Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Incorporating multiple patterns of activity into the design of cognitive work support systems

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of support systems for cognitive work needs to account for the different patterns of activity resulting from changes in context. The contextual control modes from Hollnagel’s model of control are presented as a suitable framework to describe these patterns and to identify the implications for design of support systems. The design and evaluation of a prototype support system for airline operations is used as a case study in supporting multiple cognitive control modes. The evaluation of the prototype with experts illustrated clear and distinguishable changes in the patterns of activity in different contextual control modes. Notably, different designs were demonstrated to support particular contextual control modes and to disrupt cognitive activity in contextual control modes which they were not intended to support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. The amount of time allowable to resolve the problem, which may be assessed relative to the time required to resolve the problem.

References

  • Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual design. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings C, Woods DD (1994) Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends. Chapter concerns about adaptive automation in aviation systems, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, pp 24–29

  • Brehmer B (1992) Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. Acta Psychol 81(3):211–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M, Smith B (2004) Impact of operations research on the evolution of the airline industry. J Aircraft 41(1):62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J-P, Malconian T, Rabbani F (2007) MEANS–the MIT extensible air network simulation. Simulation 83(4):385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigh KM (2006), Contextual inquiry of a 100 aircraft regional airline systems operation center. Technical Report GTCEC2006-0001, Georgia Tech Cognitive Engineering Center

  • Feigh KM (2007a), Contextual inquiry of a 50 aircraft regional airline systems operation center. Technical Report GTCEC2007-0002, Georgia Tech Cognitive Engineering Center

  • Feigh KM (2007b), Contextual inquiry of a major us airline systems operation center. Technical Report GTCEC2007-0001, Georgia Tech Cognitive Engineering Center

  • Feigh KM (2008) Design of cognitive work support systems for airline operations. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Feigh KM, Pritchett AR (2005) Airline operations managers: an introduction to the third leg of the national air transportation system. In 6th USA/Europe ATM R&D seminar. Baltimore, Maryland

  • Feigh KM, Pritchett AR (2010) Modeling work for cognitive work support system design in operational control centers. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 4(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigh KM, Pritchett AR, Jacko JA, Denq T (2005) Decision making during an airline rescheduling task: a contextual control model description. In 13th international symposium on aviation psychology. ISAP, Oklahoma City

  • Feigh KM, Pritchett AR, Jacko JA, Denq T (2007) Contextual control modes during an airline rescheduling task. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 1(2):169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch D, Clemen RT (1994) Beyond expected utility: rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychol Bull 116(1):46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond KR (2000) Judgments under stress. Chapter: the cognitive continuum theory of judgment. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Hilburn B, Flynn G (2004) Human performance, situation awareness and automation: current research and trends (HPSAAII), vol 1 and 2. Chapter toward a non-linear approach to modeling air traffic complexity. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp 207–213

  • Hoffman RR, Militello LG (2008) Perspectives on cognitive task analysis. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (1993) Human reliability analysis: context and control. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (1998) Co-operative process management. Chapter: context, cognition and control. Taylor & Francis Ltd., London

  • Jobidon ME, Rousseau R, Breton R (2004) Time in the control of a dynamic environment. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 48th annual meeting. HFES, New Orleans, pp 557–561

  • Johnson KE, Kuchar JK, Oman CM (2002) Experimental study of automation to support time-critical replanning decisions. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 46th annual meeting. HFES, Baltimore, p 5

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerstholt JH (1996) The effect of information costs on strategy selection in dynamic tasks. Acta Psychol 94:273–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirlik A (1993) Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: why an “aid” can (and should) go unused. Hum Factors 35(2):221–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (1997) Decision making under stress. Chapter: the current status of the naturalistic decision making framework. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot

  • Klein G (1998) Sources of power: how people make decisions. MIT Press, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA (2005) The strengths and limitations of teams for detecting problems. Cogn Tech Work 8:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maule JA (1997) Decision making under stress. Chapter strategies for adapting to time pressure. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot

  • Niwa Y, Hollnagel E (2001) Enhancing operator control by adaptive alarm presentation. Int J Cogn Ergon 5(3):367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu J, Connolly T (1993) Decision making in action: models and methods. Chapter: the reinvention of decision making. Ablex, Norwood

  • Orasanu J, Salas E (1993) Decision making in action: models and methods. Chapter team decision making in complex environments. Ablex, Norwood, NJ

  • Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The adaptive decision maker. Chapter contingencies in decision making. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Pujet N, Feron E (2000) Modeling an airline operations control center. Air Traffic Control Q 7(4):127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1983) The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-15(2):234–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton NA, Ashleigh MJ, Roberts AD, Xu F (2001) Testing Hollnagel’s contextual control model: assessing team behavior in a human supervisory control task. Int J Cogn Ergon 5(2):111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd PA, Benbasat I (1992) The use of information in decision making: an experimental investigation of the impact of computer based decision aids. MIS Q 16(3):373–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd PA, Benbasat I (1994) The influence of decision aids on choice strategies under conditions of high cognitive load. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(4):537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Westrenen F (2010) Cognitive work analysis and the design of user interfaces. Cogn Technol Work 12(4):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods D, Branlat M (2010) Hollnagel’s test: being ‘in control’ of highly interdependent multi-layered networked systems. Cogn Tech Work 12:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georgia Institute of Technology, 270 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

    Karen M. Feigh

Authors
  1. Karen M. Feigh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen M. Feigh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feigh, K.M. Incorporating multiple patterns of activity into the design of cognitive work support systems. Cogn Tech Work 13, 259–279 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0165-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0165-0

Keywords