Skip to main content
Log in

Searching efficient plans for emergency rescue through simulation: the case of a metro fire

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present the way we modelled and simulated a metro system in the case of a tunnel fire, and discuss the ways this simulation may support the search for efficient rescue plans. The metro system was modelled as a complex adaptive system, comprising four interacting and co-evolving subsystems: (i) the fire and the released smoke, (ii) the group of passengers, (iii) the technological system, and (iv) the metro personnel. Based on this model, an agent-based simulation was developed. This simulation provides an appropriate dynamic representation of the designer’s problem space, enabling him (i) to apprehend the critical dependencies and invariants of the system under consideration, (ii) to identify the features that should characterise the designed emergency rescue plans, and (iii) to assess their efficiency. To demonstrate the usefulness of the adopted approach for the design of an efficient emergency rescue plan, the results of two experiments exploring alternative sequences of the metro personnel’s actions under different circumstances are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod R (1997a) Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. Complexity 3(2):16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1997b) The complexity of cooperation. In: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Bernon C, Camps V, Gleizes MP, Glize P (2001) La Conception de Systèmes Multi-Agents adaptifs: contraintes et Spécificités. http://www.irit.fr/ACTIVITES/EQ_SMI/SMAC/home.html

  • Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Camazine S (1997) Self-organisation in social insects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:188–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casti JL (1997) Would-be worlds. How simulation is changing the frontiers of science. Wiley, New York

  • Casti JL (1999) The computer as a laboratory: toward a theory of complex, adaptive systems. Complexity 4(5):12–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1984) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

  • Cheng LH, Ueng TH, Liu CW (2001) Simulation of ventilation and fire in the under-ground facilities. Fire Safety J 36:597–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi TY, Dooley KJ, Rungtusanatham M (2001) Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence. J Oper Manag 19:351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P (1998) Complexity & postmodernism. Taylor and Francis, London

  • Diamantidis D, Zuccarelli F, Westhäuser A (2000) Safety of long railway tunnels. Reliability Eng Syst Safety 67:135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drysdale D (1997) An introduction to fire dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

  • Dugdale J, Pavard B, Subie J-L (2000) A pragmatic development of a computer simulation of an emergency call centre. In: De Michelis G. et al (eds) Designing cooperative systems, Proceedings of COOP’2000. IOS Press, Amsterdam

  • Gann RG, Babrauskas V, Peackock RD, Hall JR Jr (1994) Fire conditions for fire toxicity measurement. Fire Mater 18:193–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. In: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control and artificial intelligence, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Hollnagel E (2002) Time and time again. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 3(2):143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1996) At home in the universe. The search for laws of complexity. Penguin Science, London

  • Le Bon G (1971) Psychologie des Foules, nouvelle édition, 2e tirage. PUF, Paris

  • Nathanael D, Marmaras N, Papantoniou B, Zarboutis N (2002) Socio-technical systems analysis: which approach should be followed? In: Bagnara S et al (eds) Cognition, culture and design, Proceedings of the ECCE-11, Catania, 11–13 September 2002, pp 137–142

  • Purser DA (1992) The evolution of toxic effluents in fires and the assessment of toxic hazard. Toxicol Lett 64/65:247–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser DA (2000) Toxic product yields and hazard assessment for fully enclosed design fires. Polym Int 49(10):1,232–1,255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Railsback SF (2001) Concepts from complex adaptive systems as a framework for individual-based modelling. Ecol Model 139:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M (2000) Managing complexity-the path toward intelligent organizations. Syst Pract Action Res 13(2):207–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Xue H, Ho JC, Cheng YM (2001) Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation. Fire Safety J 36:37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Marmaras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zarboutis, N., Marmaras, N. Searching efficient plans for emergency rescue through simulation: the case of a metro fire. Cogn Tech Work 6, 117–126 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0150-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0150-6

Keywords

Navigation