Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of attentional engagement and spatial characteristics on time perception in virtual reality

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is a simulation tool that is being used extensively to study the effects of training and perception. However, several studies have shown that some aspects of perception within VR are not always accurate. The present study investigates the perception of time within a VR environment by asking for retrospective time judgments of the length of VR experiences. These environments varied in both the level of interaction with the VR environment and also the spatial qualities of the environment itself. The judged length of time did not significantly differ between conditions based on the level of activity in the environment, but the spatial characteristics of the VR environment did produce significantly different time estimations. This finding suggests that careful attention should be paid to what and how users are trained or evaluated in VR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Upon request.

Code availability

Public.

References

  • Bansal A, Weech S, Barnett-Cowan M (2019) Movement-contingent time flow in virtual reality causes temporal recalibration. Sci Rep 9(1):4378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40870-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat K, Liou W, Chang C (2016) A cost-effective interactive 3D virtual reality system applied to military live firing training. Virtual Reality 20:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0284-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block R, Hancock P, Zakay D (2010) How cognitive load affects duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Acta Physiol 134(3):330–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadway J, Engle R (2011) Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reduction. Acta Physiol (oxf) 137:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety: the experience of flow in work and games. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman D, Tse P, Buonomano D, Janssen P, Nobre A, Holcombe A (2005) Time and the brain: how subjective time relates to neural time. J Neurosci 25(45):10369–10371. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3487-05.2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filigenzi M, Orr T, Ruff T (2000) Virtual reality for mine safety training. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 15(6):465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan D, O’Neill E, Proulx M (2016) Compensating for distance compression in audiovisual virtual environments using incongruence. In: CHI‘16: proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858065.

  • French JW, Ekstrom RB, Price LA (1963) Hidden figures test: manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Green CS, Bavelier D (2015) Action video game training for cognitive enhancement. Curr Opin Behav Sci 4:103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igarzábal FA, Hruby H, Witowska J, Khoshnoud S, Wittmann M (2021) What happens while waiting in virtual reality? A comparison between a virtual and a real waiting situation concerning boredom, self-regulation, and the experience of time. Technol Mind Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Sharma N, Dixit S (2006) Effect of cognitive load and paradigm on time perception. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol 32(1):37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitajima M, Kanari K, Sato M (2020) An examination of effects of fear using VR content on time estimation. In: 26th ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology, pp 1–2

  • Lacquaniti F, Carrozzo M, d’Avella A, La Scaleia B, Moscatelli A, Zago M (2014) How long did it last? You better ask a human. Front Neurobiot 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2014.00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Yuan D, Fan Y, Yan C, Gao L (2019) Effect of motion perception on intertemporal choice is associated with the altered perception of time. Psychol Rep 122(1):117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118755098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Duh H, Parker D, Abi-Rached H, Furness T (2002) Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings IEEE virtual reality 2002, Orlando, FL, USA. pp 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2002.996519

  • Loomis J, Knapp J (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In: Hettinger LJ, Haas MW (eds) Virtual and adaptive environments: applications, implications, and human performance issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale, pp 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410608888.pt1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WJ (2011) How do changes in speed affect the perception of duration? J Exp Psychol 37(5):1617–1627. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WJ, Meck WH (2016) Temporal cognition: connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychol Bull 142(8):865–907. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumert J, Kearney J, Cremer J, Recker K (2005) Distance perception in real and virtual environments. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2(3):216–233. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077399.1077402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutrecht H, Wittmann M, Khoshnoud S, Igarzábal FA (2021) Time speeds up during flow states: a study in virtual reality with the video game thumper. Timing Time Percept 9(4):353–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett A, Meyvis T, Nelson L, Converse B, Sackett A (2010) You’re having fun when time flies: the hedonic consequences of subjective time progression. Psychol Sci 21(1):111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609354832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez CA (2012) Enhancing visuospatial performance through video game training to increase learning in visuospatial science domains. Psychon Bull Rev 19:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sander T, Cairns P (2010) Time perception, immersion, and music in videogames. In: McEwan T, McKinnon L (eds) BCS’10 Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction specialist group conference. Swindon BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, pp 190–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzschneider C, Bruder G, Steinicke F (2016) Who turned the clock? Effects of manipulated zeitgebers, cognitive load, and immersion on time estimation. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 22:1387–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SM, Kisby CK, Flint EP (2011) Effect of virtual reality on time perception in patients receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, O’Brian M, Bansal V, Andersen D, Satava R (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized double blind study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–464. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sucala M, Stefan S, Szentagotai-Tatar A, David D (2010) Time flies when you expect to have fun: an experimental investigation of the relationship between expectancies and the perception of time progression. Cogn Brain Behav 14(3):231–241. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20391.80805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth N, Redick TS, Heitz RP, Broadway JM, Engle RW (2009) Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: a latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory 17(6):635–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210902998047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ham I, Klaassen F, van Schie K, Cuperus A (2019) Elapsed time estimates in virtual reality and the physical world: the role of arousal and emotional valence. Comput Hum Behav 94:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wassenhove V, Buonomano D, Shimojo S, Shamn L (2008) Distortions of subjective time perception within and across senses. PLoS ONE 3(1):e1437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel DH, Falter-Wagner CM, Schoofs T, Krämer K, Kupke C, Vogeley K (2020) Flow and structure of time experience–concept, empirical validation and implications for psychopathology. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 19:235–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann M, Paulus M (2008) Decision making, impulsivity and time perception. Trends Cogn Sci 12(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Sinnis-Bourozikas A, Interrante V (2019) Exploring the use of immersive virtual reality to assess the impact of outdoor views on the perceived size and spaciousness of architectural interiors. In: Bourdot P, Interrante V, Nedel L, Magnenat-Thalmann N, Zachmann G (eds) Virtual reality and augmented reality. EuroVR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11883. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaele De Amicis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Read, T., Sanchez, C.A. & De Amicis, R. The influence of attentional engagement and spatial characteristics on time perception in virtual reality. Virtual Reality 27, 1265–1272 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00723-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00723-6

Keywords

Navigation