Skip to main content
Log in

Separable spatial modeling of spillovers and disturbances

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The single spatial parameter in the spatial autoregressive model affects both the estimation of spillovers and the estimation of spatial disturbances. Consequently, the spatial autoregressive model has the undesirable property that if the degree of spatial dependence in the disturbances differs from that in the spillovers, neither may be estimated correctly. We show theoretically that the dependence structure for the spillovers and disturbances can differ and conduct a Monte Carlo experiment that verifies these findings. In contrast, estimates from a simple separable model show little bias in all the scenarios. We also show differences between the spatial autoregressive model and the separable model on five empirical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To maintain simplicity, we keep s as permanent and do not explore letting s be independent over time and space as that would create more scenarios to examine. However, this could certainly be done.

  2. We used Louisiana because it is one of the first states with data releases in the 2010 Census and because more effort than normal was spent in data collection due to concerns about population loss after Katrina.

References

  • Almon S (1965) The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures. Econometrica 33(1):178–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data, revised edition. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2001) Dynamic models in space and time. Geogr Anal 33(2):119–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spatial Econ Anal 5(1):9–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyck LM (1954) Distributed lags and investment analysis. North-Holland

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2007) A matrix exponential spatial specification. J Econ 140(1):190–214

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, Barry RP (1997) Quick computation of spatial autoregressive estimators. Geogr Anal 29(3):232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, LeSage JP (2002) Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimates of spatial dependence. Geogr Anal 34(1):76–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, LeSage JP (2008) A spatial Hausman test. Econ Lett 101(3):282–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, LeSage JP (2010) Spatial econometrics. Handbook of spatial statistics. CRC Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, LeSage JP, Zhu S (2010) Spatial dependence in regressors and its effect on estimator performance (manuscript)

  • Shiller RJ (1973) A distributed lag estimator derived from smoothness priors. Econometrica 41(4):775–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TE, LeSage JP (2004) A Bayesian probit model with spatial dependencies. In: LeSage JP, Pace RK (eds) Advances in econometrics: vol 18: spatial and spatiotemporal econometrics. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 127–160

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Kelley Pace.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pace, R.K., Zhu, S. Separable spatial modeling of spillovers and disturbances. J Geogr Syst 14, 75–90 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-011-0155-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-011-0155-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation