Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How do environmental characteristics at intersections change in their relevance for drivers before entering an intersection: analysis of drivers’ gaze and driving behavior in a driving simulator study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accident studies in Germany found that in about 90 % of intersection accidents, failure to acquire the relevant information of the driving situation was the main reason for drivers’ errors (Vollrath et al. in Ableitung von Anforderungen an Fahrerassistenzsysteme aus Sicht der Verkehrssicherheit. Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven, 2006). Studies of bicycle–car accidents assume that improper attention allocation strategies and unjustified expectations by drivers are important for this kind of error (Räsänen and Summala in Accid Anal Prev 30:657–666, 1998). Aim of the study was to examine the psychological processes of drivers’ attention allocation and driving behavior in different intersection situations varied by two environmental characteristics. A give way T-intersection was varied by (1) low and high traffic density of oncoming cars from the left and (2) number of task-relevant information areas (in addition to the oncoming cars from the left with or without pedestrians on the right). It was examined how these environmental characteristics change in their relevance for drivers while entering the intersections. The analysis was conducted in three intersection epochs (Approaching, Waiting, Accelerating). A total of 40 subjects (26 male, 14 female), ranged in age from 19 to 55 years (M = 31.0 years), participated in the study. The results showed that drivers’ attention allocation (e.g., mean gaze duration) and driving behavior (e.g., waiting time) systematically depends on these environmental characteristics which require different actions of the driver and change in their relevance when entering an intersection. The results support the idea of attention allocation strategies by drivers which are specific for certain driving situations. These findings can support approaches of driver modeling at intersections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown ID (2005) Review of the ‘Looked but failed to see’ accident causation factor (Road Safety Research Report No. 60). Department for Transport, London

  • Cairney P, Catchpole J (1996) Patterns of perceptual failures at intersections of arterial roads and local streets. In: Gale AG, Brown ID, Haslegrave CM, Taylor SP (eds) Vision in vehicles V. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell JR (1966) A queueing model of many-instrument visual sampling. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electron 7:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell JR, Ward JL, Senders JW (1968) A queueing model of visual sampling: experimental validation. IEEE Trans Man–Mach Syst 9:82–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen CW, James JD (1986) Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Percept Psychophys 40:225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkmer T, Nilsson L, Törnros J (2000) Detection and identification of information presented peripherally inside the car—effects of driving task demands, stimulus position and direction of motion of the stimulus (VTI rapport 461A). Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute

  • Fuerstenberg K, Hopstock MH, Obojski A, Rössler B, Chen J, Deutschle S, Benson C, Weingart J, Chinea Manrique de Lara A (2007) INTERSAFE a PReVENT Project, 40.75 Final Report, Project Evaluation and Effectiveness of the Intersection Safety System, Brussels

  • Graab B, Donner E, Chiellino U, Hoppe M (2008) Analyse von Verkehrsunfällen hinsichtlich unterschiedlicher Fahrerpopulationen und daraus ableitbarer Ergebnisse für die Entwicklung adaptiver Fahrerassistenzsysteme. In: Proceedings of the conference active safety through driver assistance. München

  • Henning MJ, Kienast H, Lindner P, Weigel H, Krems FJ, Spanner-Ulmer B, Wanielik G (2008) Multifunktionale Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle. In: Maurer M, Stiller C (eds) Tagungsband des 5. Workshops Fahrerassistenzsysteme FAS 2008, Universität Karlsruhe. fmrt e.V., Karlsruhe, pp 151–158

  • Herslund M-B, Jørgensen NO (2003) Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. Accid Anal Prev 35:885–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills BL (1980) Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception 9:183–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe M, Zobel R, Schlag B (2007) Identifikation von Einflussgrößen auf Verkehrsunfälle als Grundlage für die Beurteilung von Fahrerassistenzsystemen am Beispiel von Kreuzungsunfällen. In: Wissensforum VDI (ed) Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert. Human machine interface. VDI, Düsseldorf, pp 121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrey WJ, Wickens CD (2004) Driving and side task performance: the effects of display clutter, separation, and modality. Hum Factors 46:611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrey WJ, Wickens CD, Consalus KP (2006) Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. J Exp Psychol 12:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Koustanaï A, Boloix E, Van Elslande P, Bastien C (2008) Statistical analysis of “looked-but-failed-to-see“accidents: highlighting the involvement of two distinct mechanisms. Accid Anal Prev 40:461–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger H-P, Grein M, Kaussner A, Mark C (2005) SILAB—a task-oriented driving simulation. In: Proceedings of the driving simulator conference (DSC). Orlando, pp 232–331

  • Kulmala R, Beilinson L (1991) Bicyclist safety at junctions. In: Proceedings of the fourth workshop of ICTCT. Vienna, Austria, pp 111–122

  • Lange C (2005) The development and usage of Dikablis (Digital wireless gaze tracking system). In: Abstract of the thirteenth European conference on eye movements. Bern, Switzerland, p 50

  • Laquai F, Rigoll G, Duschl M, Popiv D, Rakicx M (2010) Geschwindigkeitsbeeinflussung durch großflächige abstrakte optische Anzeigen. In: Tagungsband “Sicherheit durch Fahrerassistenz”, München

  • Mahlke S, Rösler D, Seifert K, Krems JF, Thüring M (2007) Evaluation of six night vision enhancement systems: qualitative and quantitative support for intelligent image processing. Hum Factors 49:518–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray N (1986) Monitoring behaviour and supervisory control. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbook of perception and performance (Vol. II). Wiley, New York, pp 40.1–40.51

  • Muhrer E, Vollrath M (2010) Expectations while car following—the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task. Accid Anal Prev 42:2158–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasanen E (1992) The problem of right-turning drivers with cyclists coming from right (Report L4). Traffic Planning Department, Helsinki

  • Plavsic M, Bengler K, Bubb H (2010a) Analysis of glance movements in critical intersection scenarios. In: Proceedings of the third international conference of applied human factors and ergonomics (AHFE), Miami, U.S.

  • Plavsic M, Guzman E, Bengler K (2010b) Modelling control behavior for the cognitive driver model. In: Proceedings of the second European conference on human centered design for intelligent transport system, HUMANIST Berlin, Germany

  • Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32:3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen M, Summala H (1998) Attention and expectation problems in bicycle–car collisions: an in-depth study. Accid Anal Prev 30:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan MA, Lee JD, Young KL (2009) Driver distraction: theory, effects, and mitigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumar K (1990) The basic driver error: late detection. Ergonomics 33:1281–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabey BE, Staughton GC (1975) Interacting roles of road environment, vehicle and road user in accidents. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference of the International Association for Accident and Traffic Medicine, London

  • Senders JW (1964) The human operator as a monitor and controller of multidegree of freedom systems. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electron 5:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senders JW (1983) Visual scanning processes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Tilburg Press, Netherlands

  • Sheridan TB (1970) On how often the supervisor should sample. IEEE Trans Syst Sci Cybern 6:140–145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Staughton GC, Storie VJ (1977) Methodology of an in-depth accident investigation survey (TRRL Laboratory Report 762). Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne

  • Summala H, Räsänen M (2000) Top-down and bottom-up processes in driver behaviour at roundabouts and crossroads. Transp Hum Factors 2:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summala H, Pasanen E, Räsänen M, Sievänen J (1996) Bicycle accidents and drivers’ visual search at left and right turns. Accid Anal Prev 28:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman AM, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12:97–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor T, Jarlengrip J (2005) Method and system for presenting information. Technical Report PCT WO 2005/054786 A1, International Bureau: World Intellectual Property Organization, International application published under the patent cooperation treaty

  • Vollrath M, Briest S, Drewes J (2006) Ableitung von Anforderungen an Fahrerassistenzsysteme aus Sicht der Verkehrssicherheit (Bericht der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Fahrzeugtechnik, Heft F 60). Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven

    Google Scholar 

  • Werneke J, Vollrath M (2012) What does the driver look at? The influence of intersection characteristics on attention allocation and driving behavior. Accid Anal Prev 45:610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werneke J, Vollrath M (2013) How to present collision warnings at intersections? A comparison of different approaches. Accid Anal Prev 52:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, McCarley JS (2008) Applied attention theory. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Helleberg J, Goh J, Xu X, Horrey WJ (2001) Pilot task management: testing an attentional expected value model of visual scanning (Technical Report ARL-01-14/NASA-01-7). University of Illinois, Aviation Research Lab, Savoy

  • Wickens CD, Goh J, Helleberg J, Horrey WJ, Talleur DA (2003) Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Hum Factors 45:360–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierwille WW, Tijerina L (1995) Eine Analyse von Unfallberichten als ein Mittel zur Bestimmung von Problemen, die durch die Verteilung der visuellen Aufmerksamkeit und der visuellen Belastung innerhalb des Fahrzeugs verursacht werden. Zeitschrift für Verkehrssicherheit 41:164–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has received funding from the Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Applied Mechanics in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Vehicle Safety, Department of Applied Mechanics, Accident Prevention Group, Chalmers University of Technology, Lindholmspiren 3, 412 96, Göteborg, Sweden

    Julia Werneke

  2. Department of Traffic and Engineering Psychology, TU Braunschweig, Gaußstrasse 23, 38106, Braunschweig, Germany

    Mark Vollrath

Authors
  1. Julia Werneke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Vollrath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Werneke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Werneke, J., Vollrath, M. How do environmental characteristics at intersections change in their relevance for drivers before entering an intersection: analysis of drivers’ gaze and driving behavior in a driving simulator study. Cogn Tech Work 16, 157–169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-013-0254-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-013-0254-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation