Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tales of disaster: the role of accident storytelling in safety teaching

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Is it appropriate to tell tales about accidents as a form of teaching? Storytelling about accidents is an intrinsic part of safety education, but the role and nature of these stories deserves critical consideration. Even accident reports themselves are reconstructed interpretations of events, and accident stories are at least one step further removed. Knowledge about specific accidents is uncertain and unsuitable as a learning outcome. However, accident stories play a role in teaching by creating learning experiences through which students can acquire threshold concepts in safety science. The realism of a well-told story, combined with uncertainty and subjectivity surrounding its interpretation, creates an environment that promotes transformative learning. Narrative choices can make the difference between effective story-based teaching and oversimplified hindsight explanations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Alexander RD, Rae AJ, Nicholson M (2010) Matching goals and methods in system safety engineering. In: Presented at the IET system safety conference, Manchester

  • Arezes PM, Swuste P (2012) Occupational health and safety post-graduation courses in Europe: a general overview. Saf Sci 50(3):433–442. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASSE (2004) Safety curriculum guidelines. Retrieved 9 April 2015, from http://www.asse.org/professionalaffairs/govtaffairs/ngposi18/

  • Atherton JS (2013) Health and safety and threshold concepts. Retrieved 10 Nov 2014, from http://www.doceo.co.uk/tools/TC_HandS.htm

  • Aven T (2014) What is safety science? Saf Sci 67:15–20. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie C, Bowden JA, Meyer JHF (2013) Threshold capabilities: threshold concepts and knowledge capability linked through variation theory. High Educ 65(2):227–246. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9540-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman A, Gray B, Moffat J, Simpson E, Rivara F (2002) Mobilizing for pedestrian safety: an experiment in community action. Inj Prev 8(4):264–267. doi:10.1136/ip.8.4.264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter K (1993) The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educ Res 22(1):5–18. doi:10.3102/0013189X022001005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen ET, Washington S (2007) Tell me a story…using stories to improve occupational safety training. In: Proceedings of ASSE’s safety 2007, Orlando, FL, USA

  • Dannels DP (2000) Learning to be professional: technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. J Bus Tech Commun 14(1):5–37. doi:10.1177/105065190001400101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson L (2008) Tragedy in the adventure playground: media representations of mountaineering accidents in New Zealand. Leis Stud 27(1):3–19. doi:10.1080/02614360701240972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker S (2011) The criminalization of human error in aviation and healthcare: a review. Saf Sci 49(2):121–127. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker S, Cilliers P, Hofmeyr J-H (2011) The complexity of failure: implications of complexity theory for safety investigations. Saf Sci 49(6):939–945. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delatte N (2010) Failure literacy in structural engineering. Eng Struct 32(7):1952–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D, Ashmore M, Potter J (1995) Death and furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism. Hist Hum Sci 8(2):25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle N (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. In: Presented at the teaching and learning research programme conference, Leicester

  • Frye N (1957) Anatomy of criticism. Princeton UP, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert J, Hipkins R, Cooper G (2005) Faction or fiction: using narrative pedagogy in school science education. In: Presented at the redesigning pedagogy: research, policy, practice conference, Singapore

  • Hayes J, Maslen S (2014) Knowing stories that matter: learning for effective safety decision-making. J Risk Res. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.910690

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid CF (2004) Can case studies be used to teach critical thinking? J Coll Sci Teach 33(6):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Herreid CF (2007) Start with a story: the case study method of teaching college science. NSTA Press, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Goteman O (2004) The functional resonance accident model. Cogn Syst Eng Process Plant 2004:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway CM, Johnson CW (2006) Why system safety professionals should read accident reports. In: Presented at the IET system safety conference, London. Retrieved from http://archive.org/details/nasa_techdoc_20060020178

  • Houdmont J, Leka S, Bulger C (2008) The definition of curriculum areas in occupational health psychology, vol 3. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 145–170. Retrieved from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/960/

  • Hunt P (1990) New directions in narrative theory. Child Lit Assoc Q 15(2):46–47. doi:10.1353/chq.0.0809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group (1991) Safety culture. International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IOSH (2013) Accreditation of qualifications. IOSH, Wigston

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C (2003) Failure in safety critical systems: a handbook of accident and incident reporting. University of Glasgow Press, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C (2011) Competency management systems to support accident and incident investigators. Las Vegas. Retrieved from http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~johnson/papers/ISSC2011/investigator_training.pdf

  • Katz SM (1993) The entry-level engineer: problems in transition from student to professional. J Eng Educ 82(3):171–174. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.1993.tb00097.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (1995) Medical devices: the therac-25. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson N (2011) Engineering a safer world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg J, Rollenhagen C, Hollnagel E (2009) What-you-look-for-is-what-you-find—the consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals. Saf Sci 47(10):1297–1311. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairal G (2011) The history and the narrative of risk in the media. Health Risk Soc 13(1):65–79. doi:10.1080/13698575.2010.540313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitlis S (2012) Narrative analysis. In: Symon G, Cassell C (eds) Qualitative organizational research: core methods and current challenges. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 492–511

  • Martin BE, Brouwer W (1991) The sharing of personal science and the narrative element in science education. Sci Educ 75(6):707–722. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey DN (1990) Storytelling in economics. In: Nash C (ed) Narrative in culture: the uses of storytelling in the sciences, philosophy, and literature. Routledge, New York  

  • McKee R (2010) Story: style, structure, substance, and the principles of screenwriting, 1st edn. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Land R (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. University of Edinburgh, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrete A, Lartigue C (2004) Learning from education to communicate science as a good story. Endeavour 28(3):120–124. doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2004.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor P (2011) Assessing the effectiveness of bridge resource management training. Int J Aviat Psychol 21(4):357–374. doi:10.1080/10508414.2011.606755

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae AJ, Hawkins R (2012) Risk assessment in the wild. In: Presented at the Australian safety critical systems conference, Brisbane

  • Rae AJ, Nicholson M, Alexander RD (2010) The state of practice in system safety research evaluation. In: Presented at the IET system safety conference, Manchester

  • Rae AJ, McDermid J, Alexander RD (2012) The science and superstition of quantitative risk assessment. In: Presented at the annual European safety and reliability conference, Helsinki

  • Rochlin GI (1999) Safe operation as a social construct. Ergonomics 42(11):1549–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh JH, Pendley CC (2012) From learning from accidents to teaching about accident causation and prevention: multidisciplinary education and safety literacy for all engineering students. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:105–113. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanne JM (2008) Incident reporting or storytelling? Competing schemes in a safety-critical and hazardous work setting. Saf Sci 46(8):1205–1222. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone DA (1989) Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Polit Sci Q 104(2):281–300. doi:10.2307/2151585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BA (1976) The organizational and interorganizational development of disasters. Adm Sci Q 21(3):378–397. doi:10.2307/2391850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TV Tropes (2013) Chekhov’s Gun—TV Tropes. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ChekhovsGun. Retrieved 11 May 2015

  • Tyler L (2005) Towards a postmodern understanding of crisis communication. Public Relat Rev 31(4):566–571. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan D (2004) Theorizing disaster: analogy, historical ethnography, and the challenger accident. Ethnography 5(3):315–347. doi:10.1177/1466138104045659

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch Disaster. Adm Sci Q 38(4):628–652. doi:10.2307/2393339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock K (2008) Content analysis of 100 consecutive media reports of amusement ride accidents. Accid Anal Prev 40(1):89–96. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.04.007

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock K, Drury CG, Smiley A, Ma J (2005) Using simulated investigations for accident investigation studies. Appl Ergon 36(1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2004.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Rae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rae, A. Tales of disaster: the role of accident storytelling in safety teaching. Cogn Tech Work 18, 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0341-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0341-3

Keywords