Abstract
Modern manufacturing facilities are subject to organisational, technological, engineering and market constraints. The combination of these factors allows them to be described as sociotechnical enterprises. Control of these enterprises is distributed between human and automated agents who collaborate as part of a joint cognitive system. One of the challenges facing these industries is a need to evolve operations while maintaining stable performance. Cognitive Systems Engineering (CSE) provides a range of analytical frameworks that can be used to study the effects of change on sociotechnical systems. However, the scale of these enterprises and the range of decision-making styles involved make the selection of an appropriate framework difficult. A critical review of both positivist and hermeneutic approaches to cognitive systems research is provided. Following this a cognitive engineering process is outlined that uses a mixed model approach to describe system functionality, understand the implications of change and inform the design of cognitive artefacts that support system control. A case study examines the introduction of pervasive automation in the semiconductor manufacturing industry and is used to demonstrate the utility of this process.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bertin J (1983) Semiology of graphics. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco
Blandford A, Furniss D (2005) DiCoT: a methodology for applying distributed cognition to the design of teamworking systems. In: Gilroy S, Harrison M (eds) Proc. DSVIS 2005. LNCS, vol 3941. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 26–38
Burns CM, Hajdukiewicz JR (2004) Ecological interface design. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Card SK, Mackinlay J, Schneiderman B (1999) Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan-Kaufman, San Francisco
Christoffersen K, Woods DD (2002) How to make automated systems team players. Adv Human Perform Cogn Eng Res 2:1–12
Gamble PR, Blackwell J (2001) Knowledge management: a state of the art guide. Kogan Page, London
Goldratt E, Cox J (1986) Creative output books. The Goal, USA
Higgins PG (1998). Extending cognitive work analysis to manufacturing scheduling. In: Calder P, Thomas B (eds) Proceedings of Australian computer human interaction conference, OzCHI’98, November 30–December 4, Adelaide. IEEE, New York, pp 236–243
Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D (2000) Distributed cognition: towards a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction (TOCHI). ACM Press, New York
Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Massachusetts
Jamieson GA, Miller CA, Ho WH, Vicente KJ (2007) Integrating task- and work domain-based work analyses in ecological interface design: a process control case study. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 37(6):887–905
Kaptelinin V (1995) Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction Context and consciousness: activity theory and human–computer interaction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp 103–116
Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) (1993) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood
Lind M (1999) Plant modeling for human supervisory control. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 21(4/5):171–180
Marmaras N, Nathanael D (2005) Cognitive engineering practice: melting theory into reality. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6:109–127
Moore G (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8):114–117
Mouli C, Srinivasan K (2004) Intel automation and its role in process development and high volume manufacturing. In: Graf O (ed) Proceedings advanced semiconductor manufacturing conference, ASMC ’04, pp 313–320
Nardi, B.A (1995) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Norros L, Nuutinen M (2002) The concept of the core-task and the analysis of working practices. In: Borham N, Samurcay R, Fischer M (eds) Work process knowledge. Routledge, London, pp 25–33
Perry M (1999) The application of individually and socially distributed cognition in workplace studies: two peas in a pod? In: Bagnara S (ed) Proceedings of the European Conference on cognitive science—ECCS ‘99, 27th–30th October, Certosa di Pontignano, Siena, Italy, pp 87–92
Rasmussen J (1985) The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC.15(2):234–243
Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human–machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, New York
Rasmussen J (1983). Skills rules and knowledge: signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-13(3):257–266
Upton C, Doherty G (2005) Adapting the ADS for high volume manufacturing. INTERACT Rome, Italy. Springer, Heidelberg
Upton C, Doherty G (2007) Integrating ecological interface design with the visualisation reference model. In: Proceedings of 25th European conference on cognitive ergonomics, pp 175–178
Upton C, Doherty G (2006) Visual representation of complex information structures in high volume manufacturing. IFIP conference on human work interaction design, Madeira, Portugal, Springer, pp 45–63 1038–1041
Upton C, Doherty G (2008) Extending ecological interface design principles: a manufacturing case study. Int J Hum Comp Stud 66(4):271–286
Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive and healthy computer-based work. Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah
Vicente KJ, Rasmussen J (1992) Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE Trans 22(4):589–606
Wong WBL, Sallis PJ, O’Hare D (1998) The ecological approach to interface design: applying the abstraction hierarchy to intentional domains. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Australian conference on computer-human interaction OzCHI’98, IEEE Computer Society Press, Australia, pp 144–150
Woods DD (1998) Designs are hypotheses about how artifacts shape cognition and collaboration. Ergonomics 41(6):168–173
Woods DD, Sarter N (2000) Learning from Automation Surprises and Going Sour Accidents. In: Sarter N, Amalberti R (eds) Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 327–254
Woods DD (1985) Knowledge based development of graphic display systems. In: Proceedings of the human factors society 29th annual meeting, Human Factors Soc
Woods DD, Johannesen LJ, Cook RI, Sarter NB (1994) Behind human error: cognitive systems, computers and hindsight. CSERIAC, Columbus
Van Antwerp K (2004) Automation in a semiconductor Fab, Semiconductor International, December, 2004 [Online] Available http://www.semiconductor.net/article/CA483805.html [Accessed 20/07/2007]
Zhang J, Norman DA (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cogn Sci 18:87–122
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded through an Intel Ireland Research Scholarship. The authors would like to thank Donal Sheerin and the manufacturing operations team at Intel® Intel Ireland, Leixlip, Co. Kildare, for their valuable time and assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Upton, C., Doherty, G., Gleeson, F. et al. Designing decision support in an evolving sociotechnical enterprise. Cogn Tech Work 12, 13–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0124-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0124-1