Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A multi-equation spatial econometric model, with application to EU manufacturing productivity growth

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multi-equation spatial econometric model is used to explain variations across EU regions in manufacturing productivity growth based on recent theoretical developments in urban economics and economic geography. The paper shows that temporal and spatial parameter homogeneity is an unrealistic assumption, contrary to what is typically assumed in the literature. Constraints are imposed on parameters across time periods and between core and peripheral regions of the EU, with the significant loss of fit providing overwhelming evidence of parameter heterogeneity, although the final model does highlight increasing returns to scale, which is a central feature of contemporary theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Rahman H, Fujita M (1990) Product variety, Marshallian externalities, and city sizes. J Region Sci 30:65–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakman S, Garretsen H, van Marrewijk C (2001) An introduction to geographical economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone A, Hall R E (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86:54–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes P-P, Lafourcade M (2001) Transportation costs decline and regional inequalities: evidence from France. CEPR DP 2894

  • Combes P-P, Lafourcade M (2004) Trade costs and regional disparities in a model of economic geography: structural estimations and predictions for France. Unpublished paper available from http://www.enpc.fr/ceras/combes/

  • Combes P-P, Overman H (2003) The spatial distribution of economic activity in the EU. CEPR DP 3999

  • Dixit A, Stiglitz J E (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67:297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2000) Spatial econometrics, economic geography, dynamics and equilibrium: a third way? Environ Plan A 32:1481–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2001a) Equilibrium and economic growth: spatial econometric models and simulations. J Region Sci 41:117–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2001b) Theoretical economic geography and spatial econometrics: dynamic perspectives. J Econ Geogr 1:201–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2003) Increasing returns: evidence from local wage rates in Great Britain. Oxford Econ Pap 55:716–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2005a) Towards applied geographical economics: modelling relative wage rates, incomes and prices for the regions of Great Britain. Appl Econ 37:2417–2428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2005b) Beyond neoclassical orthodoxy: a view based on the new economic geography and UK regional wage data. Pap Region Sci 84:351–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B (2006) The new economic geography versus urban economics : an evaluation using local wage rates in Great Britain. Oxford Econ Pap 58:501–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B, McCann P (2007) Sinking the iceberg ? On the treatment of transport costs in new economic geography. In: B Fingleton (ed) New directions in economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 168–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingleton B, McCombie JSL (1998) Increasing returns and economic growth: Some evidence for manufacturing from the European Union regions. Oxford Econ Pap 50:89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Forslid R, Haaland J, Midelfart Knarvik K-H (2002) A U-shaped Europe? A simulation study of industrial location. J Int Econ 57:273–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse, J-F (1996) Economics of agglomeration. J Jpn Int Econ 10:339–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Head K, Mayer T (2003) The empirics of agglomeration and trade. CEPR DP 3985

  • Huriot J-M, Thisse J-F (eds) (2000) Economics of cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Jonathan Cape, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann P (2005) Transport costs and new economic geography. J Econ Geogr 5:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding S, Venables A J (2004) Economic geography and international inequality. J Int Econ 62:53–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice P, Venables A J (2003) Equilibrium regional disparities: theory and British evidence. Region Stud 37:675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Batiz F (1988) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and agglomeration economies in consumption and production. Region Sci Urban Econ 18:125–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Fingleton.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5

Table 5 Core and periphery values of G, L and U in each region

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fingleton, B. A multi-equation spatial econometric model, with application to EU manufacturing productivity growth. J Geograph Syst 9, 119–144 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-006-0038-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-006-0038-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation