Abstract
In recent years, research has found that people have stable predispositions to engage in certain behavioural patterns to work safely or unsafely, which vary among individuals as a function of their personality features. In this regard, an innovative machine learning model has been recently developed to predict workers’ behavioural tendency based on personality factors. This paper presents an empirical evaluation of the model’s prediction performance (i.e. the degree to which the model can generate similar results compared to reality) to address the issue of the model’s usability before it is implemented in real situations. As virtual reality allows a good grip on fidelity resembling real-world situations, it can stimulate more natural behaviour responses from participants to increase ecological validity of experimental results. Thus, we implemented a virtual reality experimentation environment to assess workers’ safety behaviour. The model’s prediction capability was then evaluated by comparing the model prediction results and workers’ safety behaviour as assessed in virtual reality. The comparison results showed that the model predictions on two dimensions of workers’ safety behaviour (i.e. task and contextual performance) were in good agreement with the virtual reality experimental results, with Spearman correlation coefficients of 79.7% and 87.8%, respectively. The machine learning model thus proved to have good prediction capability, which allows the model to help identify vulnerable workers who are prone to undertake unsafe behaviours. The findings also suggest that virtual reality is a promising method for measuring workers’ safety behaviour as it can provide a realistic and safe environment for experimentation.











Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Availability of data and material
All data and material that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Code availability
C# code generated during the development of the virtual reality scenarios is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
ACC (2018) The number of new accepted work related claims by the industry and injury cause. New Zealand. https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/injury-statistics-work-related-claims-2017
Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action control: from cognition to behavior. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Al-Haadir S, Panuwatwanich K, Stewart RA (2013) Empirical analysis of the impacts of safety motivation and safety climate on safety behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 19th CIB world building congress: construction and society, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2013. pp 5–9
Al-Shabbani Z, Sturgill R, Dadi G (2020) Evaluating the effectiveness of toolbox talks on safety awareness among highway maintenance crews. In: Construction research congress 2020. pp 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482872.024
Antwi-Afari MF, Li H, Yu Y, Kong L (2018) Wearable insole pressure system for automated detection and classification of awkward working postures in construction workers. Autom Constr 96:433–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.004
Arias S, Wahlqvist J, Nilsson D, Ronchi E, Frantzich H (2021) Pursuing behavioral realism in virtual reality for fire evacuation research. Fire Mater 45:462–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/fam.2922
Asiain J, Braun M, Roussos AJ (2021) Virtual reality as a psychotherapeutic tool: current uses and limitations. Br J Guid Couns. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1885008
Baldissone G, Comberti L, Bosca S, Murè S (2019) The analysis and management of unsafe acts and unsafe conditions. Data collection and analysis. Saf Sci 119:240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.10.006
Beus JM, Dhanani LY, McCord MA (2015) A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: addressing unanswered questions. J Appl Psychol 100:481–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037916
BLS.gov (2018) U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: industry injuries, illnesses, and fatalities statistics. Summary. https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshover.htm
Chessa M, Maiello G, Borsari A, Bex PJ (2019) The perceptual quality of the oculus rift for immersive virtual reality. Hum-Comput Interact 34:51–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1243478
Choi B, Hwang S, Lee S (2017) What drives construction workers’ acceptance of wearable technologies in the workplace? Indoor localization and wearable health devices for occupational safety and health. Autom Constr 84:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.005
Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ (2009) Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol 94:1103–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
Clarke S, Robertson I (2008) An examination of the role of personality in work accidents using meta-analysis. Appl Psychol 57:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00267.x
Cohen J (1992) Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1:98–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
Earle AM, Napper LE, LaBrie JW, Brooks-Russell A, Smith DJ, de Rutte J (2019) Examining interactions within the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of intentions to engage in cannabis-related driving behaviors. J Am Coll Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1557197
Engelbrecht H, Lindeman RW, Hoermann S (2019) A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality for firefighter training. Front Robot AI. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00101
Fang D, Tang FY, Huang H, Cheung CY, Chen H (2019) Repeatability, interocular correlation and agreement of quantitative swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography macular metrics in healthy subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 103:415. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311874
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Faulhaber AK et al (2019) Human decisions in moral dilemmas are largely described by utilitarianism: virtual car driving study provides guidelines for autonomous driving vehicles. Sci Eng Ethics 25:399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0020-x
Feng Z, González VA, Amor R, Lovreglio R, Cabrera-Guerrero G (2018) Immersive virtual reality serious games for evacuation training and research: a systematic literature review. Comput Educ 127:252–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.002
Fyhri A, Backer-Grøndahl A (2012) Personality and risk perception in transport. Accid Anal Prev 49:470–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.017
Gao Y (2020) Predicting construction workers’ unsafe-behaving intentions using machine learning algorithms and basic taxonomy of personality. Doctoral Dissertation. Article, University of Auckland
Gao Y, Gonzalez VA, Yiu TW (2019a) The effectiveness of traditional tools and computer-aided technologies for health and safety training in the construction sector: a systematic review. Comput Educ 138:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.003
Gao Y, Gonzalez VA, Yiu TW (2019b) Exploring the relationship between construction workers’ personality traits and safety behaviour. J Constr Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001763
Geiger M, Olderbak S, Sauter R, Wilhelm O (2018) The “g” in faking: doublethink the validity of personality self-report measures for applicant selection. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02153
Geller ES (2010) Cultivating a self-motivated work force: the choice, community and competence of an injury-free culture—“The best kind of pride is that which compels people to do their very best work, even if no one is watching”. https://www.ehstoday.com/safety/article/21906893/cultivating-a-selfmotivated-workforce-the-choice-community-and-competence-of-an-injuryfree-culture
Gillison FB, Rouse P, Standage M, Sebire SJ, Ryan RM (2019) A meta-analysis of techniques to promote motivation for health behaviour change from a self-determination theory perspective. Health Psychol Rev 13:110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1534071
Gorji A, Bowler N (2018) Dielectric measurement of low-concentration aqueous solutions: assessment of uncertainty and ion-specific responses. Meas Sci Technol 29:085801. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aac8c2
Gou J, Ma H, Ou W, Zeng S, Rao Y, Yang H (2019) A generalized mean distance-based k-nearest neighbor classifier. Expert Syst Appl 115:356–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.021
Grawitch MJ, Gottschalk M, Munz DC (2006) The path to a healthy workplace: a critical review linking healthy workplace practices, employee well-being, and organizational improvements. Consult Psychol J Pract Res 58:129–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.58.3.129
Greuter S, Tepe S (2013) Engaging students in OH&S hazard identification through a game. In: 6th Digital games research association (DiGRA) conference, Atlanta. At Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, 2013.
Guerin RJ, Toland MD (2020) An application of a modified theory of planned behavior model to investigate adolescents’ job safety knowledge, norms, attitude and intention to enact workplace safety and health skills. J Saf Res 72:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.002
Guo H, Yu Y, Skitmore M (2017) Visualization technology-based construction safety management: a review. Autom Constr 73:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.10.004
Guo H, Yu Y, Ding Q, Skitmore M (2018) Image-and-skeleton-based parameterized approach to real-time identification of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors. J Constr Eng Manag 144:04018042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001497
Habibnezhad M, Puckett J, Fardhosseini MS, Pratama LA (2019) A mixed VR and physical framework to evaluate impacts of virtual legs and elevated narrow working space on construction workers gait pattern. arXiv preprint arXiv:190608670
Han T, Anderson F, Irani P, Grossman T (2018) HydroRing: supporting mixed reality haptics using liquid flow. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 31st annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, Berlin, Germany
Harwell MR, Gatti GG (2001) Rescaling ordinal data to interval data in educational research. Rev Educ Res 71:105–131. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001105
Hasanzadeh S, de la Garza JM (2019) Understanding Roofer’s risk compensatory behavior through passive haptics mixed-reality system. Paper presented at the computing in civil engineering 2019: visualization, information modeling, and simulation
Hasanzadeh S, Dao B, Esmaeili B, Dodd Michael D (2019) Role of personality in construction safety: investigating the relationships between personality, attentional failure, and hazard identification under fall-hazard conditions. J Constr Eng Manag 145:04019052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001673
Heyde A, Miebach J, Kluge A (2014) Counterproductive work behaviour in a simulated production context: AN exploratory study with personality traits as predictors of safety-related rule violations. J Ergon 4:2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000130
Hirao Y, Kawai T (2019) Augmented cross-modality: translating the physiological responses, knowledge and impression to audio-visual information in virtual reality. Electron Imaging 2019:60402–60401-60402–60408. https://doi.org/10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2018.62.6.060402
Hoffmann EA (2008) “Revenge” and “rescue”: workplace deviance in the taxicab industry. Sociol Inq 78:270–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00240.x
Hogan J, Foster J (2013) Multifaceted personality predictors of workplace safety performance: more than conscientiousness. Hum Perform 26:20–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.736899
Jackson CJ (2009) Using the hybrid model of learning in personality to predict performance in the workplace. In: 8th IOP conference, conference proceedings, 2009. Manly, Sydney, Australia, pp 75–79
Jelonek M, Herrmann T (2019) Atentiveness for potential accidents at the construction site: virtual reality test environment with tactile warnings for behavior tests in hazardous situations. Paper presented at the proceedings of mensch und computer 2019, Hamburg, Germany
Jitwasinkul B, Hadikusumo BHW, Memon AQ (2016) A Bayesian belief network model of organizational factors for improving safe work behaviors in Thai Construction Industry. Saf Sci 82:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.027
Jones T, Moore T, Choo J (2016) The impact of virtual reality on chronic pain. PLoS ONE 11:e0167523. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167523
Kataoka Y (2018) Somewhat strange feeling of touching, lifting, and swinging in mixed-reality space—psychophysical analysis of haptic illusion caused by visual superimposition. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2018 ACM companion international conference on interactive surfaces and spaces, Tokyo, Japan
Kim H, Yi H, Lee H, Lee W (2018) HapCube: a wearable tactile device to provide tangential and normal pseudo-force feedback on a fingertip. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal QC, Canada
Krzykowska K, Krzykowski M (2019) Forecasting parameters of satellite navigation signal through artificial neural networks for the purpose of civil aviation. Int J Aerosp Eng 2019:11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7632958
Laurent J, Chmiel N, Hansez I (2020) Personality and safety citizenship: the role of safety motivation and safety knowledge. Heliyon 6:e03201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03201
Lee CE, Yong PJ, Williams C, Allaire C (2018) Factors associated with severity of irritable bowel syndrome symptoms in patients with endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 40:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.06.025
Lee J, Sinclair M, Gonzalez-Franco M, Ofek E, Holz C (2019) TORC: a virtual reality controller for in-hand high-dexterity finger interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2019. ACM, p 71
Li H, Chan G, Skitmore M (2012) Visualizing safety assessment by integrating the use of game technology. Autom Constr 22:498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.009
Li H, Yang X, Wang F, Rose T, Chan G, Dong S (2016) Stochastic state sequence model to predict construction site safety states through real-time location systems. Saf Sci 84:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.025
Li X, Yi W, Chi H-L, Wang X, Chan APC (2018) A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Automation Constr 86:150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.003
Li ASW, Figg G, Schüz B (2019a) Socioeconomic status and the prediction of health promoting dietary behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the theory of planned behaviour. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being 11:382–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12154
Li C, Yang Y, Liu S (2019b) A new method to mitigate data fluctuations for time series prediction. Appl Math Model 65:390–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.08.017
Lloréns R, Noé E, Colomer C, Alcañiz M (2015) Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96:418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.019
Lu X, Davis S (2016) How sounds influence user safety decisions in a virtual construction simulator. Saf Sci 86:184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.018
Marín-Morales J et al (2018) Affective computing in virtual reality: emotion recognition from brain and heartbeat dynamics using wearable sensors. Sci Rep 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32063-4
Maurer TJ, Pierce HR (1998) A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. J Appl Psychol 83:324–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.324
Mayer RE (2017) Using multimedia for e-learning. J Comput Assist Learn 33:403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Mentrikoski JM, Duncan CL, Enlow PT, Aballay AM (2019) Predicting adolescents’ intentions to engage in fire risk behaviors: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Burns 45:1242–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2019.02.006
Meyer OA, Omdahl MK, Makransky G (2019) Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: a media and methods experiment. Comput Educ 140:103603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103603
Nascimento-Ferreira MV et al (2018) Assessment of physical activity intensity and duration in the paediatric population: evidence to support an a priori hypothesis and sample size in the agreement between subjective and objective methods. Obes Rev 19:810–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12676
Nazemi M, van Eggermond MAB, Erath A, Schaffner D (2021) Studying bicyclists’ perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulator combined with immersive virtual reality. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105943
Newman JM, Siqueira MBP, Klika AK, Molloy RM, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA (2019) Use of closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients at high risk for infection: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplast 34:554-559.e551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.017
Norman P, Webb TL, Millings A (2019) Using the theory of planned behaviour and implementation intentions to reduce binge drinking in new university students. Psychol Health 34:478–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2018.1544369
Panuwatwanich K, Al-Haadir S, Stewart RA (2017) Influence of safety motivation and climate on safety behaviour and outcomes: evidence from the Saudi Arabian construction industry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 23:60–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1235424
Patel DA, Jha KN (2015a) Neural network approach for safety climate prediction. J Manag Eng 31:05014027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000348
Patel DA, Jha KN (2015b) Neural network model for the prediction of safe work behavior in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 141:04014066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000922
Patel DA, Jha KN (2016) Evaluation of construction projects based on the safe work behavior of co-employees through a neural network model. Saf Sci 89:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.020
Rafiei MH, Adeli H (2018) Novel machine-learning model for estimating construction costs considering economic variables and indexes. J Constr Eng Manag 144:04018106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001570
Rajagopalan G (2021) Data visualization with python libraries. In: Rajagopalan G (ed) A python data analyst’s toolkit: learn python and python-based libraries with applications in data analysis and statistics. Apress, Berkeley, pp 243–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-6399-0_7
Rau P-LP, Liao P-C, Guo Z, Zheng J, Jing B (2018) Personality factors and safety attitudes predict safety behaviour and accidents in elevator workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1493259
Rivera E, Haim Erder M, Fridman M, Frye D, Hortobagyi GN (2003) First-cycle absolute neutrophil count can be used to improve chemotherapy-dose delivery and reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving adjuvant therapy: a validation study. Breast Cancer Res 5:R114. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr618
Rose A, Rae WID (2019) Personal protective equipment availability and utilization among interventionalists. Saf Health Work 10:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.10.001
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sacks R, Perlman A, Barak R (2013) Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Constr Manag Econ 31:1005–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.828844
Samant SS, Seo H-S (2019) Using both emotional responses and sensory attribute intensities to predict consumer liking and preference toward vegetable juice products. Food Qual Prefer 73:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.12.006
Scardapane S, Van Vaerenbergh S, Totaro S, Uncini A (2019) Kafnets: Kernel-based non-parametric activation functions for neural networks. Neural Netw 110:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2018.11.002
Seo H-C, Lee Y-S, Kim J-J, Jee N-Y (2015) Analyzing safety behaviors of temporary construction workers using structural equation modeling. Saf Sci 77:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.010
Shakerian M, Jahangiri M, Alimohammadlou M, Nami M, Choobineh A (2019) Individual cognitive factors affecting unsafe acts among Iranian industrial workers: An integrative meta-synthesis interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Saf Sci 120:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.041
Shi Y, Du J, Ahn CR, Ragan E (2019) Impact assessment of reinforced learning methods on construction workers’ fall risk behavior using virtual reality. Autom Constr 104:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.015
Shi Y, Du J, Ragan E, Choi K, Ma S (2018) Social influence on construction safety behaviors: a multi-user virtual reality experiment. Paper presented at the construction research congress, New Orleans, Louisiana,
Shuang D, Qin Y, Heng L (2015) Positive safety participation and assessment by integrating sharing technology with virtual reality. Procedia Eng 123:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.069
Sing C, Love P, Fung I, Edwards D (2014) Personality and occupational accidents: bar benders in Guangdong Province, Shenzhen, China. J Constr Eng Manag 140:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000858
Singaravel S, Suykens J, Geyer P (2018) Deep-learning neural-network architectures and methods: using component-based models in building-design energy prediction. Adv Eng Inform 38:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.06.004
STATS.gov (2018) National Bureau of Statistics of China. Summary. http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01
Steyerberg EW (2009) Clinical prediction models, vol 381. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16399-0
Varela-Aldás J, Fuentes EM, Palacios-Navarro G, García-Magariño I (2020) A comparison of heart rate in normal physical activity vs. immersive virtual reality exergames. In: Ahram T, Karwowski W, Pickl S, Taiar R (eds) Human systems engineering and design II. Springer, Cham, pp 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_104
Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J (2017) Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput 27:1413–1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4
Wang L, Hagoort P, Jensen O (2017) Language prediction is reflected by coupling between frontal gamma and posterior alpha oscillations. J Cogn Neurosci 30:432–447. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01190
Wenk N, Penalver-Andres J, Buetler KA, Nef T, Müri RM, Marchal-Crespo L (2021) Effect of immersive visualization technologies on cognitive load, motivation, usability, and embodiment. Virtual Reality. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00565-8
Wolf D, Rietzler M, Hnatek L, Rukzio E (2019) Face/On: multi-modal haptic feedback for head-mounted displays in virtual reality. IEEE Trans vis Comp Graph 25:3169–3177. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2932215
Wolff A, Di Giovanni DA, Gómez-Pilar J, Nakao T, Huang Z, Longtin A, Northoff G (2019) The temporal signature of self: Temporal measures of resting-state EEG predict self-consciousness. Hum Brain Mapp 40:789–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24412
Worksafe (2015) The health and safety at work act. New Zealand. https://worksafe.govt.nz/managing-health-and-safety/getting-started/health-and-safety-at-work-quick-reference-guide/.
Wu TLY, Gomes A, Fernandes K, Wang D (2018) The effect of head tracking on the degree of presence in virtual reality. Int J Hum Comput Interact. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1555736
Xi W, Gong H, Wang Q (2019) How hand gestures influence the enjoyment in gamified mobile marketing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 127:169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.010
Yang L, Liu S, Tsoka S, Papageorgiou LG (2017) A regression tree approach using mathematical programming. Expert Syst Appl 78:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.013
Yu Y, Zhang J, Guo H (2017) Investigation of the relationship between construction workers' psychological states and their unsafe behaviors using virtual environment-based testing. Paper presented at the ASCE international workshop on computing in civil engineering 2017, Seattle, Washington
Yuan X, Li Y, Xu Y, Huang N (2018) Curvilinear effects of personality on safety performance: the moderating role of supervisor support. Personal Individ Differ 122:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.005
Zhang F, Fleyeh H, Wang X, Lu M (2019) Construction site accident analysis using text mining and natural language processing techniques. Autom Constr 99:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.016
Funding
This research is supported by Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The University of Auckland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: The work-specific big five inventory
Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree).
I see myself as someone who… | |
---|---|
Q1: is talkative at worka | Q18: is generally trusting at workb |
Q2: tends to find fault with others at workb | Q19: tends to be lazy at workc |
Q3: does a thorough job at workc | Q20: is emotionally stable at workd |
Q4: is depressed at workd | Q21: has an assertive personality at worka |
Q5: is reserved at worka | Q22: can be cold and aloof at workb |
Q6: is helpful and unselfish with others at workb | Q23: perseveres until the task is finished at workc |
Q7: can be somewhat careless at workc | Q24: can be moody at workd |
Q8: handles stress well at workd | Q25: is sometimes shy at worka |
Q9: is full of energy at worka | Q26: is considerate and kind to almost everyone at work. (b) |
Q10: starts quarrels with others at workb | Q27: does things efficiently at workc |
Q11: is a reliable worker at workc | Q28: remains calm in tense situations at workd |
Q12: can be tense at workd | Q29: is outgoing at worka |
Q13: generates a lot of enthusiasm at worka | Q30: is sometimes rude to others at workb |
Q14: has a forgiving nature at workb | Q31: makes plans and follows through with them at workc |
Q15: tends to be disorganised at workc | Q32: gets nervous easily at workd |
Q16: worries a lot at workd | Q33: likes to cooperate with others at workb |
Q17: tends to be quiet at worka | Q34: is easily distracted at workc |
Appendix B: The safety behaviour scale
Please indicate the extent to which you agree with the following statements (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree).
I see myself as someone who… |
---|
Q1: overlooks safety procedures in order to get my job done more quicklya |
Q2: follows all safety procedures regardless of the situation I am ina |
Q3: handles all situations cautiously to not take shortcut as if there is a possibility of having an accidenta |
Q4: uses safety equipment required by safety practicesa |
Q5: keeps workplace cleanb |
Q6: helps co-workers to be safeb |
Q7: follows safety practices to keep my work equipment in safe working conditiona |
Q8: takes shortcuts to safe working behaviours in order to get the job done fastera |
Q9: does not follow safety practices that I think are unnecessarya |
Q10: reports safety problems to my supervisor when I see safety problems performed by co-workersb |
Q11: corrects co-workers’ unsafe acts to ensure accidents will not occurb |
Appendix C: Machine learning model weights and biases
See Table
4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, Y., González, V.A., Yiu, T.W. et al. Immersive virtual reality as an empirical research tool: exploring the capability of a machine learning model for predicting construction workers’ safety behaviour. Virtual Reality 26, 361–383 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00572-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00572-9