Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of CT-based volumetric assessment methods for total lung capacity with the development of an adjustment factor: incorporating VR imaging for improved accuracy

  • S.I. : New Trends on Immersive Healthcare
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physiological methods for measuring total lung capacity (TLC), including body-box plethysmography (BBP), are costly and require specialized expertise. Computed tomography (CT)-based TLC assessment is essential in clinical practice for candidates of lung transplantation and those unable to undergo standard lung function testing. While CT-based algorithms were studied to estimate TLC, their accuracy should be further evaluated. This study aimed to compare the BBP measurement of TLC (TLCpleth) with three CT-based methods for measuring TLC, one of them is an innovative virtual reality (VR)-based method. Additionally, we aimed to develop an adjustment factor that will allow a new, non-invasive, cost-effective estimation of the TLCpleth. TLC was calculated for 24 adult patients using three different CT-based volumetric assessment methods: an older region-growing algorithm (TLCrg), a more recent convolutional neural network-based algorithm (TLCcnn), and a VR-based method (TLCvr). Agreement between each method and TLCpleth was evaluated, and an adjustment factor was developed using linear regression. The correlation between the three CT-based methods and TLCpleth ranged from 0.91 to 0.92 (p < 0.001). TLCvr measurements were 80.13% (CI:75.08–85.18%, P < 0.001) of TLCpleth measures, whereas TLCcnn and TLCrg estimates were 71.3% and 77.1% of TLCpleth, respectively. An adjustment factor is proposed to estimate TLCpleth based on the three CT-based methods. This study is the first to evaluate the correlation between BBP, VR volumetric analysis, and two iterations of CT volumetric software for measuring total lung capacity (TLC). After being corrected by an adjustment factor, VR- and CT-based assessments provide accurate estimates of TLCpleth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

TLCrg:

Total lung capacity (TLC) calculated by a region-growing algorithm

TLCcnn:

TLC calculated by a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithm

TLCvr:

TLC calculated by a virtual reality (VR)-based algorithm

TLCpleth:

TLC calculated by body-box plethysmography

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Esther Singer for her editorial assistance.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shai Tejman-Yarden.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yogev, D., Chatarji, S., Carl, L. et al. A comparative study of CT-based volumetric assessment methods for total lung capacity with the development of an adjustment factor: incorporating VR imaging for improved accuracy. Virtual Reality 28, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00892-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00892-y

Keywords

Navigation