Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing universal access: web-applications for the elderly and disabled

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Throughout a person’s life they are likely to experience some degree of impairment. What must be ensured is that these individuals can benefit from the opportunities afforded by technology in the same way as those who are able bodied. With the Internet becoming an increasingly popular medium for organizations to deliver information and services to the public many of these technological benefits are provided through web applications. However, due to possible visual, physical or cognitive impairments, older users and those with disabilities are more likely to experience difficulties. This paper addresses issues relating to usability of web applications for elderly and disabled users and investigates ways in which it can be improved, and whether doing so will affect usability for younger and more able users. Results from experiments undertaken indicated that it was possible to develop a web application for elderly and disabled users without degrading usability for other users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker SA (2004) A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact (TOCHI) 11:387–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker SA, Berkemeyer A (2002) Rapid application design and testing of web usability. IEEE Multimedia 9(4):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker SA, Mottay FE (2001) A global perspective on web site usability. IEEE Softw 18:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter J, Markel M, Marketron I, Hailey ID (2001) Web accessibility for people with disabilities: an introduction for web developers. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 44(4):225–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick-Dias A, McNulty M, Tullis T (2003) Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on universal usability, Vancouver, pp 30–36

  • Chisholm W, Vanderheiden G, Jacobs I (2001) Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Interactions 8(4):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czerwinski M, Horvitz E, Cutrell E (2001) Subjective duration assessment: an implicit probe for software usability. In: Proceedings of IHM-HCI 2001 conference 2:167–170

  • Fink J, Kobsa A, Nill A (1998) Adaptable and adaptive information provision for all users, including disabled and elderly people. New Rev Hypermedia Multimedia 4:163–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frøkjær E, Hertzum M, Hornbæk K (2000) Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, The Hague, pp 345–352

  • Hanson VL (2001) Institutional and web activities: web access for elderly citizens. In: Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF workshop on universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing: providing for the elderly, Alccer do Sal, pp 14–18

  • Hawthorn D (2003) The ageing user: How universal is good design for older users? In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on universal usability, Vancouver, pp 38–45

  • Huang CJ (2003) Usability of E-government web-sites for people with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Big Island, pp 147–157

  • Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2003) Countering design exclusion through inclusive design. In: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on universal usability, Vancouver, pp 69–76

  • Loiacono E, McCoy S (2004) Web site accessibility: an online sector analysis. Inf Technol People 17(1):87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandl R (1985) Orthogonal Latin squares: an application of experiment design to compiler testing. Commun ACM 28(10):1054–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerurkar U (2001) Web user interface design: forgotten lessons. IEEE Softw 18(6):69–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell AF, Gregor P (2000) User sensitive inclusive design—in search of a new paradigm. In: Proceedings on the 2000 conference on universal usability, Arlington, pp 39–44

  • Newell AF, Gregor P (2002) Design for older and disabled people-where do we go from here? Universal Access Inf Soc 2(1):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (1997) The difference between web design and GUI design. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9705a.html (retrieved 16 January 2004)

  • Nielsen J (1999) User interface directions for the web. Commun ACM 42(1):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (2000) Designing web usability. New riders, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J (2001) Beyond accessibility: treating users with disabilities as people. Jakob Nielsen’s alertbox. http://www.useit.com /alertbox/20011111.html (retrieved 24 November 2003)

  • Nielsen J, Molich R (1990) Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: empowering people, Seattle, pp 249–256

  • Paciello MG (2000) Web accessibility for people with disabilities. CMP, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer J (2002) Designing for web site usability. Computer 35(7):102–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prager JH (1999) People with disabilities are next consumer niche. Wall Street J http://www.lbln.org/news/Eletconsumnich.doc (retrieved 25 November 2003)

  • Rowan M, Gregor P, Sloan D, Booth P (2000) Evaluating web resources for disability access. In: Proceedings of the fourth international ACM conference on assistive technologies, Arlington, pp 80–84

  • Sullivan T, Matson R (2000) Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the web’s most popular sites. In: Proceedings on the conference on universal usability 2000 on conference on universal usability, Arlington, pp 139–144

  • United Nations (2005) World population prospects: the 2004 revision, United Nations

  • Worden A, Walker N, Bharat K, Hudson S (1997) Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, pp 266–271

  • Wroblewski L, Rantanen EM (2001) Design considerations for web-based applications. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 45th annual meeting, Minneapolis, pp 1191–1195

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK

    Robert Johnson & Simon Kent

Authors
  1. Robert Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simon Kent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, R., Kent, S. Designing universal access: web-applications for the elderly and disabled . Cogn Tech Work 9, 209–218 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0063-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0063-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation