Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A context-sensitive model of driving behaviour and its implications for in-vehicle safety systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 03 January 2013

Abstract

The different models of driver behaviour can be categorized as ‘Descriptive’ models that focus on what the driver does and ‘Functional’ models that focus on why the driver behaves the way he does and from that to predict drivers’ performance in different situations: demanding situations that elicit peak performance capabilities and routine situations that elicit typical behaviour. The optimal approach might be a hybrid that extracts the most useful features of each. Recently, a variety of driver support and information management systems have been designed and implemented to improve safety and performance. To predict the impact of these systems on driver behaviour, we need predictive models of driver–vehicle–environment interactions. The aim of the European ITERATE project is to develop and validate a unified driver–vehicle–environment (DVE) model. A critical review of existing models led to the identification of the most relevant parameters and variables that need to be included in such models. The selected driver characteristics (and variables used to measure them) are culture (country), attitudes/personality (sensation seeking), experience (hazard perception skills), driver state (fatigue), and task demand (workload). The proposed model includes selected environmental parameters that are simulated in the different test phases, such as road, traffic and visibility. The model will consider driving behaviour and performance from the point of view of how drivers perceive and attend to environmental situations, make choices, and respond to those situations. Performance will be measured in terms of errors and reaction times. Though this paper focuses on cars, the ITERATE project covers trains and ships as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett J (1994) Sensation seeking: a new conceptualization and a new scale. Pers Individ Differ 16:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayvaşık HB, Nurhan E, Sümer N (2007) Traffic violations and errors: the effects of sensation seeking and attention. In: Proceedings of the third international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design

  • Bener A, Özkan T, Lajunen T (2008) The driver behaviour questionnaire in Arab Gulf countries: Qatar and United Arab Emirates. Accid Anal Prev 40:1411–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell M, Harty D (2004) The multibody systems approach to vehicle dynamics. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowsky A, Shinar D, Oron-Gilad T (2007) Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving. In: Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design

  • Cacciabue PC, Carsten O (2010) A simple model of driver behaviour to sustain design and safety assessment of automated systems in automotive environments. Appl Ergonomics 41:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacciabue PC, Saad F (2008) Behavioural adaptations to driver support systems: a modelling and road safety perspective. Cogn Technol Work 10(1):31–39 (Dec 2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campagne A, Pebayle T, Muzet A (2004) Correlation between driving errors and vigilance level: influence of the driver’s age. Physiol Behav 80:515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsten O (2009) Behavioural adaptation: friend or foe? In: de Waard D, Godthelp J, Kooi FL, Brookhuis KA (eds) Human factors, security and safety. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, the Netherlands, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung E, Ohtani O, Warita H, Kuwahara M, Morita H (2005) Effect of rain on travel demand and traffic accidents. 8th IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Vienna, Austria

  • Chung E, Ohtani O, Warita H, Kuwahara M, Morita H (2006) Does weather affect highway capacity? Presented at the 5th international symposium on highway capacity and quality of service, Yakoma, Japan

  • Dahlen ER, White RP (2006) The big five factors, sensation seeking and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Pers Individ Differ 41:903–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waard D, Kruizinga A, Brookhuis KA (2008) The consequences of an increase in heavy goods vehicles for passenger car drivers’ mental workload and behaviour: a simulator study accident. Anal Prev 40(2):818–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond PA, Hancock PA (2001) Active and passive fatigue states. In: Hancock PA, Desmond PA (eds) Stress, workload, and fatigue. LEA Publishers, London, pp 455–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrichard O, Denarie V (2005) Sensation seeking and negative affectivity as predictors of risky behaviors: a distinction between occasional versus frequent risk-taking. Addict Behav 30:1449–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingus TA, Klauer SG, Neale VL, Peterson A, Lee SE, Sudweeks J, Perez MA, Hankey J, Ramsey D, Gupta S, Bucher C, Doerzaph ZR, Jarmeland J, Knipling RR (2006) The 100-car naturalistic driving study, phase II—results of the 100-car field experiment, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC

  • Drummond AE (2000) Paradigm lost! paradigm gained? An Australian’s perspective on the novice driver problem. In: Proceedings of the novice driver conference, 1st–2nd June 2000, Bristol, available at www.dft.gov.uk

  • Edwards JB (1999) Speed adjustment of motorway commuter traffic to incident weather. Trans Res Part F 2:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvik R, Vaa T (eds) (2004) The handbook of road safety measures. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • European Road Safety Observatory (2006) Fatigue. Retrieved July 2009 from http://www.erso.eu

  • Factor R, Mahalel D, Yair G (2007) The social accident: a theoretical model and a research agenda for studying the influence of social and cultural characteristics on motor vehicle accidents. Accid Anal Prev 39:914–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fastenmeier W, Gstalter H (2007) Driving task analysis as a tool in traffic safety research and practice. Saf Sci 45:952–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher L, Petersson L, Zelinsky A (2005) Road scene monotony detection in a fatigue management driver assistance system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV2005), Las Vegas USA, June 2005

  • Fuller R (2000) The task-capability interface model of the driving process. Recherche Transports S‘curit’ 66:47–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller R (2005) Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accid Anal Prev 37:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao X, Wang Z, Yang F, Wang Y, Guo Y, Zhang K (2007) The effect of traffic on situation awareness and mental workload: simulator-based study. In: Don Harris (ed) Proceedings of the 7th international conference on engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (EPCE’07), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 288–296

  • Hogema JH, Veltman HA, Van’t Hof A (2005) Effects of motorway lighting on workload and driving behaviour. In: Underwood G (ed) Traffic transport psychology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 355–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Horswill MS, McKenna FP (2004) Drivers’ hazard perception ability: Situation awareness on the road. In: Banbury S, Tremblay S (eds) A cognitive approach to situation awareness: theory and application. Ashgate, Aldershot, England, pp 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Horswill M, Marrigton S, McCullough C, Wood J, Pachana N, McWilliam J, Raikos M (2008) The hazard perception ability of older drivers. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 63B(4):P212–P218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyinam AF, Iyinam S, Ergun M (1997) Analysis of relationship between highway safety and road geometric design elements: Turkish case

  • Jonah BA (1997) Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Accid Anal Prev 29:651–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonah BA, Thiessen R, Au-Yeung E (2001) Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. Accid Anal Prev 33:679–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrer K, Vohringer-Kuhnt T, Baumgarten T, Briest S (2004) The role of individual differences in driver fatigue prediction. In: Third international conference on traffic and transportation psychology, Nottingham, 2004

  • Keay K, Simmonds I (2005) The association of rainfall and other weather variables with road traffic volume in Melbourne, Australia. Accid Anal Prev 37:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauer SG, Dingus TA, Neale VL, Sudweeks JD, Ramsey DJ (2006) The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data DOT HS 810 594

  • Klauer SG, Olsen EC, Simons-Morton BG, Dingus TA, Ramsey DJ, Ouimet MC (2008) Detection of road hazards by novice teen and experienced adult drivers. Transp Res Rec 2078:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JD (2008) Fifty years of driving safety research. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergonomics Soc 50(3):521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner ND, Laneras RE, McGee HW, Taori S, Alexander G (2003) Additional investigations on driver information overload NCHRP report 488, TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC

  • Lindgren A, Broström R, Chen A, Bengtsson P (2007) Driver attitudes towards advanced driver assistance systems: cultural differences and similarities. In: de Waard D, Hockey GRJ, Nickel P, Brookhuis KA (eds) Human factors issues in complex system performance. Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, the Netherlands, pp 205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wu T (2009) Fatigued driver’s driving behavior and cognitive task performance: effects of road environments and road environment changes. Saf Sci 47(8):1083–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lund IO, Rundmo T (2009) Cross-cultural comparisons of traffic safety, risk perception, attitudes and behaviour. Saf Sci 47:547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lützhöft M, Thorslund B, Kircher A, Gillberg M (2007) Fatigue at sea: a field study in Swedish shipping R586A (No. VTI rapport 586A) VTI, Linköping

  • Machin MA, Sankey KS (2006) Factors influencing young drivers’ risk perceptions and speeding behaviour. In: 2006 Australasian road safety research, policing and education conference, 25–27 Oct 2006, Gold Coast, Qld

  • Machin MA, Sankey KS (2008) Relationships between young drivers’ personality characteristics, risk perceptions and driving behaviour. Accid Anal Prev 40(2):541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makishita H, Matsunaga K (2008) Differences of drivers’ reaction times according to age and mental workload. Accid Anal Prev 40:567–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis J, Hess CW (2009) Sleepiness and vigilance tests. Swiss Med Wkly 139(15–16):214–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G (2002) Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. Theor Issues Ergonomic Sci 3(2):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G, Desmond PA (1998) Personality and multiple dimensions of task-induced fatigue: a study of simulated driving. Pers Individ Differ 25:443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May JF, Baldwin CL (2009) Driver fatigue: the importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Trans Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 12(3):218–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maycock G, Lockwood C, Lester J (1991) The accident liability of car drivers, TRL research report 315, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK

  • McKenna FP (2006) Changing driver behaviour? Paper presented at the 71st road safety congress, royal society for the prevention of accidents, Blackpool, UK

  • McKenna FP, Crick JL (1997) Developments in hazard perception (contractor report 313). Department of Transport, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna FP, Farrand P (1999) The role of automaticity in driving. In: Grayson GB (ed) Behavioural research in road safety IX, Report No. PA3524/99, Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), Crowthorne, UK

  • Mourant RR, Ge Z (1997) Measuring attentional demand in a virtual environments driving simulator. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 41st annual meeting. HFES, Santa Monica, CA, pp 1268–1272

  • NHTSA (2008) National motor vehicle crash causation survey report to congress DOT HS 811 059

  • Nordfjarn T, Rundmo T (2009) Perceptions of traffic risk in an industrialised and a developing country. Transp Res Part F 12:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (1981) Categorization of action slips. Psychol Rev 88:1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006) Young drivers: the road to safety, European conference of ministers of transportation

  • Oron-Gilad T, Ronen A (2007) Road characteristics and driver fatigue: a simulated study. Transp Inj Prev 8:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östlund J, Nilsson L, Carsten O, Merat N, Jamson H, Jamson S, Mouta S, Carvalhais J, Santos J, Anttila V, Sandberg H, Luoma J, de Waard D, Brookhuis K, Johansson E, Engström J, Victor T, Harbluk J, Janssen W, Brouwer R (2004) Deliverable 2—HMI and safety-related driver performance (No. GRD1/2000/25361 S12.319626): Human machine interface and the safety of traffic in Europe (HASTE) project

  • Özkan T (2006) The regional differences between countries in traffic safety: a cross-cultural study and Turkish Case, Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki

  • Özkan T, Lajunen T, Chliaoutakis JE, Parker D, Summala H (2006a) Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: a comparison of six countries. Transp Res Part F 9:227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özkan T, Lajunen T, Chliaoutakis JE, Parker D, Summala H (2006b) Cross-cultural differences in driving skills: a comparison of six countries. Accid Anal Prev 38:1011–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten CJD, Kircher A, O¨stlund J, Nilsson L, Svenson O (2006) Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments. Accid Anal Prev 38:887–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauzié A, Manzano J (2007) Evaluation of driver mental workload facing new in-vehicle information and communication technology. Enhanced safety in vehicle conference, Lyon, France

  • Pauzié A, Manzano J, Dapzol N (2007) Driver’s behavior and workload assessment for new in-vehicle technologies design. In: 4th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design, Stevenson, Washington, USA, pp 572–580, 9–12 July 2007

  • Peltola H, Kulmala R (2000) Weather-related intelligent speed adaptation: experience from a simulator. Report, Technical Research Centre, Finland

  • Quimby AR, Watts GR (1981) Human factors and driving performance (laboratory report 1004). Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Quimby AR, Maycock G, Carter ID, Dixon R, Wall JG (1986) Perceptual abilities of accident involved drivers (research report 27). Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney TA (1994) Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. Accid Anal Prev 26(6):733–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney TA, Sussman ED, Tijerina L, Tasca L, Smiley A, Rockwell TH, Koppa R (2000) Vehicle user characteristics: research needs in the new millennium, TRB millennium report, Committee A3B02, committee on vehicle user characteristics, transportation research board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Jan 2000, p 8

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. Elsevier Science Inc

  • Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regan M, Stephan K, Mitsopoulos E, Young K, Triggs T, Tomasevic N (2005) The effect on driver workload, attitudes and acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems: selected final results from the TAC SafeCar project; Monash University Accident Research Centre; Monash University, Australia

  • Rimmo P, Aberg L (1999) On the distinction between violations and errors: sensation seeking associations. Trans Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2(3):151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA) (2001) Driver fatigue and road accidents: a literature review and position paper royal society for the prevention of accidents

  • Rudin-Brown CM, Noy YI (2002) Investigation of behavioural adaptation to lane departure warning systems. Transp Res Rec 1803:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudin-Brown CM, Noy I (2003) Investigation of behavioral adaptation to lane departure warning. Transp Res Rec 1803:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudin-Brown CM, Parker HA (2004) Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transp Res Part F 7:59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad F (2006) Some critical issues when studying behavioural adaptations to new driver support systems. Cogn Technol Work 8(3):175–181(7)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabey BE, Staughton GC (1975) Interacting roles of road environment, vehicle and road user in accidents. Paper presented at the 5th international conference on the international association for accident and traffic medicine, London

  • Sagberg F, Bjørnskau T (2006) Hazard perception & driving experience among novice drivers. Accid Anal Prev 38(2):407–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SARTRE 3 (2004) European drivers and road risk part 1

  • Saxby DJ (2007) Active and passive fatigue in simulated driving. Paper presented at the 99th annual meeting of the Southern society for philosophy and psychology, Atlanta, GA

  • Saxby DJ, Matthews G, Hitchcock T (2007) Fatigue states are multidimensional: evidence from studies of simulated driving. In: Proceedings of the driving simulation conference—North America 2007. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

  • Schiessl C (2008) Subjective strain estimation depending on driving manoeuvres and traffic situation. IET Intell Transp Syst 2(4):258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwebel DC, Severson J, Ball KK, Rizzo M (2006) Individual difference factors in risky driving: the roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking. Accid Anal Prev 38:801–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwebel DC, Ball KK, Severson J, Barton BK, Rizzo M, Viamonte SM (2007) Individual difference factors in risky driving among older adults. J Saf Res 38(5):501–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segel L (1956) Theoretical prediction and response of the automobile to steering control. In: Research in automobile stability and control in tire performance, proceedings of the automobile division of the institution of mechanical engineers, 1956–57, No. 7, pp 26–46

  • Setti JR, Rakha H, El-Shawarby I (2006) Analysis of brake perception-reaction times on high-speed signalized intersection approaches. In: Proceedings of the IEEE ITSC 2006 intelligent transportation systems conference Toronto, Canada, September 17–20, 2006

  • Shinar D (1978) Psychology on the road: the human factor in traffic safety. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinar D (2007) Traffic safety and human behavior oxford. Elsevier, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivak M, Soler J, Trankle U (1989a) Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-taking. Accid Anal Prev 21(4):363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivak M, soler J, Trankle U, Spagnhol JM (1989b) Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-perception. Accid Anal Prev 21(4):355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Horswill M, Brooke C, Wetton M (2009a) Hazard perception in novice and experienced drivers: the effects of sleepiness. Accid Anal Prev 41:729–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Horswill M, Chambers B, Wetton M (2009b) Sleepiness and hazard perception while driving report no. RSRG 2009-001

  • Stanton NA, Salmon PM (2009) Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf Sci 47:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahan C, Watson B, Lennonb A (2008) Can organisational safety climate and occupational stress predict work-related driver fatigue? Transp Res Part F 11:418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sümer N (2007) Comparison of self-reported and computer-based hazard perception skills among novice and experienced drivers. In: Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design

  • Sümer N, Lajunen T, Özkan T (2005) Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement traffic and transport psychology: theory and application. In: proceedings of the ICTTP 2004 by Geoffrey Underwood, Published by Elsevier, pp 215–227

  • Sümer N, Ünal AB, Birdal A (2007) Assessment of hazard perception latencies using real life and animated traffic hazards: comparison of novice and experienced drivers. In: Proceedings of the fourth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design

  • Summala H (2000) Brake reaction times and driver behavior analysis. Trans Human Factors 2(3):217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tango F, Minin L, Tesauri F, Montanari R (2010) Field tests and machine learning approaches for refining algorithms and correlations of driver’s model parameters. Appl Ergonomics 41:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiffault P, Bergeron J (2003) Fatigue and individual differences in monotonous simulated driving. Pers Individ Differ 34:159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treat JR, Tumbas NS, McDonald ST, Shinar D, Hume RD, Mayer RE, Stanisfer RL, Castellan NJ (1977) Tri-level study of the causes of traffic accidents report no. DOT-HS-034-3-535-77, Indiana University (TAC), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington

  • Tsimhoni O, Yoo H, Green P (1999) Effects of visual demand and in-vehicle task complexity on driving and task performance as assessed by visual occlusion (Technical Report UMTRI-99-37), The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI

  • Tsimhoni O, Green P, Watanabe H (2001) Detecting and reading text on HUDs: effects of driving workload and message location. Paper presented at the 11th annual ITS America meeting, Miami, FL, CD-ROM

  • Van den Berg J, Landstrom U (2006) Symptoms of sleepiness while driving and their relationship to prior sleep, work and individual characteristics. Transp Res Part F 9:207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vöhringer-Kuhnt T, Karrer K, Schlienz N (2005) The effect of ‘sensation seeking’ on driver fatigue. In: Lisa Dorn (Hrsg) Driver behaviour and training. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hampshire pp 299–308

  • Warner WH, Özkan T, Lajunen T (2009) Cross-cultural differences in drivers’ speed choice accident analysis and prevention (in press)

  • Warshawsky-Livne L, Shiner D (2002) Effects of uncertainty, transmission type, driver age and gender on brake reaction and movement time. J Safety Res 33:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller G, Schlag B, Gatti G, Jorna R, van de Leur M (2006) Human factors in road design state of the art and empirical evidence Report 8.1 RiPCORD-iSEREST

  • Wickens CM, Toplak ME, Wiesenthal DL (2008) Cognitive failures as predictors of driving errors, lapses, and violations. Accid Anal Prev 40:1223–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman M (1994) Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The ITERATE project has received funding from the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 18496. The ITERATE consortium consists of seven partners: Statens väg och Transportforskningsinstitut (VTI) Sweden; University of Leeds, UK; University of Valenciennes, France; Kite Solutions s.n.c., Italy; Ben Gurion University, Israel; Chalmers University, Sweden; MTO Psykologi, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel

    Ilit Oppenheim & David Shinar

Authors
  1. Ilit Oppenheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Shinar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilit Oppenheim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oppenheim, I., Shinar, D. A context-sensitive model of driving behaviour and its implications for in-vehicle safety systems. Cogn Tech Work 14, 261–281 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0178-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0178-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation