Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financial valuation of investments in future power generation technologies: nuclear fusion and CCS in an emissions trading system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines a model approach for the financial valuation of future power generation technologies, such as nuclear fusion or carbon capture and storage (CCS) under an emissions trading regime. Since on imperfect markets, interdependencies between decisions inhibit the isolated valuation of an investment, we use simultaneous calculation of optimal production, sales and investment programs; these are subject to the constraints and conditions characteristic for investments in low- and zero-carbon technologies such as fusion and CCS. Duality theory allows to derive, identify and economically interpret the determinants for the price ceiling as (corrected) net present values. Sensitivity analysis shows how changes in the technical specification or environmental policies affect the maximum payable price. Particularly, tradable permits have several effects on low-carbon investments and do not always encourage CO 2 abatement. While a zero-emissions technology like fusion always profits from a tightened emissions trading scheme, for low-carbon technology like CCS—in particular cases—this may even be counterproductive from an economic as well as an environmental point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadie LM, Chamorro JM (2008) European CO 2 prices and carbon capture investments. Energy Econ 30: 2992–3015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednyagin D, Gnansounou E (2010) Real options valuation of fusion energy R&D programme. Energy Policy 39: 116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli D (1738) Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis, commentarii academiae scientiarum imperialis petropolitanae, tomus V, 175–92. Translated by Sommer L (1954) as: Expositions of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica 22:23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco MI, Rodrigues G (2008) Can the future EU ETS support wind energy investments?. Energy Policy 36: 1509–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner B (2007) Policy uncertainty, investment and commitment periods. IEA information paper, OECD, Paris

  • Chakraborty A et al (2004) Optimal waste reduction and investment planning under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 28: 1145–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook I et al (1999) Proceedings 26th EPS conference control. Fusion and plasma physics, Maastricht, The Netherlands, ECA 23J:225–228

  • Dantzig GB, Thapa MN (1997) Linear programming. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1959) Theory of value. Gerard, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossen HH (1854) Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln. Vieweg, Braunschweig [Reprint: Libera C N.V. publishers, Amsterdam]

  • Hering T (2006) Unternehmensbewertung, 2nd Edn. Oldenbourg, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2008) CO 2 capture and storage. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2009) World energy outlook 2009. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007—Mitigation of climate change: contribution of working Group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Jaehn F, Letmathe P (2010) The emissions trading paradox. Eur J Oper Res 202: 248–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaensch G (1966) Wert und Preis der ganzen Unternehmung. Westdt., Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons W (1871) Theory of political economy. Macmillian, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingelhöfer HE (2000) Betriebliche Entsorgung und Produktion. Dt. Univ., Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingelhöfer HE (2003) Investitionsbewertung auf unvollkommenen Kapitalmärkten unter Unsicherheit. Betrieb Forsch Prax 55: 279–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingelhöfer HE (2006) Finanzwirtschaftliche Bewertung von Umweltschutzinvestitionen. Dt. Univ., Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingelhöfer HE (2009) Investments in EOP-technologies and emissions trading—Results from a linear programming approach and sensitivity analysis. Eur J Oper Res 196: 370–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutsson D et al (2006) Combined heat and power in the Swedish district heating sector—impact of green certificates and CO 2 trading on new investments. Energy Policy 34:3942–3952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1957) Allocation of resources and the price system. In: Koopmans TC (eds) Three essays on the state of economic science. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1959) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (eds) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New Haven, pp 33–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurikka H (2006) Option value of gasification technology within an emissions-trading scheme. Energy Policy 34: 3916–3928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurikka H, Koljonen T (2006) Emissions trading and investment decisions in the power sector—a case study in Finland. Energy Policy 34:1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee JF (1964a) How to use decision trees in capital investment. Harvard Bus Rev 42: 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee JF (1964b) Decision trees for decision making. Harvard Bus Rev 42: 126–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisonnier D et al (2005) A conceptual study of fusion power plants. Eur Fusion Dev Agreem (05)–27/4.10. http://www.efda.org/eu_fusion_programme/scientific_and_technical_publications.htm

  • Mao JCT (1969) Quantitative analysis of financial decisions. Macmillian, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matschke MJ (1975) Der Entscheidungswert der Unternehmung. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Matschke MJ, Brösel G, Matschke X (2010) Fundamentals of functional business valuation. J Bus Val Econ Loss 5(1): 7

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company (2008) Carbon capture & storage: assessing the economics, September 2008

  • Menger C (1871) Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Braumüller, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikaido H (1968) Convex structures and economic theory. Acad Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinaud J (2003) Emissions trading and its possible impacts on investment decisions in the power sector. IEA information paper, OECD, Paris

  • Sekar RC et al (2007) Future carbon regulations and current investments in alternative coal-fired power plant technologies. Energy Policy 35: 1064–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor NP et al (2000) A model of the availability of a fusion power plant. Fusion Eng Des 51(52): 363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2010) Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention. http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_16/application/pdf/cop16_lca.pdf (accessed 19 December 2010)

  • Walras L (1874) Élements d’économie politique pure ou théorie de la richesse sociale. Lausanne, Paris, [Faksmile-Ausgabe, hrsg. von Engels W, Hax H, Hayek F, Recktenwald HC (1988), Düsseldorf]

  • Ward DJ (2002) Operation of a fusion power plant at reduced power, SERF 3 Report. EURATOM/UKAEA Fusion Association, Culham

  • Ward DJ, Cook I, Lechon Y, Saez R (2005) The economic viability of fusion power. Fusion Eng Des 75(79): 1221–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward DJ, Han WE (2009) Revised assessment of the economics of fusion power. Fusion Eng Des 84: 895–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber C (2005) Uncertainty in the electric power industry. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Blyth W (2007) Modeling investment risks and uncertainties with real options approach. International energy agency working paper, OECD, Paris

  • Zhao J (2003) Irreversible abatement investment under cost uncertainties: tradable emission permits and emissions charges. J Public Econ 87: 2765–2789

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinz Eckart Klingelhöfer.

Additional information

This paper was submitted as one of many contributions on environmental management at the EURO XXIII conference hosted by the University of Siegen. The editorial work was done by Peter Letmathe (University of Siegen), Axel Tuma (University of Augsburg) and Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber (METU Ankara).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klingelhöfer, H.E., Kurz, P. Financial valuation of investments in future power generation technologies: nuclear fusion and CCS in an emissions trading system. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19, 415–438 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-011-0193-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-011-0193-8

Keywords

Navigation