Skip to main content
Log in

Time windows-based team performance measures: a framework to measure team performance in dynamic environments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a framework for implementing Team Performance Measures based on a temporal accuracy measure called the relative accuracy index (RAI) to evaluate and compare team performance in a command-and-control human-in-the-loop simulation. The framework allows researchers to collect and analyze team outcomes in an unbiased objective manner based on a temporal performance measure known as a Time Window. Our framework provides experimenters and subject matter experts the necessary tools to evaluate performance in terms of task demands. We also provide a sample analysis of individual and team performance using the RAI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhandarkar D, Thiruvengada H, Rothrock L, Campbell GE, Bolton AE (2004) TASP: a toolkit to analyze team performance in a complex task environment. In: Paper presented at the annual conference of the Institute of Industrial Engineers, Houston

  • Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I (1999) The unified modeling language user guide. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton AE, Campbell GE, Buff WL, Rothrock L, Bhandarkar D, Thiruvengada H, Kukreja U (2004) TASP: A flexible alternative for team training and performance research. In: Paper presented at the interservice/industry training, simulation and education conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando

  • Brannick M, Prince C (1997) An overview of team performance measurement. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds). Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds) (1997) Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

  • Brehmer B (1990) Strategies in real-time dynamic decision making. In: Hogarth RM (ed) Insights in decision making: a tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 262–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer B, Allard R (1991) Dynamic decision making: the effects of task complexity and feedback delays. In: Rasmussen J, Brehmer B, Leplat J (eds). Distributed decision making: cognitive models for cooperative work. Wiley, New York, pp 319–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs GE, Johnston WA (1967) Team training (NTDC technical report No. 1327–4). Naval Training Device Center, Orlando

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1997a) Teamwork competencies: the intersection of team member knowledge, skills, and attitudes. In: O’Neil HF (ed) Workforce readiness: competencies and assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (1997b) A framework for developing team performance measures in training. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds). Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 45–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers JA, Tannenbaum SI, Salas E, Volpe CE (1995) Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In: Guzzo RA, Salas E (eds). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. Jossey-Bass publishers, San Francisco, pp 333–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson TL, McIntyre RM (1998) A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds). Team performance measurement and assessment: theory, methods and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 19–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Green DM, Swets JA (1988) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Peninsula publishing, Los Altos

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson CJ, Mendel RW, Gibson FW (1981) Clarifying performance appraisal criteria. Organ Behav Hum Perform 28(2):164–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirlik A, Fisk AD, Walker N, Rothrock L (1998) Feedback augmentation and part-task practice in training dynamic decision-making skills. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds). Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 91–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy G, Beatty R, Bernardin J (1987) Unanswered questions in assessment center research. J Bus Psychol 2:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre RM, Salas E (1995) Measuring and managing for team performance: emerging principles from complex environments. In: Guzzo RA, Salas E (eds). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. Jossey-Bass publishers, San Francisco, pp 149–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosier KL (1997) Myths of expert decision making and automated decision making aids. In: Zsambok C, Klein G (eds). Naturalistic Decision Making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt S (1999) Ten myths of multimodal interaction. Commun ACM 42(11):74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothrock L (2001) Using time windows to evaluate operator performance. Int J Cogn Ergon, 5(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothrock L, Harvey C, Burns J (2005) A theoretical framework and quantitative architecture to assess team task complexity in dynamic environments. Theoret Issue Ergon Sci 6(2):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett PR, Dreher GF (1982) Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings. J Appl Psychol 67:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch KA, Johnston JH, Payne SC (1998a) Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds). Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 61–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch KA, Zeisig RL, Acton B, McPherson JA (1998b) Team dimensional training: a strategy for guided team self-correction. In: Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (eds). Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 271–297

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swets JA (1996) Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruvengada H, Bhandarkar DN, Kukreja U, Rothrock L (2004) TASP: a toolkit for human experimentation in a synthetic environment with a hybrid human-agent team. In: Paper presented at behavior research in modeling and simulation (BRIMS) Conference, Crystal City

  • Thiruvengada H, Bhandarkar DN, Rothrock L (2006) Time windows-based team performance measures: design and implementation. In: Paper to be presented at 2006 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, Taipei

  • Thiruvengada H, Rothrock L (2006) Team training. In: Nembhard D (ed) Workforce cross training handbook. CRC, Boca Raton (in press)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Office of Naval Research under Contract No. N61339-05–C–0031. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Naval Research. We wish to thank Gwendolyn Campbell, Amy Bolton, Wendi Vanbuskirk and Damodar Bhandarkar for their valuable insights, which enabled the successful development of our framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Rothrock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thiruvengada, H., Rothrock, L. Time windows-based team performance measures: a framework to measure team performance in dynamic environments. Cogn Tech Work 9, 99–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0046-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0046-8

Keywords

Navigation