Skip to main content
Log in

Adapting to change and uncertainty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding how people adapt to change and uncertainty is critical to system design, and good system design expands the ability of people to adapt. Cognitive systems engineering (CSE) enables us to understand work domains, reveal expertise, and derive essential features for systems. This is valuable because the demand for rapidly evolving systems such as information and communication technology does not allow for long-term deliberation by system developers. The publication of work by Norman, Hollnagel and Woods, and Rasmussen in the early 1980s provides an opportunity to consider where CSE stands nearly 30 years since its inception. The papers in this special issue of Cognition, Technology and Work convey insights from authors who have substantial firsthand experience with the use of CSE to study human adaptation to changing, uncertain work settings. Their research demonstrates the current state of CSE, the potential for CSE to reveal how people adapt to change and uncertainty, and implications for the design of complex adaptive systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Blumer H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J, Hatakenaka S, Rudolph J (2006) Naturalistic decision making and organizational decision making: exploring the intersections. Special issue on naturalistic decision making and organizational decision making: exploring the intersections. Organ Stud 27(7):1037–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook R, Woods D (1994) Operating at the sharp end: the complexity of human error. In: Bogner S (ed) Human error in medicine. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hilllsdale, pp 255–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersh JR, McNeely JA, Remington RW (2005) Cognitive engineering: understanding human interaction with complex systems. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Digest 26(4):377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods D (1983) Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles. Int J Hum Comput Stud 18:583–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson B, Hollnagel E (2006) Pre-requisites for large scale coordination. Special issue on large-scale coordination. Cogn Technol Work 9(1):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendonça D, Beroggi G, Wallace W (2001) Decision support for improvisation during emergency response operations. Intl J Emerg Mgt 1(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millitello L, Patterson E, Bowman L, Wears R (2007) Information flow during crisis management: challenges to coordination in the emergency operations center. Special issue on large-scale coordination. Cogn Technol Work 9(1):25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth C, Cook R, Woods D (2004) The messy details: insights from technical work in healthcare. Special issue on studies in healthcare technical work. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 34(6):689–692

  • Nemeth C, O’Connor M, Klock PA, Cook RI (2006) Discovering healthcare cognition: the use of cognitive artifacts to reveal cognitive work. Special issue on naturalistic decision making. Organ Stud 27(7):1011–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth C, Wears R, Woods DD, Hollnagel E, Cook RI (2008) Minding the gaps: creating resilience in healthcare. In: Henricksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML (eds) Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches. Performance and tools, AHRQ Publication No. 08-0034-3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, vol 3

  • Norman D (1981) Steps toward a cognitive engineering: system images, system friendliness, mental models. Symposium on models of human performance. Office of Naval Research Contractor’s Meeting, University of California, San Diego, LaJolla

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman D (2010) Why human systems integration fails (and why the university is the problem). Invited talk for the 30th anniversary of the Human-Systems Integration Board of the National Research Council. The National Academies, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman D (2011) Living with complexity. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson ES, Woods DD, Cook RI, Render ML (2007) Collaborative cross-checking to enhance resilience. Special issue on large-scale coordination. Cogn Technol Work 9(3):155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew R, Mavor A (eds) (2007) Human systems integration in the system development process: a new look. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human-machine interaction. North-Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth E, Multer J, Raslear T (2006) Shared situation awareness as a contributor to high reliability performance in railroad operations. Special issue on naturalistic decision making and organizational decision making: exploring the intersections. Organ Stud 27(7):967–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD (1988) Coping with complexity: the psychology of human behavior in complex systems. In: Goodstein LP, Andersen HB, Olsen SE (eds) Tasks, errors, and mental models. Taylor and Francis, New York, pp 128–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods D (2000). Studying cognitive systems in context: the cognitive systems triad. Institute for Ergonomics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Retrieved on 30 April 2005 from CSEL web site: http://csel.eng.ohio-state.edu/productions/woodscta/

  • Woods D, Branlat M (2011) Basic patterns in how adaptive systems fail. In: Hollnagel E, Paries J, Woods D, Wreathall J (eds) Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook. Ashgate Publishing, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods D, Hollnagel E (2006) Joint cognitive systems: patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woods D, Roth E (1988) Cognitive systems engineering. In: Helander M (ed) Handbook of human-computer interaction. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Lasome C, Moss J, Mackenzie C, Faraj S (2001) Cognitive properties of a whiteboard: a case study in a trauma centre. In: Proceedings of the seventh conference on European conference on computer supported cooperative work, Bonn, pp 259–278

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Nemeth is grateful to the authors who have contributed their work to this special issue, and to John Flach, Robert Wears, and especially David Woods for insightful comments on drafts of this essay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher P. Nemeth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nemeth, C.P. Adapting to change and uncertainty. Cogn Tech Work 14, 183–186 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0200-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0200-9

Keywords