Skip to main content
Log in

Competence-driven project portfolio selection, scheduling and staff assignment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new model for project portfolio selection, paying specific attention to competence development. The model seeks to maximize a weighted average of economic gains from projects and strategic gains from the increment of desirable competencies. As a sub-problem, scheduling and staff assignment for a candidate set of selected projects must also be optimized. We provide a nonlinear mixed-integer program formulation for the overall problem, and then propose heuristic solution techniques composed of (1) a greedy heuristic for the scheduling and staff assignment part, and (2) two (alternative) metaheuristics for the project selection part. The paper outlines experimental results on a real-world application provided by the E-Commerce Competence Center Austria and, for a slightly simplified instance, presents comparisons with the exact solution computed by CPLEX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brooks F (1975). The mythical man-month. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen ANK and Edgington TM (2005). Assessing value in organizational knowledge creation: considerations for knowledge workers. MIS Quart 29: 279–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffin MA and Taylor BW (1996). Multiple criteria R&D project selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic. Comput Oper Res 23: 207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni RA (1994). Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M and Stützle T (2004). Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H and Dreyfus S (1986). Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Narasimhan O and Rajiv S (1999). Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: methodology and empirical application. Strat Manage J 26: 277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erpenbeck J, Heyse V (1999) Kompetenzbiographie—Kompetenzmilieu—Kompetenztransfer. QUEM-Report 62, Berlin

  • Gutjahr WJ (2006). On the finite-time dynamics of ant colony optimization. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 8: 105–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutjahr WJ, Katzensteiner S, Reiter P (2007) A VNS algorithm for noisy problems and its application to project portfolio analysis. In: Hromkovic J et al (eds) Proceedings SAGA 2007 (Stochastic algorithms: foundations and applications). LNCS, vol 4665. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 93–104

  • Haesli A and Boxall P (2005). When knowledge management meets HR strategy: an exploration of personalization-retention and codification-recruitment configurations. Int J Human Resour Manage 16: 1955–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HR-XML Consortium (2007) Competencies (Measurable Characteristics) Recommendation 2006-02-28. Available at http://ns.hr-xml.org/2_4/HR-XML-2_4/CPO/Competencies.html, last visited: March 30, 2007

  • Kolisch R and Hartmann S (2006). Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: an update. Euro J Oper Res 174: 23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolisch R, Meyer K and Mohr R (2005). Maximizing R&D portfolio value. Res Technol Manage 48: 33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z (1996). Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz Z, Arabas J (1994) Genetic algorithms for the 0/1 knapsack problem. In: Proceedings of 8th international symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems. LNCS, vol 869. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 134–143

  • Möhring RH and Stork F (2000). Linear preselective policies for stochastic project scheduling. Math Methods Oper Res 52: 501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenyama O, Guergachi A and McLaren T (2007). Using the learing curve to maximize IT productivity: a decision analysis model for timing software upgrades. Int J Product Econ 105: 524–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006) Main Science and Technology Indicators 2006/2, OECD, Paris

  • Padman R and Zhu D (2006). Knowledge integration using problem spaces: a study in resource-constrained project scheduling. J Scheduling 9: 133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf MA (2001). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strat Manage J 1: 179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Stützle T and Hoos HH (2000). MAX–MIN Ant System. Future Generation Comput Syst 16: 889–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman R and Venkatraman S (1995). R&D project selection and scheduling for organizations facing product obsolescence. R&D Manage 25: 57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu M-C and Sun S-H (2006). A project scheduling and staff assignment model considering learning effect. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 28: 1190–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter J. Gutjahr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gutjahr, W.J., Katzensteiner, S., Reiter, P. et al. Competence-driven project portfolio selection, scheduling and staff assignment. Central Europ J Oper Res 16, 281–306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-008-0057-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-008-0057-z

Keywords

Navigation