, Unwin D (eds) (2002) Virtual reality in geography. Taylor & Francis, London and New York
Fowler C (2015) Virtual reality and learning: where is the pedagogy? Br J Educ Technol 46(2):412–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12135
Gelman A, Nolan D (2010) A class project in survey sampling. Coll Teach 50(4):151–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595897
Hegarty M (2002) Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30(5):425–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2
Hurst SD (1998) Use of “virtual” field trips in teaching introductory geology. Comput Geosci 24(7):653–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00043-0
Johnson-Glenberg MC (2018) Immersive VR and education: embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Front Robot AI 5:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00081
Kamarainen AM, Thompson M, Metcalf SJ, Grotzer TA, Tutwiler MS, Dede C (2018) Prompting connections between content and context: blending immersive virtual environments and augmented reality for environmental science learning. In: Beck D, Pena-Rios A, Ogle T, Allison C, Morgado L, Pirker J, Richter J, Gütl C (eds) iLRN 2018 Montana: workshop, long and short paper , and poster proceedings from the fourth immersive learning research network conference. Verlag der Technischen Universität Graz, Graz, Austria, pp 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93596-6_3
Keltner D, Haidt J (2003) Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognit Emot 17(2):297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
Ketelhut DJ, Nelson BC, Clarke J, Dede C (2010) A multi-user virtual environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. Br J Educ Technol 41(1):56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01036.x
Klippel A, Zhao J, Jackson KL, LaFemina P, Stubbs C, Oprean D, Wallgrün JO, Blair J (2019a) Transforming earth science education through immersive experiences: delivering on a long held promise. J Educ Comput Res 57(7):1745–1771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854025
Klippel A, Zhao J, Oprean D, Wallgrün JO, Chang JSK, Wallgrun JO, Chang JSK (2019b) Research framework for immersive virtual field trips. In: IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces. KELVAR: the fourth IEEE VR workshop on K-12+ embodied learning through virtual and augmented reality. IEEE, pp 1612–1617. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798153
Krokos E, Plaisant C, Varshney A (2018) Virtual memory palaces: immersion aids recall. Virtual Real 23:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0360-5
Lages WS, Bowman DA (2018) Move the object or move myself? Walking versus manipulation for the examination of 3d scientific data. Front ICT 5:236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00015
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Learning in doing: social, cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lee EAL, Wong KW (2014) Learning with desktop virtual reality: low spatial ability learners are more positively affected. Comput Educ 79:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.010
Liu D, Dede C, Huang R, Richards J (eds) (2017) Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. Smart computing and intelligence. Springer, Singapore
Makransky G, Terkildsen TS, Mayer RE (2017) Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learn Instr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
Markowitz DM, Laha R, Perone BP, Pea RD, Bailenson JN (2018) Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Front Psychol 9:2364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02364
Mead C, Buxner S, Bruce G, Taylor W, Semken S, Anbar AD (2019) Immersive, interactive virtual field trips promote science learning. J Geosci Educ 67(2):131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1565285
Merchant Z, Goetz ET, Cifuentes L, Keeney-Kennicutt W, Davis TJ (2014) Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in k-12 and higher education: a meta-analysis. Comput Educ 70:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Minocha S, Tudor AD, Tilling S (2017) Affordances of mobile virtual reality and their role in learning and teaching. In: The 31st British human computer interaction conference, 3–6 July 2017. University of Sunderland’s St. Peter’s Campus, UK, pp 1–10
Narciso D, Bessa M, Melo M, Coelho A, Vasconcelos-Raposo J (2019) Immersive 360 video user experience: impact of different variables in the sense of presence and cybersickness. Univ Access Inf Soc 18(1):77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0581-5
Norman D (1980) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Piaget J (1974) To understand is to invent: the future of education, 1 viking compass edn. Viking Press, New York
Relf P (1996) The magic school bus wet all over: a book about the water cycle. Scholastic, New York
Riecke BE, Bodenheimer B, McNamara TP, Williams B, Peng P, Feuereissen D (2010) Do we need to walk for effective virtual reality navigation? Physical rotations alone may suffice. In: Hölscher C, Shipley TF, Belardinelli MO, Bateman JA, Newcombe NS (eds) Spatial cognition VII. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6222. Springer, Berlin, pp 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_21
Ruberto T, Mead C, Semken S, Bruce G, Buxner S, Anbar AD (2017) Proposing a digital teaching network for virtual field experiences [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the geological society of America (GSA); 22–25 Oct 2017; Seattle, Washington, USA, DC. Geological Society of America abstracts with programs; 2017. vol 49, no 6. https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2017AM-306229
Schreier M (2012) Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks
Semken S, Ward EG, Moosavi S, Chinn PWU (2018) Place-based education in geoscience: theory, research, practice, and assessment. J Geosci Educ 65(4):542–562. https://doi.org/10.5408/17-276.1
Slater M (2017) Implicit learning through embodiment in immersive virtual reality. In: Liu D, Dede C, Huang R, Richards J (eds) Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education, smart computing and intelligence. Springer, Singapore, pp 19–33
Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2016) Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front Robot AI 3:74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
Slater M, Wilbur S (1997) A framework for immersive virtual environments (five): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 6(6):603–616. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
Sriarunrasmee J, Suwannatthachote P, Dachakupt P (2015) Virtual field trips with inquiry learning and critical thinking process: a learning model to enhance students’ science learning outcomes. Proc Soc Behav Sci 197:1721–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.226
Steinicke F, Visell Y, Campos J, Lécuyer A (eds) (2013) Human walking in virtual environments: perception, technology, and applications. Springer, New York
Stumpf RJ, Douglass J, Dorn RI (2008) Learning desert geomorphology virtually versus in the field. J Geogr High Educ 32(3):387–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802221140
Unity: Unity3d (2018). https://unity3d.com/. Accessed 3 Apr 2018
Vorderer P, Wirth W, Gouveia FR, Biocca F, Saari T, Jäncke F, Böcking S, Schramm H, Gysbers A, Hartmann T, Klimmt C, Laarni J, Ravaja N, Sacau A, Baumgartner T, Jäncke P (2004) MEC spatial presence questionnaire (MEC-SPQ): short documentation and instructions for application. https://academic.csuohio.edu/kneuendorf/frames/MECFull.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2017
Vygotskiĭ LS, Cole M (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, edited by Michael Cole et al. (translated from the Russian). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London
Zhao J, Klippel A (2019) Scale-unexplored opportunities for immersive technologies in place-based learning. In: 2019 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR), Osaka, Japan. IEEE, pp 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797867
Zhao J, Klippel A, Minear M, Newcombe N, Bodenheimer B, McNamara T, Nazareth A, Sensibaugh T (2018) Desktop versus immersive virtual environments: effects on spatial learning [abstract]. In: 7th international conference on spatial cognition (ICSC Rome)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank students of Geosc 001 for their participation, the instructor, Peter Heaney, for his support, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their deeply insightful comments. This study was funded through a Penn State Strategic Planning award. Dr. Klippel would like to additionally acknowledge funding through the National Science Foundation Grants #1617396 and #1526520.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klippel, A., Zhao, J., Oprean, D. et al. The value of being there: toward a science of immersive virtual field trips. Virtual Reality 24, 753–770 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00418-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00418-5