Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Core task analysis in accident investigation: analysis of maritime accidents in piloting situations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the difficulties in utilising accident analysis as the basis for the development of complex socio-technical systems, and how to improve accident analysis to better meet such aims. It focuses on two themes: accident models and experts’ involvement in accident investigation. The article describes the development of a new core task analysis-based method for accident analysis. It also elaborates on the method by presenting summarising results of an investigation in which several maritime accidents were first analysed case-by-case, followed by a comparative analysis and a synthesis. The latter phases aimed at providing evident-based generic explanations for the accidents. The accidents occurred in Finnish coastal waters during sea or canal piloting between 1997 and 2000. The authors participated in both phases of the investigation for which the Finnish Accident Investigation Board was responsible. The presented method is argued to promote solutions to two current problems in accident investigation: generalisation from the results, and integration of the experts’ work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Notes

  1. C 11/1997 M, C 4/1998 M and C 5/1998 M also available in English (http://www.onnettomuustutkinta.fi/2601.htm)

  2. The different interactions (table 2): op = operator-process; oo = operator-operator and ei = expert identity, to own actions.

References

  • AIB 2/1993. ATC incident at Helsinki-Vantaa airport, Finland, on 29 October 1993

  • AIB B 8/1997 L. ATC Incidents near Vihti VOR Radio Beacon, Finland, on 25 October 1997 and on 20 August 1997

  • AIB C 11/1997 M. Ms GRIMM, grounding outside port of Kotka, 1 October 1997

  • AIB C 15/1997 M. Ms MARIE LEHMANN, grounding on the fairway to Tammisaari, 21 November 1997

  • AIB C 16/1997 Mt CRYSTAL AMETHYST, grounding off Mussalo harbour in Kotka, on 1 December 1997

  • AIB C 1/1998 Pusher barge MEGA/MOTTI, grounding at Airisto on 5 January 1998

  • AIB C 4/1998 M. Ms. GERDA, grounding outside port of Kotka, 7 April 1998

  • AIB C5/1998 M. Ms BALTIC MERCHANT, grounding in Puumala at Hätinvirta, 21 April 1998

  • AIB C 9/1998 M. Ms CHRISTA, grounding off Kotka, 23 November 1998

  • AIB C 13/1998. Ms TRENDEN, grounding off Rauma, 17 December 1998

  • AIB C 11/1998 M. Ms GARDWIND, grounding off Kotka, 5 December 1998

  • AIB C 2/2000 M. Ms AURORA, dangerous incident and grounding south of Helsinki pilot station Harmaja on 6 March 2000

  • AIB S 1/2005 M. Explaining maritime accidents—practices and cultures of piloting. English summary

  • Arbeitskreis “Kapitän/Lotse” 1995. Schiff and Hafen No 2/96

  • Botting RM, Johnson CW (1998) A formal and structured approach to the use of task analysis in accident modelling. Int J Hum Comput Stud 49(3):223–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpignano A, Piccini M (1999) Cognitive theories and engineering approaches for safety assessment and design of automated systems: a case study of a power plant. Cogn Technol Work 1:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clot Y, Fernandez G, Carles L (2002) Crossed self-confrontation in the ‘clinic of activity’. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on cognitive ergonomics, pp 13–18

  • Dekker SWA (2002) Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. J Saf Res 33(3):371–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1999) The quest for certainty. A study of the relation of knowledge and action (Finnish translation). Gaudeamus, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Diestel HH (1996) Lotse als Team-Leader? Schiff and Halfen No 3/96

  • Engeström Y (1987) Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (1999) Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In: Engeström Y et al (eds) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahlbruch B (2000) Vom Unfall zu den Ursachen. Empirische Bewertung von Analyseverfahren. Maschinenbau und Produktionstechnik. Technische Universitä, Berlin 185

  • Gauthereau V (2003) Work practice, safety and heedfulness. Studies of organizational reliability in hospitals and nuclear power plants. Unitryck, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M (1990) Reading ethnographic research: a critical guide. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2002) Understanding accidents—from root causes to performance variability. In: IEEE 7th Human Factors Meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, 2002

  • Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate, Cornwall

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland J, Rohsenow DJ, Cote J, Gomez B, Mangione T, Laramie AK (2001) Effects of low-dose alcohol exposure on simulated merchant ship piloting by maritime cadets. Accid Anal Prev 33(2):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hukki K, Norros L (1998) Subject-centered and systemic conceptualization as a tool of simulator training. Trav Hum 4:313–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (2000) The perception of the environment. Essays on livelyhood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CW, Botting RM (1999) Using Reason’s model of organisational accidents in formalising accident reports. Cogn Technol Work 1:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemola U-M, Norros L (1997) Analysis of the clinical behaviour of anaesthetists: recognition of uncertainty as a basis for practice. Med Educ 31:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen L, Kines P (2002) Multidisciplinary in-depth investigations of head-on and left-turn road collisions. Accid Anal Prev 34:367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontjev (1978) Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2004) A new accident model for engineering safer systems, Saf Sci 42(4):237–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz R (1997) Naturalistic decision making perspectives on decision error. In: Zsambok K, Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah pp 151–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lützhöft M (2004) “The technology is great when it works”. Maritime technology and human integration on the ship’s bridge. Linköping studies in science and technology. Dissertation No. 907. Unitryck, Linköping

  • MacIntyre A (1984) After virtue: study in moral theory. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J, Wright P, Cooke M (2004) From information processing to dialogical meaning making: an experimental approach to cognitive ergonomics. Cogn Technol Work 6:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti P (2000) The choice of the unit of analysis for modelling real work settings. Cogn Technol Work 2(2):62–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L (2004) Acting under uncertainty. The core-task analysis in ecological study of work. VTT Publications 546, Espoo

  • Norros L, Hukki K (1998) Utilization of information technology in navigational decision-making. In: Waern Y (eds) Co-operative process management. Taylor & Francis, London pp 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Klemola U-M (2005) Naturalistic analysis of anaesthetists’ clinical practice. In: Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B (Eds) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 395–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (1999) Development of an approach to analysis of air traffic controllers’ working practices. In: Human error, safety and system development, Liege, BE, 7–8 June 1999

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (2002) The concept of the core task and the analysis of working practices. In: Boreham N, Samurcay R, Fischer M (eds) Work process knowledge. Routledge, London pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (2005) Performance-based usability evaluation of a safety information and alarm system. Int J Hum Comput Stud 63(3):328–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norros L, Hukki K, Haapio A, Hellevaara M (1998) Decision making on bridge in pilotage situations. Research report in Finnish. Summary in English. VTT research report 833, Espoo

  • Nuutinen M (2000) Working practice and safety culture in nuclear power plant operations. In: Vanttola T et al (eds) FINNUS. The Finnish Research Programme on Nuclear Power Plant Safety. Interium Report 1999–August 2000. VTT Research Notes 2057, VTT, Espoo

  • Nuutinen M (2005a) Expert identity construct in analysing prerequisites for expertise development: a case study in nuclear power plant operators’ on-the-job training. Cogn Technol Work 7(4):288–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen M (2005b) Contextual assessment of working practices in changing work. Int J Ind Ergon 35:905–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuutinen M (2004) Challenges of remote expert services. Modelling work and competence demands at the case study. Research report in Finnish. Summary in English. VTT research report

  • Nuutinen M Norros L (2001) Co-operation on bridge in piloting situations: analysis of 13 accidents on Finnish fairways. In: Onken R (ed) CSAPC’01. 8th conference on cognitive science approaches to process control. “The cognitive work process: automation and interaction”. Munich, Sept 24–26 2001, pp 3–13

  • Oedewald P, Reiman T (2003) Core task modelling in cultural assessment. A case study in nuclear power plant maintenance. Cogn Technol Work 5:283–293. doi:10.1007/s10111-003-0132-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1903/1998) The Harvard lectures on pragmatism: the essential pierce. Selected philosophical writings, vol 2. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pålsson U (1997) Lots omboard—även I framtiden? samarbete mellan lots och fartygsbefäl. Svensk Sjöfarts tidning no 6–7

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human–machine interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1996) Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Key note address: Conference on Human Interaction with Complex Systems, Dayton Ohio

  • Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27(2/3):183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J, Svedung I (2000) Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad, Sweden

  • Reason J (1998) Managing the risk of organizational accidents. Ashgate, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman T, Norros L (2002) Regulatory culture: balancing the different demands of regulatory practice in the nuclear industry. In: Kirwan B, Hale AR, Hopkins A (eds) Changing regulation—controlling risks in society. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman T, Oedewald P (2004) Measuring maintenance culture and maintenance core task with CULTURE-questionnaire—a case study in the power industry. Saf Sci 42:859–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman LA (1987) Plans and situated actions: the problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson O (2001) Accident and incident analysis based on the accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model. Cogn Technol Work 3:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Safety Board of Canada (1995) A study of operational relationship between ship masters/watchkeeping officers and marine pilots. no SM9501. Hull, Quebec

  • van der Schaaf T, Kanse L (2004). Biases in incident reporting databases: an empirical study in the chemical process industry. Saf Sci 42(1):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods D (1994) Behind human error: cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight. Cseriac Soar, 94-01 Army Navy Air Force FAA Nato. Wright-Patterson, Ohio

  • Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society. the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the investigation team for good times, flaming cooperation and many fruitful discussions during the work. The team comprised Administrative Director Pirjo Valkama-Joutsen, Chief Maritime Accident Investigator Martti Heikkilä and Maritime Accident Investigator Sea Captain Risto Repo from the Accident Investigation Board, Director Sea Captain Antti Haapio from the Maritime Safety Training Centre, Sea Captain (emeritus) Kari Larjo, and psychologist Kristiina Hukki, and the authors from VTT. We also wish to give special thanks to Sea Captain Kari Larjo for his admirable maritime expertise, which made the world of the sea approachable. We also appreciate the comments on our approach from those who participated in the Risky Work workshop in Paris in 2003. The work on the accident investigation and the summarising of its results were funded by AIB. This work was funded by VTT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. VTT, P.O. Box 1000, 02044, VTT, Finland

    Maaria Nuutinen & Leena Norros

Authors
  1. Maaria Nuutinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leena Norros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maaria Nuutinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nuutinen, M., Norros, L. Core task analysis in accident investigation: analysis of maritime accidents in piloting situations. Cogn Tech Work 11, 129–150 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0104-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0104-x

Keywords