Skip to main content
Log in

A human performance programme to improve front-line nuclear operations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Safe and reliable operations in high-hazard industries are of paramount importance not only to the managers of the organisation and the people that work for them but also to the members of the public who live near the facilities or who may be affected if something was to go wrong. Any operational high-hazard industry should have systems and processes in place to ensure that the likelihood of a significant event occurring is very low. However, taken on a global scale, such events still occur and investigations into them have highlighted a range of problems ranging from engineering deficiencies through to organisational cultures that do not support safe and reliable operations. The challenge is, therefore, for all industries, which have systems in place to guard against such low-frequency, high-consequence events to ensure that the barriers remain robust and not weakened in any way. Through the experience of the National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL), this paper outlines work carried out to increase the levels of awareness of human fallibility in the workplace at NNL as a part of a high-reliability organisation strategy to protect against a low-frequency, high-consequence event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/SP/STAGING/local_assets/assets/pdfs/Baker_panel_report.pdf (link obtained on 31/5/2011).

  2. http://www.eurocontrol.int/eec/gallery/content/public/document/eec/report/2006/017_Swiss_Cheese_Model.pdf (link obtained on 9/8/2011).

  3. http://www.hse.gov.uk/humanfactors/topics/magicbullet.pdf (link obtained on 31/5/2011).

  4. http://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/nsd/tech_asst_guides/tast058-app2.htm. This is a reference guide provided by the HSE (link obtained on 31/5/2011).

References

  • HSG48 (1999) Reducing error and influencing behaviour, HSE Books, ISBN 0717624528, p 2

  • INPO Good Practice (2005) Human performance tools for engineers: practices for anticipating, preventing, and catching engineering errors, March 2005, Good Practice, INPO 05-002

  • INPO (2006) Human performance tools for workers, 06-002 April 2006. http://www.efcog.org/wg/ism_pmi_hpi/docs/DOE_and_INPO_Documents/Mgr&SupHUToolsTool4-17-07.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2012

  • Institute of nuclear power operation (1997) Excellence in human performance, INPO, Atlanta, GA

  • van Wijk L, Taylor R, May J (2008) “Cultural and organisational factors leading to major events”. Topsafe, Dubrovnik, Croatia. October 2008

  • WANO GL (2002) World Association of Nuclear operators, principles for excellence in human performance. http://www.wano.org.uk/WANO_Documents/Inside_WANO/Vol14No3/Vol14No3_en.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr Mark Edmiston for his advice and direction in the production of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah L. Peck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peck, S.L. A human performance programme to improve front-line nuclear operations. Cogn Tech Work 15, 29–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0216-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-012-0216-9

Keywords

Navigation