Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Integrating quality-in-use in the IS acquisition process: an activity perspective

  • Original article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the normative and intentional issues of ensuring quality-in-use of large-scale information systems (IS) in the services sector. A descriptive model for observing the dynamics between key actors during system acquisition is proposed. The model supports the conceptualization of project dynamics in terms of different actors’ capability (power, capacity and knowledge) and perspectives (business, technical and human activity). A retrospective analysis of two case studies is performed using this model: different actors involved are identified and the interplay between them is analysed. Interpreting from the case studies, it is argued that ensuring a balance among perspectives is instrumental in arriving at usable systems. This paper contends that ensuring quality-in-use entails a normative part, which can be dealt with by methods and tools and an intentional part which cannot be prescribed, but can be influenced by facilitating the discourse between perspectives from the procurement stage and as the project unfolds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Abran A, Khelifi A, Suryn W (2003) Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Softw Qual J 11:325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Artman H, Zäll S (2005) Finding a way to usability: procurement of a taxi dispatch system. Cognit Technol Work 7(3):141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison DE, Wood-Harper AT (1990) Multiview—an exploration in information systems development. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon LJ, Bødker S (1991) Beyond the interface: encountering artifacts in use. In: Carroll J (ed) Designing interaction: psychology at the human–computer interface. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeson I, Green S, Sa J, Sully A (2002) Linking business processes and information systems provision in a dynamic environment. Inf Syst Front 4(3):317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benchekroun H, Pavard B, Salembier P (1995) Design of cooperative systems in complex dynamic environments. In: Hoc JM et al (eds) Expertise and technology: cognition and human–computer cooperation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan N (1999) Quality in use: meeting user needs for quality. J Syst Softw 49(1):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billings CE (1992) Human-centered aircraft automation: a concept and guidelines. NASA Technical Memorandum 103885. NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S (1991) Through the interface—a human activity approach to user interface design. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm B (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Comput 21:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivie I, Åborg C, Persson J, Löfberg M (2003) Why usability gets lost or usability in in-house software development. Interact Comput 15(4):623–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. John Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarito-Mazzarella J (2001) Usability is increasingly pivotal to e-business success. Research Note SPA-13-8807. Gartner Inc., Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper A (1999) The inmates are running the asylum. SAMS publishing, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne RD (1995) Designing information technology in the postmodern age. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Earthy JV, Sherwood-Jones B, Bevan N (2001) The improvement of human-centred processes—facing the challenge and reaping the benefit of ISO 13407. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(4):553–586

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eason K (1988) Information technology and organisational change. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y (1999) Activity theory and transformation. In: Engeström Y et al (eds) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan W, Freeman RE (1993) A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In: Beauchamp T, Norman B (eds) Ethical theory and business. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasson S (2003) Human-centered vs. user-centered approaches to information system design. J Inf Technol Theory Appl 5(2):29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasson S (2008) A framework for the co-design of business and IT systems. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-41)

  • Goguen JA (1997) Towards a social, ethical theory of information. In: Bowker G, et al. (eds) Social science research, technical systems and cooperative work: beyond the great divide. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 27–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin J (1991) The development of interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users. IEEE Comput 24:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin J, Poltrock SE (1997) Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware. In: Zelkowitz M (ed) Advances in computers. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulliksen J, Göransson B, Boivie I, Blomkvist S, Persson J, Cajander Å (2003) Key principles for user-centered systems design. Behav Inf Technol 22(6):397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundry AJ (1988) Humans, computers, and contracts. In: Jones DM, Winder R (eds) People and computers IV. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action: Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmlid S, Artman H (2004) Shared object—asymmetrical and conflicting objectives. In: Bertelsen O et al (eds) Proceedings of the first international workshop on activity theory based practical methods for IT design. ATIT, pp 64–70

  • Iivari N, Abrahamsson P (2002) The interaction between organizational subcultures and user-centered design—a case study of an implementation effort. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-35 02)

  • ISO/IEC 9126 (1991) Software product evaluation—quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO/IEC 9126-1 (2001) Information technology-software product quality—Part 1: Quality model. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO/IS 9241-11 (1998) Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals—Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO/IS 13407 (1999) Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO/TR 18529 (2000) Ergonomics of human-system interaction-human-centred lifecycle process description. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J (1999) The unified software development process. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Killich S, Luczak H, Schlick C, Weissenbach M, Wiedenmaier S, Ziegler J (1999) Task modelling for cooperative work. Behav Inf Technol 18(5):325–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK, Hirschheim R (1991) Rationality concepts in information system development methodologies. Account Manag Inf Technol 1:157–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepreux S, Abed M, Kolski C (2003) A human-centred methodology applied to decision support system design and evaluation in a railway network context. Cognit Technol Work 5(4):248–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML (2004) Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change. J Inf Technol 19:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markensten E (2005) Mind the gap. A procurement approach to integrating user-centred design in contract development. Licentiate Thesis, KTH, Stockholm. http://www.diva-portal.org/diva/getDocument?urn_nbn_se_kth_diva-326-1_fulltext.pdf. Accessed January 2008

  • May E, Zimmer B (1996) The evolutionary development model for software. Hewlett-Packard J 47(4):39–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff IJ (1983) Stakeholders of the organisational mind. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff IJ, Linstone HA (1993) The unbounded mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (1983) Designing human systems for new technology: the ETHICS method. Manchester Business School, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford E (2000) A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requir Eng 5:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara JM (1994) Advanced human–system interface design review guidelines (NUREG/CR-5908), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson E (2004) What active users and designers contribute in the design process. Interact Comput 16(2):377–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W (1992) Learning from notes: organisational issues in groupware implementation. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW 92), pp 197–370

  • Orlikowski WJ, Baroudi J (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf Syst Res 2(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ould M. (1995) Business processes: modelling and analysis for re-engineering and improvement. John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel N (2000) Healthcare modelling through role activity diagrams for process-based information systems development. Requir Eng 5(2):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandom C, Macredie RD (2003) Analysing situated interaction hazards: an activity-based awareness approach. Cognit Technol Work 5(3):218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Temple Smith, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Storrs G (1997) Introduction to HCI in safety-critical systems. In: Redmill F, Rajan J (eds) Human factors in safety-critical systems, Butterworth-Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood J (2001) Negotiating the chasm in system development: some advice from ANT. In: Twelfth Australasian conference on information systems, Coffs Harbour, NSW. http://infotech.scu.edu.au/ACIS2001/Proceedings/PDFS/90.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2007

  • Walton RE (1990) Up and running: integrating information technology and the organization. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1978) Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. University of California Press, Berkeley

  • White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management—an empirical study. Int J Proj Manag 20(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler I, Buie E (1995) HCI challenges in government contracting. SIGCHI Bull 27(4):35–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Nicolas Marmaras for stimulating discussions and for his helpful suggestions and advice on preliminary versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechniou 9, 15780, Zografou, Greece

    Dimitris Nathanael & Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou

Authors
  1. Dimitris Nathanael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Nathanael.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nathanael, D., Vassilakopoulou, P. Integrating quality-in-use in the IS acquisition process: an activity perspective. Cogn Tech Work 11, 293–312 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0113-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0113-4

Keywords