Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency determinations of the worldwide railway companies via DEA and contributions of the outputs to the efficiency and TFP by panel regression

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study attempts to obtain efficiency scores of thirty-one railway companies operating worldwide by using data envelopment analysis. To assess the data covering a term from 2000 to 2009, we use CCR and BCC methods. According to the results of the CCR model analysis, 17 firms are found to have technical efficiency in the first year, whereas this figure goes up to 18 companies in the last year. Input oriented and variable return analysis in the concept of the BCC model, the number of the firms found technically efficient at the beginning of the period are 20. At the end of the period, this figure is up to 24. We implement panel regression analysis to estimate the effects of the companies’ output on their efficiency. Results imply that CCR models provide us more meaningful explanations. Malmquist Index analysis also indicates that total factor productivity increases by 0.03 % for the entire period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson SE, Cornwell C (1998) Estimating radial measures of productivity growth: frontier vs non-frontier approaches. J Prod Anal 10:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balgati BH (2008) Econometrics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in DEA. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantos P, Pastor JM, Serrano L (1999) Productivity efficiency and technical change in the European railways: a non-parametric approach. Transportation 26(4):337–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves D, Christiensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the mesurement of input output and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1979) Short communication: measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 3(4):339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TA, Perelman S (1999) A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions with application to European Railways. Eur J Oper Res 117:326–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie J (1999) The technical efficiency of public and private ownership in the rail industry: the case of Swiss. J Transp Econ Policy 33(3):241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19(3):273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman İ (2006) Demiryollarının yeniden yapılanma ihtiyacı ve TCDD’deki gelişmeler. Uluslararası demiryolu sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı 2:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc 120(3):253–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati DN (2004) Basic econometrics. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1951) An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans TC (ed) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan LW, Lin ETJ (2006) Performance measurement for railway transport: Stochastic distance functions with inefficiency and ineffectiveness effects. J Transp Econ Policy 40(3):383–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu FF, Wang PH (2008) DEA malmquist productivity measure: taiwanese semiconductor companies. Int J Prod Econ 112:367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loizides J, Tsionas EG (2004) Dynamic distributions of productivity growth in European railways. J Transp Econ Policy 38(1):45–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist S (1953) Indeks number and indifferences surfaces. Trabajos de Estatistica 4:209–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nashand ASJ, Nash CA (2010) Benchmarking of train operating firms: a transaction cost efficiency analysis. Transp Plan Technol 33(1):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabri K, Colson GE, Mbangala AM (2008) Multiple criteria and multiple periods performance analysis: the comparison of North African railways. Computing anticipatory systems: CASYS’07-eighth international conference. AIP conference proceedings, vol 1051, pp 351–365

  • Şaşamaz Ç (2008) Karayollarında ve demiryollarında verimlilik analizi. Dissertation, Pamukkale Üniversitesi

  • TCDD (2011) Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Devlet Demiryolları istatistik yıllığı: 2006–2010. http://www.tcdd.gov.tr/Upload/Files/ContentFiles/2010/istatistik/20062010yillik.pdf. Accessed 01 February 2012

  • UIC (2011) Railway time-series data 1970–2009. http://www.uic.org/etf/publication/publication-detailphp?code_pub=302/70-09xl. Accessed 01 February 2012

  • Wang S, Liao C (2006) Cost structure and productivity growth of the Taiwan railway. Transp Res Part E 42:317–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu M (2008) Assessing the technical efficiency service effectiveness and technical effectiveness of the world’s railways through NDEA analysis. Transp Res Part A 42:1283–1294

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Kabasakal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kabasakal, A., Kutlar, A. & Sarikaya, M. Efficiency determinations of the worldwide railway companies via DEA and contributions of the outputs to the efficiency and TFP by panel regression. Cent Eur J Oper Res 23, 69–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-013-0303-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-013-0303-x

Keywords

Navigation