Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Kaizen teaching and the learning habits of engineering students in a freshman mathematics course

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Which are the teaching methods that actually contribute to the learning of mathematics? The answer to this certainly is the holy grail of didactic and pedagogy, and should be supported by large scale statistical evidence. Our article aims at providing an initial step into this direction by first illustrating a teaching paradigm that is suited for the generation of large scale data sets: based on industry best practice quality assurance standards we introduce the Kaizen teaching paradigm which enforces Kolb’s reflective learning cycle on the students’ side. Second, we present and analyze the data we obtained through our pilot implementation at a engineering freshman mathematics course in the Sultanate of Oman. These emphasize the effectiveness of Kaizen teaching and once again show the necessity of continuous learning. A practice that seems to be forgotten in traditional university engineering courses due to the mere size of the audience. In particular it seems that a Markovian estimator for students’ performance may have to be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We refer to the literature, like Bostrm (2011), Coffield et al. (2004), Honey and Mumford (1986) for more details on the over 70 teaching styles that are currently subject to vivid discussion.

  2. As usual the term calculus refers to the set of recipes and is taught to students more or less in a form of copying a presented solution idea to another set of problems which may not even require an in depth understanding of the problem itself. Calculus consist of the basics and the correct way of applying formulas. Although calculus is an essential first step towards mathematics it is to be clearly separated from mathematics. Mathematics has the characteristics of a language for the sciences and demands the autonomous realization of solutions for problems of a previously unknown type. Thus the transfer of techniques has to be taught as well as the modeling of scientific and engineering scenarios.

  3. MUMIE is an acronym for “Multimedial Mathematics in Engineering” and was designed jointly by the RWTH Aachen, TU Berlin and TU Munich, see www.mumie.net for further information. The version used at GUtech enables users to explore and learn mathematics by themselves and gave students the chance to practice together with a full material collection of the lecture’s topics and definitions.

References

  • Ali AJ, Camp RC (1995) Teaching management in the Arab world: confronting illusions. Int J Educ Manag 9(2):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrm L (2011) Students’ learning styles compared with their teachers’ learning styles in secondary schools. Inst Learn Styles J 1:17–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers J, Cleveland W, Kleiner B, Tukey P (1983) Graphical methods for data analysis, Wadsworth

  • Coffield F, Ecclestone K, Hall E, Moseley D (2004) Learning styles and pedagogy. A systematic and critical review. Learn Skills Res Cent. www.lsrc.ac.uk

  • Dede S (2009) The teacher’s educational leadership roles according to Kolb’s theory of learning. Humanity Soc Sci J 4(2):153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn R, Dunn K (1998) The complete guide to the learning styles inservice system, Needham heights. Allyn and Bacon, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim B, Rupp F, Viet N, Stockhausen Pv, Gallenkämper J, Kreuzer J (2014) Driving student-centred calculus: results of a comprehensive case study for Kaizen-learning in the Sultanate of Oman. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 46(3):354–369

  • Honey P, Mumford A (1986) A manual of learning styles. Peter Honey, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard RA, Carver CA, Lane WD (1996) Felder’s learning styles, Bloom’s taxonomy, and the Kolb learning cycle: tying it all together in the cs2 course, SIGCSE ’95 2/96, Philadelphia, PA, pp 227–231

  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) (2011) TIMSS international results in mathematics, chap 2, TIMSS & PIRLS Lynch school of Education, Boston College

  • Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL (1978) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Duxbury Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb D (1984) Experiential Learning. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  • Lewin K (1951) Field theory and learning. In: Cartwright D (ed) Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. Social Science Paperbacks, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freedman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Opera J (2010) Multiethnic teaching methods in higher education: perception, practice, and benefits. J Multicult Educ 6(3):34–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez AL, Fahara MF (2010) Online teaching styles: a study in distance education. Int J Univ Teach Fac Dev 1(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp F, Brandmeier R (2010) Benchmarking procurement functions: causes for superior performance. Benchmarking Int J 17(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (2002) Angewandte statsitik—anwendung statistischer methoden, 11th edn. Springer, Berlin, New York, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidani YM, Thornberry J (2009) The current Arab work ethic: antecedents, implications and potential remedies. J Bus Ethics 91(1):35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svinicki MD, Dixon NM (1987) The Kolb model modified for classroom activities. Coll Teach 35(4):141–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas R (2012) Maths scores in Oman among weakest in the world: OECD, Muscat Daily, 1 April, Muscat

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl A für Mathematik, RWTH Aachen, 52056, Aachen, Germany

    Jonas Gallenkämper & Judith Kreuzer

  2. Department of Mathematics and Science, German University of Technology in Oman, Halban Campus, Muscat, Oman

    Bernhard Heim, Florian Rupp, Paul von Stockhausen & Nils Viet

Authors
  1. Jonas Gallenkämper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernhard Heim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judith Kreuzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Florian Rupp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul von Stockhausen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nils Viet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Gallenkämper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gallenkämper, J., Heim, B., Kreuzer, J. et al. Kaizen teaching and the learning habits of engineering students in a freshman mathematics course. Cent Eur J Oper Res 24, 1009–1030 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0416-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0416-5

Keywords