Abstract
This paper describes how persuasive technologies have been introduced in the interface (HCI) of a production processes management system (PPMS) adopted into a high-risk chemical plant, making the operators’ tasks safer and less afflicted by human errors. The hypothesis that persuasive technologies can contribute to improve safety was empirically confirmed in a study carried out on a real PPMS. It has been observed that this PPMS implements a persuasion strategy called tunnelling, aimed at forcing the operators to strictly follow a step-by-step and start-to-end execution of the tasks. First, a survey was conducted on a sample of 13 operators in order to investigate the role played by the PPMS, comparing it with the “functional triad” proposed by Fogg (Persuasive technology. Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, 2002). Then, an analysis on production volumes and accidents revealed that the PPMS actually encourages safer behaviours and contributed to a reduction of the number of dangerous slips and lapses since its adoption.








Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
In 1982 the Council of the European Communities adopted the “Seveso I” Directive, which was subsequently replaced by “Seveso II” (“Emergenze Tecnologiche” 2005; “Rischio Industriale” 2005). Moreover, public concern over the impact that any industrial activity may have on the environment has prompted governments to adopt specific regulations in order to guarantee that some safety and environmental standards are maintained. For instance, Directive IPPC (issued in 1996 by the Council of the European Union) provides that all industrial plants must choose the best available techniques (BAT), so that they contribute to prevent and control pollution (“The IPPC Directive” 2005). The increasing need for transparency and safety has also induced some companies to join volunteer programs such as “Responsible Care” (“Federchimica” 2005; “Responsible Care” 2005).
Major accidents are defined as occurrences such as emissions, fires or explosions “resulting from uncontrolled developments in the course of an industrial activity, leading to a serious danger to man, immediate or delayed, inside or outside the establishment, and/or to the environment, and involving one or more dangerous substances” (Seveso Directive 82/501/EEC, article 1). Substances which may lead to major accidents are listed in the annexes of the directives together with their threshold quantities.
The production processes management system allows users to perform and coordinate the various steps which constitute a process and to alternate automatically-executed operations with actions where manual intervention is required. It offers information about both the current production process and the status of the plant and of the available resources.
Notice that, even though non-random samples are not statistically representative, they are often used in much psychology researches, as well as in usability testing, especially in early evaluation phases (Royce 1999).
References
Bainbridge L (1987) The ironies of automation. In: Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J (eds) New technology and human error. Wiley, London, pp 271–283
Cacciabue PC (2000) Gestione dell’errore umano in sistemi ad alta automazione. In: Mantovani G (ed) Ergonomia. Il Mulino, Bologna, pp 81–122
Cacciabue PC (2004) Guide to applying human factors methods. Human error and accident management in safety critical systems. Springer, London
Catino M (2002) Da Chernobyl a Linate. Incidenti tecnologici o errori organizzativi? Carocci, Rome
Elsubbaugh S, Fildes R, Rose MB (2004) Preparation for crisis management: a proposed model and empirical evidence. J Contingencies Crisis Manage 3(12):112–127
Emergenze Tecnologiche (2005) http://www.arpa.piemonte.it/index.php?module=ContentExpress&file=index&func=display&ceid=176&meid=221 (accessed Aug 2005)
Federchimica, XI Rapporto Responsible Care 2004 (2005) http://www2.federchimica.it/content/files/XI%20Rapporto%20Responsible%20Care%202004.pdf (accessed Aug 2005)
Fogg BJ (2002) Persuasive technology. Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco
Fogg BJ, Lee E, Marshall J (2002) Interactive technology and persuasion. In: Dillard JP, Pfau M (eds) The persuasion handbook: developments in theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 765–788
Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH (1953) Communication and Persuasion. Psychological studies on opinion change. Yale University Press, New Haven
James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J Appl Psychol 69:85–98
Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, New York
Norman DA (1990) The problem of automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not over-automation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B
Osgood CE, Suci G, Tannenbaum P (1957) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press
Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1981) Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. William C. Brown, Dubuque
Rasmussen J (1980) What can be learned from human error reports? In: Duncan K, Gruneberg Me, Wallis D (eds) Changes in working life. Wiley, London, pp 97–113
Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J (eds) (1987) New technology and human error. Wiley, London
Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Responsible Care (2005) http://www.responsiblecare.org/ (accessed Aug 2005)
Rischio Industriale (2005) http://www.arpa.piemonte.it/index.php?module=ContentExpress&file=index&func=display&ceid=535&meid=270 (accessed Aug 2005)
Skinner BF (1974) About behaviorism. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
The IPPC Directive (2005) http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ippc/index.htm (accessed Aug 2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vernero, F., Montanari, R. Persuasive technologies in the interface of a high-risk chemical plant production processes management system. Cogn Tech Work 12, 51–60 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-009-0128-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-009-0128-5