Abstract
This paper presents an empirical study for extending the ecological safety model developed for individual activity (Amalberti in La conduite des systèmes à risques, PUF, 1996; Hoc and Amalberti in J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 1:22–55, 2007) to collective management. The study took place in a medical emergency center (SAMU) and focused on individual contribution to safety of collective management. The experiment aimed at extending the domain of validity of the conclusions of a previous study (Marc and Amalberti in Trav Hum 65:217–242, 2002) showing that individual intervention (as an actor and as an observer) in collective action was a matter of ecological safety. A “pseudo-simulation” was designed for confronting experienced PARMs and physicians of the SAMU with a series of “safety events” in the functioning of “their” emergency center. In the position of observers, participants were asked to comment on what they observed during a series of short periods of simulated activity and to assess situation mastery by the various actors observed. The results confirm that the model of ecological safety is directly relevant for collective management of “technical errors”: as observers, participants reacted to safety events depending on their potential consequences; not all “erroneous” actions oriented toward task performing were detected, and if detected they were not always identified; participants focused mainly on errors they observed which might have operational consequences on the global quality of safety management in the center. Concerning “non-technical errors” in collective work, participants were focusing on safety management by the physician as the responsible for the center safe functioning; they were less prone to identify safety events related to teamwork itself. These last results can be interpreted at the light of an extension of the ecological model of safety management for taking into account the teamwork-oriented dimension in collective work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Allwood CM (1984) Error detection processes in statistical problem. Cogn Sci 8:413–437
Amalberti R (1996) La conduite des systèmes à risques. PUF, Paris
Antolin-Glenn P, Rogalski J (2002) Expertise in distributed cooperation: a command post in operational management. In: Bagnara S, Pozzi S, Rizzo A, Wright P (eds) ECCE’11. Cognition, culture and design. CNR. Istituto di Scienze e technologie della cognizione, Catania, pp 143–150
Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds) (1997) Team performance assessment and measurement. Theory, methods and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Clarke DM (2005) Human redundancy in complex hazardous systems: a theoretical framework. Saf Sci 43(9):655–677
Cook RI, Woods DD (1994) Operating at the sharp end: the complexity of human error. In: Bogner MS (ed) Human error in medicine. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 235–311
Crichton M, Flin R, McGeorge P (2005) Decision making by on-scene commanders in nuclear emergencies. Cogn Technol Work 7:156–166
Doireau P, Wioland L, Amalberti R (1997) La détection des erreurs par des opérateurs extérieurs à l’action [Detection of errors by outside observers]. Trav Hum 60(2):131–153
Healey AN, Olsen S, Davis R, Vincent CA (2007) A method for measuring work interference in surgical teams. Cogn Technol Work DOI 10.1007/s10111-007-0088-6
Hoc JM (1998) How can we evaluate the quality of human-machine cooperation? In: Darses F, Zaraté R (eds) COOP’98 third international conference on the design of cooperative systems. INRIA, Le Chesnay, pp 121–130
Hoc JM, Amalberti R (2007) Cognitive control dynamics for reaching a satisficing performance in complex dynamic situations. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 1:22–55
Hoc JM, Carlier X (2002) Role of a common frame of reference in cognitive cooperation: sharing tasks between agents in air traffic control. Cogn Technol Work 4:37–47
Jentsch F, Barnet J, Bowers CA, Salas E (1999) Who is flying the plane anyway? What mishaps tell us about crew member role assignment and aircrew situation awareness? Hum Factors 41(1):1–14
Kirwan B (1992) Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Appl Ergon 23(5):299–317
Kirwan B (2001) Assessing human error in air traffic management systems design: methodological issues. Trav Hum 64(3):269–289
Klein G, Pliske R, Crandall B, Woods DD (2005) Problem detection. Cogn Technol Work 7:14–28
Marc J, Amalberti R (2002) Contribution individuelle au fonctionnement “sûr” du collectif: l’exemple de la régulation du SAMU [Individual contribution to group safety: the example of SAMU—the county medical telephone regulation of emergencies] Trav Hum 65:217–242
Navarro C, Marchand P (1994) Analyse de l’échange verbal en situation de dialogue fonctionnel: étude de cas. Trav Hum 57(4):313–330
Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society, a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27(2–3):183–214
Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Reason J (1997) Managing the risk of organizational accident. Aldershot, Ashgate
Rogalski J (1991) Distributed decision making in emergency management: using a method as a framework for analysing cooperative work and as a decision aid. In: Rasmussen J, Brehmer B, Leplat J (eds) Distributed decision making. Cognitive models for cooperative work. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp 303–318
Rogalski J (2005) Le travail collaboratif dans la réalisation des tâches collectives [Cooperative work in performing collective tasks]. In: Lautrey J, Richard JF (eds) L’intelligence. Hermès, Paris, pp 147–159
Rognin L (1996) Activités collectives et sûreté de fonctionnement [Collective activities and safe functioning]. Thèse de doctorat, Paul Sabatier Toulouse
Rognin L, Blanquard JL (1999) Impact of communication on systems dependability: human factors perspectives. In: Felici M, Kanoun K, Pasquini A (eds) Proceedings of Safecomp’99. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–124
Samurçay R, Rogalski J (1998) Exploitation didactique des situations de simulation [Didactical use of simulation situations]. Trav Hum 61(4):333–359
Sasou K, Reason J (1999) Team errors: definition and taxonomy. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 65:1–9
Valot C, Amalberti R (1992) Metaknowledge for time and reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 36(33):199–206
Wioland L, Doireau P (1995) Detection of human error by an outside observer: a case study in aviation. CSAPC’95, Espoo, pp 54–62
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N (2006) Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 139(2):140–149
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marc, J., Rogalski, J. Collective management in dynamic situations: the individual contribution. Cogn Tech Work 11, 313–327 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0115-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0115-2