Skip to main content
Log in

Some critical issues when studying behavioural adaptations to new driver support systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past 15 years major technological changes have taken place in the field of automotive technology, in particular with the design and implementation of new driver support and information management systems. The development of these new systems raises crucial questions at a technical level as well as in terms of their consequences on driver activity. A major concern is about the “behavioural adaptations” that may occur in response to the introduction of these systems in the driving task and their impacts on road safety. Within the European Project Adaptive Integrated Driver–vehicle InterfacE (AIDE), a specific research activity is dedicated to the identification of crucial behavioural adaptation aspects associated with the use of new driver support systems and of the specification of most relevant parameters that can be implemented in models for supporting design and safety assessment processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. AIDE (Adaptive Integrated Driver–vehicle InterfacE) is a EC funded project of the 6th Framework Programme, Project No. IST-1-507674-IP

References

  • Allen T, Lunenfeld H, Alexander G (1971) Driver information needs. Highway Res Rec 366:102–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Almqvist S, Nygard M (1997) Dynamic speed adaptation: a field trial with automatic speed adaptation in an urban area. Bulletin 154, Lund Institute of Technology, Dept. of traffic Planning and engineering, University of Lund, Sweden

  • Amalberti R (1996) La conduite des systèmes à risques. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ID (1985) Concepts and definitions in road safety. In: Biecheler MB, Lacombe C, Mulhrad N (eds) Evaluation 85, proceedings of the international meeting on the evaluation of local traffic safety measures. Paris, France, pp 413–422

  • Cacciabue PC, Hollnagel E (2005) Mental model of drivers: a review of criteria, variables, and parameters. In: Macchi L, Re C, Cacciabue PC (eds) Modelling driver behaviour in automotive environments, Proceedings of HUMANIST Workshop. Ispra, Italy, pp 185–196

  • Carsten O, Fowkes M (2000) External vehicle speed control. Executive summary of project results. University of Leeds, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte S (2000) New systems: new behaviour? Transport Res Part F 3:95–111

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans L (1985) Human behavior feedback and traffic safety. Hum Factors 27(5):555–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough SH, May AJ, Carter C (1997) The effect of time headway feedback on following behaviour. Accid Anal Prev 29(3):387–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fancher F, Ervin R, Sayer J, Hagan M, Bogard S, Bareket Z, Mefford M, Haugen J (1998) Intelligent cruise control field operation test. Final Report. NHTSA Report No. DOT HS 808 849

  • French DJ, West RJ, Elander J, Wilding JM (1993) Decision-making, driving style, and self-reported involvement in road traffic accidents. Ergonomics 36(6):627–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson GB (1996) Behavioural adaptation: a review of the literature. TRL Report 254, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England

  • Hjälmdahl M, Varhelyi A (2004) Effects of an active accelerator pedal on driver behaviour and traffic safety after long-term use in urban areas. Accid Anal Prev 36:729–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoedemaeker M, Brookhuis K (1998) Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transport Res Part F 1:95–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoedemaeker M, Kopf M (2001) Visual sampling behaviour when driving with adaptive cruise control. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on vision in vehicles. Australia

  • Hogema JH, Janssen WH (1996) Effects of intelligent cruise control on driving behaviour: a simulator study. TNO report TM-96-C012, TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands

  • Jonah BA, Thiessen R, Au-Yeung E (2001) Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. Accid Anal Prev 33:679–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kopf M, Nirschl G (1997) Driver–vehicle interaction while driving with ACC in borderline situations. In: Proceedings of the 4th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Berlin, Germany

  • Kopf M, Simon J (2001) A Concept for a learn-adaptive advanced driver assistance system. In: Proceedings of the conference on cognitive science approaches 2001, Neubiberg

  • Malaterre G, Saad F (1986) Les aides à la conduite : définitions et évaluation. Exemple du radar anti-collision. Le Travail Humain 49(4):333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstetten D, Krautter W, Engeln A, Zahn P, Simon J, Kuhn F, Frank P, Junge M, Lehrach K, Buld S (2003) Learnability of driver assistance systems - invent fvm- driver behavior and human machine interaction. In: Proceedings of the 10th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Madrid, Spain

  • Michon JA (1993) Generic intelligent driver support, a comprehensive report on GIDS. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir BM (1987) Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. Int J Aviat Psychol 8:47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson L (1995) Safety effects of adaptive cruise controls in critical traffic situations. In: Proceedings of the 2nd world congress on intelligent transport systems, Yokohama, Japan, pp 1254–1259

  • Nilsson L, Nåbo A (1996) Evaluation of application 3: intelligent cruise control simulator experiment. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping

  • Nilsson L, Harms L, Peters B (2002) The effect of road transport telematics. In: Barjonnet P (eds) Traffic psychology today. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 265–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy I (1997) Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1990) Behavioural adaptations to changes in the road transport system. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

  • Parkes AM, Franzen SF (1993) Driving future vehicles. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson H, Towliat M, Almqvist S, Risser R, Magdeburg M (1993) Speed limiters for cars. A field study of driving speeds, driver behaviour, traffic conflicts and comments by drivers in town and city traffic. Report of Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund

  • Regan MA, Mitsopoulos E, Tomasevic N, Healy D, Connelly K, Williams L (2001) Behavioural adaptation to in-car ITS technologies: update on the Australian TAC safecar project. In: Proceedings of the 8th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Sydney, Australia

  • Rudin-Brown CM, Noy I (2003) Investigation of behavioral adaptation to lane departure warning. Transport Res Rec 1803:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudin-Brown CM, Parker HA (2004) Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transport Res Part F 7:59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad F, Malaterre G (1982) Régulation de la vitesse: aide au contrôle de la vitesse. Synthèse. Rapport ONSER

  • Saad F, Villame T (1996) Assessing new driving support systems - Contribution of an analysis of drivers’ activity in real situations. In: Proceedings of the third annual world congress on intelligent transport systems, Orlando, USA

  • Saad F, Villame T (1999) Intégration d’un nouveau système d’assistance dans l’activité des conducteurs d’automobile. In: Ganascia J-G (ed) Sécurité et cognition. Editions Hermes, Paris, pp 105–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad F, Mundutéguy C, Darses F (1999) Managing interactions beetween car drivers : an essential dimension of reliable driving. In: Proceedings of seventh european conference on cognitive science approaches to process control (CSAPC’99), Villeneuve d’Ascq, France. Presses Universitaires de Valenciennes, pp 99–104

  • Saad F, Hjälmdahl M, Cañas J, Alonso M, Garayo P, Macchi L, Nathan F, Ojeda L, Papakostopoulos V, Panou M, Bekiaris A (2004) Literature review—analysis of behavioural changes induced by ADAS and IVIS. AIDE Project, Deliverable D1_2_1

  • Saad F, Bekiaris A, Carsten O, Hjälmdahl, Hoedemaker M, Ojeda L, Papakostopoulos V, Nathan F, Vezier B (2005) General experimental plan for short and long term behavioural assessment. AIDE project IST-1–507674-IP, Deliverable D1_2_2

  • Smiley A (2000) Behavioural adaptation, safety and intelligent transportation systems. Transport Res Rec 1724:47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton NA, Young M, McCaulder B (1997) Drive-by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Saf Sci 27(2/3):149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman LA (1987) Plans and situated actions. The problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Törnros J, Nilsson L, Östlund J, Kircher A (2002) Effects of ACC on driver behaviour, workload and acceptance in relation to minimum time headway. In: Proceedings of the 9th world congress on intelligent transport systems, Chicago, IL, USA

  • Várhelyi A, Mäkinen T (2001) The effects of in-car speed limiters: field studies. Transportation Research Part C 9(3):191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward NJ, Fairclough S, Humphreys M (1995) The effect of task automatisation in the automotive context: a field study of an autonomous intelligent cruise control system. In: Garland DJ, Endsley MR (eds) Experimental analysis and measurements of situational awareness. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press, Daytona Beach, pp 369–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger M, Winner H, Bubb H (2001) Adaptive cruise control field operational test—the learning phase. JSAE Rev 22:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young M, Stanton NA (2002) Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance. Hum Factors 44(3):365–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young MS, Stanton NA (2004) Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload. Ergonomics 47(9):1014–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farida Saad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saad, F. Some critical issues when studying behavioural adaptations to new driver support systems. Cogn Tech Work 8, 175–181 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0035-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0035-y

Keywords

Navigation