Skip to main content
Log in

Observing the observer: non-intrusive verbalisations using the Concurrent Observer Narrative Technique

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the application of, and a discussion about, a new method of information acquisition, the Concurrent Observer Narrative Technique (CONT), that requires an expert to narrate the work of experienced colleagues. The method is explored through a case study of instructors in a training simulation environment. The method involves multiple expert users of the system equally matched in experience; one or more of which perform the task at hand, namely running the training session, whilst another, not engaged in the training activity, provides verbal reports whilst observing task progression. All are situated in the work environment concurrently. The method is discussed in terms of the richness and detail of the data obtained from the reports and in terms of some advantages and disadvantages over other verbal reporting methods, specifically collegial verbalisation (Jansson et al. in Cogn Tech Work 8:41–49, 2006) and Elicitation By Critiquing (Miller et al. in Cogn Tech Work 8: 90–102, 2006). It is argued that the CONT provides a relatively easy, inexpensive, and non-intrusive method that can supply a wealth of information that does not require further interpretation and that the method is of particular applicability in domains where the subject matter expert is unable to provide concurrent verbalisations themselves and where the subject matter is too complex to be understood by a lay person.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bainbridge L (1979) Verbal reports as evidence of the process operator’s knowledge. Int J Man Mach Stud 11:411–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartl C, Dörner D (1998) Speechless when thinking: about the role of speech for problem solving. Sprache und Kognition 17:224–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisantz AM, Drury CG (2005) Applications of archival and observational data. In: Wilson JR, Corlett N (eds) Evaluation of human work. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 61–82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom BS (1976) Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büttner OB, Silberer G (2007) Research spoilt the shopping trip: comparing the reactivity of thinking aloud and video-cued thought protocols at the point of purchase. In: Flexible marketing in an unpredictable world, Proceedings of the 36th EMAC Conference, 22–25 May, Reykjavik, Iceland

  • Cooke NJ (1999) Knowledge elicitation. In: Durso F, Nickerson RS, Schvaneveldt RW, Dumais ST, Lindsay DS, Chi MTH (eds) Handbook of applied cognition. New York, Wiley, pp 479–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson J, McLennan J, Omodei MM (2000) Effects of concurrent verbalisation on a time-critical, dynamic decision-making task. J Gen Psychol 127:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duval S, Wicklund RA (1972) A theory of objective self-awareness. Academic Press, New York

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1980) Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev 87:215–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. The MIT Press, Cambridge Revised ed

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandsson M, Jansson A (2007) Collegial verbalisation–a case study on a new method of information acquisition. Behav Inf Technol 26:535–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington-Darby T, Wilson JR (2009) Understanding social interactions in a complex world: a video ethnography. Cogn Tech Work 11:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington-Darby T, Wilson JR, Norris BJ, Clarke T (2006) A naturalistic study of railway controllers. Ergonomics 49:1370–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons FX (1983) Self-attention and self-report: the “veridicality” hypothesis. J Pers 51:517–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M, Atkinson P (1995) Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson A, Olsson E, Erlandsson M (2006) Bridging the gap between analysis and design: Improving existing driver interfaces with tools from the framework of cognitive work analysis. Cogn Tech Work 8:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DP, Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH (2009) Cognitive work analysis: coping with complexity. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham

  • Kirwan B, Ainsworth LK (1992) A guide to task analysis. Taylor Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Calderwood R, MacGregor D (1983) Critical decision method for knowledge elicitation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 19:462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuusela H, Paul P (2000) A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am J Psychol 113:387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax H, Casey N (1998) Recording social life: reflexivity and video methodology. Sociological Research Online, 3, retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/lomax/lomax_doc.html on the 21st of April 2010

  • McNeese MD (2004) How video informs cognitive systems engineering: making experience count. Cogn Tech Work 6:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JE, Patterson ES, Woods DD (2006) Elicitation by critiquing as a cognitive task analysis methodology. Cogn Tech Work 8:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omodei MM, McLennan JP (1994) Complex decision making in natural settings: using a head mounted video camera to study competitive orienteering. Percept Mot Skills 79:1411–1425

    Google Scholar 

  • Omodei MM, McLennan J, Whitford P (1998) Improving decision making in complex natural settings: using a head-mounted video camera to improve performance of competitive orienteers. Int J Sport Psychol 29:115–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Omodei MM, McLennan J, Wearing AJ (2002) Head-mounted video and cued recall: a methodology for detecting, understanding and minimising error in the control of complex Systems. In: Johnson CW (ed) Proceedings of the 21st European Annual Conference of Human Decision Making and Control, GIST technical report G2002.1, Department of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, pp 72–80

  • Omodei MM, McLennan JP, Wearing AJ (2004) How expertise is applied in real-world dynamic environments: head mounted video and cued recall as a methodology for studying routines of decision making. In: Betsch T, Haberstroh S (eds) The routines of decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, pp 271–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Øvergård KI, Bjørkli CA, Røed BK, Hoff T (2010) Control strategies used by experienced marine navigators: observation of verbal conversations during navigation training. Cogn Tech Work. doi: 10.1007/s10111-009-0132-9

  • Patterson KA, McDonlad N, Engen OA (2010) Rethinking the role of social theory in socio-technical analysis: a critical realist approach to aircraft maintenance. Cogn Tech Work. doi: 10.1007/s10111-009-0133-8

  • Rasmussen J, Pejtersen A, Goodstein LP (1994) Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New York

  • Russo JE, Johnson EJ, Stephens D (1989) The validity of verbal protocols. Mem Cognit 17:759–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagull FJ, Xiao Y (2001) Using eye-tracking video data to augment knowledge elicitation in cognitive task analysis. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting. HFES, Minneapolis

  • Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH, Baber C, Jenkins DP (2005) Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann WB, Griffin JJ, Predmore SC, Gaines B (1987) The cognitive-affective crossfire: when self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Haak MJ, de Jong MDT, Schellens JP (2003) Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behav Inf Technol 22:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gog T, Kester L, Nievelstein F, Geisbers B, Paas F (2009) Uncovering cognitive processes: different techniques that contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Comput Hum Behav 25:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

  • Walker GH, Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Jenkins DP (2009) Command and control: the sociotechnical perspective. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Seagull FJ, Mackenzie CF, Klein K (2004) Adaptive leadership in trauma resuscitation teams: a grounded theory approach to video analysis. Cogn Tech Work 6:158–164

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research from the Human Factors Integration Defence Technology Centre was part-funded by the Human Sciences Domain of the UK Ministry of Defence Scientific Research Programme. Any views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Ministry of Defence or any other UK government department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rich C. McIlroy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIlroy, R.C., Stanton, N.A. Observing the observer: non-intrusive verbalisations using the Concurrent Observer Narrative Technique. Cogn Tech Work 13, 135–149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0160-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0160-5

Keywords