Abstract
Human factors integration (HFI) is the principal method for applying human factors to the development of socio-technical systems across safety-critical industry. The method has been developed successfully across industries from the defence sector right through to the medical sector, with various forms of application. Countries that are now seeing a nuclear renaissance have both the opportunity to apply new practices but also the challenge of true and cost-effective integration of human factors in new build projects. In this paper, we provide a framework of generic goals and a question set to guide appropriate and effective application of the method to project phases. The framework describes three main human factors goals of feasibility, usability and reliability and attempts to map these goals to project phases. We apply these concepts to the nuclear industry and indicate how practical HFI can facilitate a systems and lifecycle approach to human factors in the nuclear industry. We discuss some of the key socio-technical challenges now facing the industry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANSI/AAMI American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (2009) HE75 Human Factors Engineering: Design of Medical Devices
Booher HR (ed) (1990) MANPRINT An approach to Systems Integration, Van Nostrand Reinhold
Booher HR (2003) Handbook of human systems integration. Wiley, London
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) (2003) Human Factors Engineering Program Plans Regulatory Guide G-276
Chapanis A, Garner WR, Morgan CT, Sanford FH (1949) Applied experimental psychology. Wiley, New York
Dekker S (2007) Just culture: balancing safety and accountability. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham
Hamilton WI (2009) Human factors past and present. In: Bust PD (ed) Contemporary Ergonomics 2009. Taylor & Francis, London
Hamilton WI (2011) Practical human factors integration, presented at ergonomics & human factors, institute of ergonomics and human factors. Stoke Rochford, Lincolnshire
Hamilton WI, Reeves G, Mack Z (2006) Integrating people, plant and process in the design and operation of process industry assets, paper presented at human factors issues in complex system performance, human factors and ergonomics society Europe chapter annual meeting, Sheffield, England
He X, Tong J (2006) Some considerations for implementing human reliability analysis for advanced reactors, ESREL2006. In: Soares G, Zio E (eds) Safety and reliability for managing risk. Taylor & Francis, London
Health and safety executive (2006) Safety assessment principles for nuclear facilities, ehf.1 engineering principles: human factors, integration with design, assessment and management, http://www.hse.gov.uk/nuclear/saps/saps2006.pdf
Health and Safety Executive, Technical Assessment Guides, http://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/nsd/tech_asst_guides/index.htm:
Kirwan B, Scannali S, Robinson L (1996) A case study of a human reliability assessment for an existing nuclear power plant. Applied Ergonomic 27(5):289–302
Kirwan B, Basra G, Taylor-Adams SE (1997) CORE-DATA: a computerised human error database for human reliability support, IEEE sixth annual human factors meeting. Orlando, Florida, USA
Kletz T (2009) What went wrong? Case histories of process plant disasters and how they could have been avoided. Butterworth-Heinemann, IChemE, Oxford
London Underground (2007) LU 1-217 A1 Integration of Human Factors into Systems Development, Cat 1 Standard
Ministry of Defence UK (2011) Acquisition Operation Framework, Policy, information and guidance on the Human Factors Integration aspects of UK MoD Defence Acquisition version 2.0.2, Uhttp://www.aof.mod.uk/aofcontent/tactical/hfi/content/hfi_whatis.htmU
Moon G, Hamilton WI (2011) A practical framework for organisational integrity, proposed paper submitted to the special issue of cognition, technology and work: The role of ergonomics and human factors (EHF) in nuclear safety
Network Rail (2004) Incorporating Ergonomics within Engineering Design Projects: Requirements (formerly RT/E/P/24020), Ref: NR/SP/ERG/24020, Issue 2
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2002) NUREG/CR-6690, the Effects of Interface Management Tasks on Crew Performance and Safety in Complex, Computer-Based Systems: Overview and Main Findings
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2004) NUREG-0711 Rev 2 human factors engineering program review model
Reason J (1997) Managing the Risks of Organisational Accidents. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham
T/AST/005 (2009) Issue 4: Rev 1 ONR guidance on the demonstration of ALARP
T/AST/013 (2009) Issue 3 External Hazards
T/AST/014 (2008) Issue 2 internal hazards
T/AST/027 (2010) Issue 003 training and assuring personnel competence
T/AST/028 (2000) Issue 002 control and instrumentation aspects of nuclear plant commissioning
T/AST/036 (2009) Issue 02 Diversity, redundancy, segregation and layout of mechanical plant
T/AST/038 (2009) Issue 02 radiological protection
T/AST/048 (2010) Issue 2 management of organisational change
T/AST/057 (2010) Issue 1 design safety assurance
T/AST/058 (2010) Appendix 2 (technical position statement) “putting ‘human performance’ in context with organisational and human factors”
T/AST/058 (2010) Issue 01 human factors integration
T/AST/059 (2010) Issue 01, human machine interface
T/AST/061 (2010) Issue 1 staffing levels and task organisation
T/AST/063 (2009) Issue 001 HRA
T/AST/065 (2008) Issue 001 function and content of the nuclear baseline
Trist E, Bamforth W (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the long wall method of coal-getting. Hum Relat 4:3–38
Umbers I, Edmunds J, Kirwan B, Gibson H, Kennedy R, Bowie J (2008) Peer review of the NARA HRA technique, probabilistic safety assessment and management conference PSAM 9, Hong Kong, China
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamilton, W.I., Kazem, M.L.N., He, X. et al. Practical human factors integration in the nuclear industry. Cogn Tech Work 15, 5–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0213-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0213-z