Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Resilience is not control: healthcare, crisis management, and ICT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Like other high hazard sectors, successful crisis response relies on a well-founded understanding of the work domain and the manner in which operators perceive and deal with obstacles to achieving goals. That understanding is essential to the development of information and communications technology (ICT) that are intended to support operator performance. While crises are uncommon in other high hazard sectors such as nuclear power generation and aviation, acute and ambulatory healthcare work encounters life-and-death crises daily. This makes healthcare a useful living laboratory to develop ICT in order to manage crises. This paper shows how healthcare organizations that continually deal with complex, uncertain, high-tempo operations can serve as a model to develop ICT that supports crisis management. We illustrate the results of using these methods through an example of cognitive systems engineering research that identifies ambulatory care risks to patients. We then describe multiple methods that can be used together to efficiently study complex, high hazard work settings. We conclude with an example of how it can support the development of a cognitive aid for diabetic care to support work in that setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Ash J, Berg M, Coiera E (2004) Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11(2):104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant W, Greenfield JR, Chisholm DJ, Campbell LV (2006) Diabetes guidelines: Easier to preach than to practise? Med J Aust 185(6):301–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer JA (2004) A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:1218–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltovich PJ, Ford KM, Hoffman RR (eds) (1997) Expertise in context: human and machine. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu L, Salvendy G, Turley L (1998) Who finds what in usability evaluation. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 42nd annual meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica pp 1341–1345

  • Guerci B, Drouin P, Grangé V, Bougnères P, Fontaine P, Kerlan V, Passa P, Thivolet CH, Vialettes B, Charbonnel B (2003) Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Auto-Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study. Diabetes Metab 29(6):587–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann R, Crandall B, Shadbolt N (1998) Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: a case study in cognitive task analysis methodology. Hum Factors 40(2):254–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Nemeth C, Dekker S (eds) (2008) Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure. Resilience engineering perspectives. 1. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (2002) Cognitive artifacts. Retrieved on 7 July 2002 from the MIT COGNET Web Site: http://cognet.mit.edu/MITECS/Entry/hutchins

  • Klein H (2008) Adaptation at the edge: when the system is complex, the stakes high, and the operator novice. In: Nemeth C, Symposium on adaptation to change and uncertainty. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting, New York

  • Klein G, Calderwood R, MacGregor D (1989) Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cybern 19(3):462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Woods DD, Bradshaw JM, Hoffman RR, Feltovich PJ (2004) Ten challenges for making automation a “team player” in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Computer 6:91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Konen JC, Curtis LG, Summerson JH (1996) Symptoms and complications of adult diabetic patients in a family practice. Arch Fam Med 5(3):135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morisky DE, Kominski GF, Afifi AA, and Kotlerman JB (2008) The Effects of a disease management program on self-reported health behaviors and health outcomes: evidence From the “Florida: a healthy state (FAHS)” medicaid program. Health Educ Behav Online

  • Nemeth C (2003) The master schedule: how cognitive artifacts affect distributed cognition in acute care. Dissertation Abstracts International 64/08, 3990, (UMI No. AAT 3101124)

  • Nemeth C (2004) Human factors methods for design. Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth C (2007) Healthcare groups at work: Further lessons from research into large scale coordination. In: Nemeth C (ed) Second special issue on large scale coordination. Cogn Technol Work 9(3):127–130

  • Nemeth C, Klein G (2011) The naturalistic decision making perspective. In: Cochran JJ (ed). Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. John Wiley and Sons, New York

  • Nemeth C, Wears R (2008) An agenda for healthcare team communication research. In: Nemeth C (ed) Improving healthcare team communication: building on lessons from aviation and aerospace. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 245–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth C, Cook R, Woods D (2004) The messy details: insights from technical work in healthcare. In: Nemeth C, Cook R, Woods D (eds). Special issue on studies in healthcare technical work. IEEE Trans syst Man and Cybern-part A. 34:6 pp 689–992

  • Nemeth C, O’Connor M, Klock PA, and Cook RI (2006) Discovering healthcare cognition: the use of cognitive artifacts to reveal cognitive work. In: Lipshitz R (ed) Special issue on naturalistic decision making. Organ Stud 27(7):1011–1035

  • Nemeth C, Walter J, Wears R, Cook RI (2008a) The path to resilience in ambulatory care. Agency for healthcare research and quality annual meeting, Bethesda, MD

  • Nemeth C, Wears R, Woods D, Hollnagel E, and Cook R (2008b) Minding the gaps: creating resilience in healthcare. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML (eds) Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches. 3. Performance and tools. AHRQ publication no. 08-0034-3. Rockville, MD: agency for healthcare research and quality. pp 259–271

  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J, Mack RL (1994) Usability inspection methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris S, Lau J, Smith S, Schmid C, Engelgau M (2002) Self-management education for adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 25(7):1159–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson E, Cook R, Woods D, Render M Gaps and resilience. In: Bogner M (ed) Human error in medicine. 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (in press)

  • Patton M (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry S, Wears R (2009) Notes from the underground. In: Nemeth C, Hollnagel E, Dekker S (eds) Resilience engineering perspectives, volume 2: preparation and restoration. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter S, Roth E, Woods D, Elm C (1998) Bootstrapping multiple converging cognitive analysis techniques for system design. In: Van Schraagen JM, Chipman F, Schalin V (eds) Cogntive task analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J, Pjetersen AM, Goodstein LP (1994) Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid PR, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G (eds) (2005) Building a better delivery system: a new engineering/health care partnership. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin J (1994) Handbook of usability testing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson LK, Hickson JCL, Burns CM (2003) A work domain analysis for diabetes management. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Denver. pp 1516–1520

  • Vicente K (2000) Work domain analysis and task analysis: a difference that matters. In: Schragen JM, Chipman SF, Shalin VL (eds) Cognitive task analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Wears R, Perry S, Anders S, Woods D (2008) Resilience in the emergency department. In: Hollnagel E, Nemeth C, Dekker S (eds) Resilience engineering perspectives 1. Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (2001) Tool retention and fatalities in wildland fire settings: conceptualizing the naturalistic. In: Salas, E, Klein G (eds) Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 321–336

  • Weyhreter H, Holl RW, Beerstecher AM, Borsch M (2008) Additional treatment supporting standard care for children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus Type I—indication, acceptance and outcome: results from a multi-centre observational study. Klin Padiatr 220(2):70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD (2003) Process tracing methods for the study of cognition outside the experimental psychology laboratory. In: Klein G, Calderwood R, Orasanu J (eds) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex, Norwood, pp 228–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods D, Cook RI (2002) Nine steps to move forward from error. Cogn Technol Work 4(2):137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge insightful contributions by James Walter, MD during the research that formed the basis for this manuscript. Dr. Nemeth’s research during his tenure at the University of Chicago was made possible by generous support of the University of Chicago’s Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, and a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klein Associates Division, Applied Research Associates, 1750 Commerce Center Drive North, Fairborn, OH, 45324, USA

    Christopher Nemeth

  2. The University of Florida, 655 W. 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA

    Robert L. Wears

  3. The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

    Sachin Patel, Greg Rosen & Richard Cook

Authors
  1. Christopher Nemeth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert L. Wears
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sachin Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Greg Rosen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard Cook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Nemeth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nemeth, C., Wears, R.L., Patel, S. et al. Resilience is not control: healthcare, crisis management, and ICT. Cogn Tech Work 13, 189–202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0174-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0174-7

Keywords