Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity changes in China’s high-tech industries: exploring convexity implications

  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high-tech industry, as a two-stage system consisting of technology development and economic transformation, plays an important role in the transformation and upgrading of China’s economic development. Productivity analysis is the primary method for assessing the performance of economic growth. Hence, it is important to accurately measure productivity changes, which can provide valuable guidance for its further development. Accordingly, based on the provincial-level sample data of the high-tech industry, this paper measures the productivity changes of the whole system and each stage by adopting Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen indices both under the convex and nonconvex measures. Further, a comparative analysis of productivity changes from the national and regional high-tech industry perspective has been performed. Empirical results suggest that productivity changes differ significantly among the national, Eastern, and Northeast regions only for the variable returns to scale assumption under the nonconvex measure, specifically for the whole system. Moreover, more contradictory results between Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen indices occur under variable returns to scale and nonconvex technology. Furthermore, productivity growth for the whole system is primarily attributed to that of the technology development stage, except for the Central region. In addition, the differences in productivity changes across regions are reduced. Finally, some constructive suggestions have been made so that policymakers can provide theoretical references when making decisions for the high-quality development of the high-tech industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An Q, Meng F, Xiong B, Wang Z, Chen X (2020) Assessing the relative efficiency of Chinese high-tech industries: a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. Ann Oper Res 290(1):707–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio J, López-Torres L, Santín D (2018) Economic crisis and public education. A productivity analysis using a Hicks–Moorsteen index. Econ Model 71:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjurek H (1996) The Malmquist total factor productivity index. Scand J Econ 98(2):303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W, Kerstens K (2009) Infeasibility and directional distance functions with application to the determinateness of the Luenberger productivity indicator. J Optim Theory Appl 141(1):55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W, Kerstens K (2011) The Hicks–Moorsteen productivity index satisfies the determinateness axiom. Manch Sch 79(4):765–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briec W, Kerstens K, Eeckaut P (2004) Non-convex technologies and cost functions: definitions, duality and nonparametric tests of convexity. J Econ 81(2):155–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves D, Christensen L, Diewert W (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50(6):1393–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles V, Diaz J, Aparicio J (2022) The performance of regional governments under the results-based budgeting framework: a two-stage sectoral analysis. RAIRO-Oper Res 56(2):501–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Wu H, Lin B (2006) Evaluating the development of high-tech industries: Taiwan’s science park. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(4):452–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Liu Z, Zhu Q (2018) Performance evaluation of China’s high-tech innovation process: analysis based on the innovation value chain. Technovation 74–75:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Kerstens K, Zhu Q (2021a) Exploring horizontal mergers in swedish district courts using convex and nonconvex technologies: usefulness of a conservative approach. Working paper 2021a-EQM-05, IESEG School of Management, Lille

  • Chen X, Liu X, Gong Z, Xie J (2021b) Three-stage super-efficiency DEA models based on the cooperative game and its application on the R&D green innovation of the Chinese high-tech industry. Comput Ind Eng 156:107234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Liu X, Wu Q et al (2022a) Measuring innovation efficiency using interval type-2 fuzzy super-efficiency slack-based measure approach. Eng Appl Artif Intell 116:105405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Liu X, Zhu Q (2022b) Comparative analysis of total factor productivity in China’s high-tech industries. Technol Forecast Soc Change 175:121332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deprins D, Simar L (1984) Measuring labor efficiency in post offices. The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurements, M. Marchand, P. Pestieau and H. Tulkens

  • Ding S (2019) A novel discrete grey multivariable model and its application in forecasting the output value of China’s high-tech industries. Comput Ind Eng 127:749–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan D, Gu X (2021) Analysis of the key influencing factors of technological innovation efficiency in high-tech industries: an empirical study based on the DEA-Malmquist and Bayesian Model Average approach. Sci Res Manag 43(1):226–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y, Ullah A (1999) On goodness-of-fit tests for weakly dependent processes using kernel method. J Nonparametr Stat 11(1–3):337–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soci: Ser A (gen) 120(3):253–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M (1959) The convexity assumption in the theory of competitive markets. J Polit Econ 67(4):377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84(1):66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G (2007) Network DEA// Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. Springer, Boston, pp 209–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira D, Marques R (2017) Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indexes for clusters performance evaluation. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 15(5):1015–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan J, Chen K (2010) Measuring the innovation production process: a cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations. Technovation 30(5–6):348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han C, Thomas S et al (2017) Evaluating R&D investment efficiency in China’s high-tech industry. J High Technol Manag Res 28(1):93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerstens K, Eeckaut P (1999) Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: a new method based on goodness-of-fit. Eur J Oper Res 113(1):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerstens K, Van de Woestyne I (2014) Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indices: exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data. Eur J Oper Res 233(3):749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerstens K, Van De Woestyne I (2021) Cost functions are nonconvex in the outputs when the technology is nonconvex: convexification is not harmless. Ann Oper Res 305(1–2):81–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoveyni M, Eslami R (2022) Two-stage network DEA with shared resources: illustrating the drawbacks and measuring the overall efficiency. Knowl-Based Syst 250:108725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremantzis M, Beullens P, Klein J (2022) A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure. Expert Syst Appl 187:115921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q (1996) Nonparametric testing of closeness between two unknown distribution functions. Econom Rev 15(3):261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Liu B, Liu W, Chiu Y (2017) Efficiency evaluation of the regional high-tech industry in China: a new framework based on meta-frontier dynamic DEA analysis. Socioecon Plann Sci 60:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Q (2020) Innovation efficiency of high-tech industries based on DEA-Malmquist index: case study of Fujian Province. Inf Res 7:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Sun J, Wang S (2019) Dynamic evaluation of the technological innovation efficiency of China’s industrial enterprises. Sci Public Policy 46(2):232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Lin R, Sun J et al (2021) Dynamically evaluating technological innovation efficiency of high-tech industry in China: Provincial, regional and industrial perspective. Socioecon Plann Sci 74:100939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Zhang J (2013) Analysis on innovation efficiency of the different capital type enterprises in high-tech industries-based on the three-stage DEA model. R&D Manag 24:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell C (2003) The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. J Prod Anal 20(3):437–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Q, Miao C, Sun L et al (2019) Efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation of China’s strategic emerging industries: an empirical analysis based on Malmquist-data envelopment analysis index. J Clean Prod 238:117782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trab Estad 4(2):209–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R, Hernández-Sancho F (2016) Development and application of the Hicks–Moorsteen productivity index for the total factor productivity assessment of wastewater treatment plants. J Clean Prod 112:3116–3123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell C (2008) An aggregate quantity-price framework for measuring and decomposing productivity and profitability change (No. WP072008). The University of Queensland, School of Economics

  • O’Donnell C (2012) An aggregate quantity framework for measuring and decomposing productivity change. J Prod Anal 38(3):255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoilenko S, Osei-Bryson K (2013) Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for monitoring efficiency-based performance of productivity-driven organizations: design and implementation of a decision support system. Omega 41(1):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf H (1994) The allocation of resources in the presence of indivisibilities. J Econ Perspect 8(4):111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva P, Moutinho V, Moreira A (2022) Do social and economic factors affect the technical efficiency in entrepreneurship activities? Evidence from European countries using a two-stage DEA model. Socioecon Plann Sci 82:101314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toloo M, Mensah EK, Salahi M (2022) Robust optimization and its duality in data envelopment analysis. Omega 108:102583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Chen F (2015) Analysis of China’s high-tech industry innovation efficiency based on the Hicks–Moorsteen index. Ind Econ Res 6:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Wang Y (2014) Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):2824–2831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Pang S, Ding L, Miao Z (2020a) Combining the biennial Malmquist–Luenberger index and panel quantile regression to analyze the green total factor productivity of the industrial sector in China. Sci Total Environ 739:140280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Pan J, Pei R et al (2020b) Assessing the technological innovation efficiency of China’s high-tech industries with a two-stage network DEA approach. Socioecon Plann Sci 71:100810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Tsai H, Cheng K, Lai M (2006) Assessment of intellectual capital management in Taiwanese IC design companies: using DEA and the Malmquist productivity index. R&D Manag 36(5):531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu A, Shi Y, You J, Zhu J (2021) Innovation performance evaluation for high-tech companies using a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. Eur J Oper Res 292(1):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Jiang Y (2021) Research on the innovation efficiency evaluation of China’s interprovincial high-tech industries. Sci Technol Ind 21(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Luo Y, Chiu Y (2019) Efficiency evaluation of China’s high-tech industry with a multi-activity network data envelopment analysis approach. Socioecon Plann Sci 66:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is inspired by the article of Kristiaan H.J. Kerstens. I sincerely thank him for his patient guidance in my academic life and for fostering a sense of creativity. The work is supported by the Key Project of Philosophy and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (2017ZDIXM014), and the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (71771051 and 72071045), the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST (2023r030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, Jiangsu, China

    Xiaoqing Chen

  2. School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, Jiangsu, China

    Xinwang Liu

  3. National School of Development and Policy of Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, Jiangsu, China

    Xinwang Liu

Authors
  1. Xiaoqing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinwang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinwang Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Liu, X. Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity changes in China’s high-tech industries: exploring convexity implications. Cent Eur J Oper Res 31, 1209–1237 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00853-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-023-00853-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation