Skip to main content
Log in

The development of a new integral control model based on the analysis of three complex systems in Serbia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse the results of research carried out in the railway, mining, and electric power systems in Serbia and form a new integral control model. The three methodological procedures are applied. First, analytical-synthetic methodological approach breaks down complex technical system into three parts: bio-cybernetic system, “operator”; technical system, “technology”; and additional system, “working environment.” Second, network planning method is used to analyse time, according to the critical path method. Third, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process determines the key research factors. General results of research are new integral control model, and new research areas and activities. The most prominent factors are: in “bio-cybernetic system”—operator’s arm reach, body postures and movement sequences, operator’s work, occurrence of stress, and occurrence of fatigue; in “technical system”—location and dimension of control desk, display panel, video display terminal, symbols on video display terminal, colours in control centres, and suitability of the keyboards; and in “supporting system”—illumination in control centres and relative humidity. Based on the analysis of factors and synthesis of results, the following recommendation are proposed: new control desk design; new display panel design; new design of the main and local lighting; new illumination and contrast characteristics, and environmental impact assessment. For research on a variety of complex technical systems, new integral control model can be applied, with corresponding extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguarón J, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2003) The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):137–145

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bulut E, Duru O, Keçeci T, Yoshidaa S (2012) Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: a process model for shipping asset management. Expert Syst Appl 39(2):1911–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis L, Schmid F, Tobias A (2014) Managing incidents in a complex system: a railway case study. Cogn Technol Work 16(2):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadashi N, Wilson JR, Golightly D, Sharples S, Clarke T (2013) Practical use of work analysis to support rail electrical control rooms: a case of alarm handling. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 227(2):148–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner D (2003) Die Logik des Misslingens. Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen (The logic of failure. Strategic thinking in complex situations), 11th edn. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos IJAL, Farias MS, Ferraz FT, Haddad AN, Hecksher S (2013) Human factors applied to alarm panel modernization of nuclear control room. J Loss Prevent Proc 26(6):1308–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funke J (2010) Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition? Cogn Process 11:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grauel BM, Kluge A, Adolph L (2013) Analyse vorausgehender Bedinungen für die Unterstützung mikrokognitiver Prozesse in Teams in der industriellen Instandhaltung (Anaysis of precedent conditions to support macro-cognitive processes in industrial maintenance teams). In: Soeffker D, Kluge A (eds) Kognitive Systeme (Cognitive Systems), Universität Duisburg-Essen

  • Grozdanovic M (2003) Ergonomsko projektovanje centara za kontrolu i upravljanje automatizovanim sistemima (Ergonomic design of control and managing centres of automated systems). University of Nis, Nis

    Google Scholar 

  • Grozdanovic M, Janackovic GL, Stojiljkovic E (2015a) The selection of the key ergonomic indicators influencing work efficiency in railway control rooms. Trans Inst Meas Control. doi:10.1177/0142331215579948

    Google Scholar 

  • Grozdanovic M, Savic S, Marjanovic D (2015b) Assessment of the key factors for ergonomic design of management information systems in coal mines. Int J Min Reclam Environ 29(2):96–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann V, Kluge A, Ritzmann S (2012) Flexibility under complexity: work contexts, task profiles and team processes of high responsibility teams. Empl Relat 34:322–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iskander WH, Nutter RS (1998) Methodology development for safety and reliability analysis for electrical mine monitoring systems. Microelectron Reliab 28:581–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivergard T, Hunt B (2008) Handbook of control room design and ergonomics: a perspective for the future. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janackovic GL, Grozdanovic M (2016) Aspects influencing work efficiency in electric power distribution control rooms. Hum Factor Ergon Man (in print)

  • Kluge A, Schüler K, Burkolter D (2008) Simulatortrainings für Prozesskontrolltätigkeiten am Beispiel von Raffinerien: Psychologische Trainingsprinzipien in der Praxis (Simulator trainings for process control tasks using the example of refineries: psychological training principles for practice). Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 62(2):97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin CJ, Feng WY, Chao CJ, Tseng FY (2008) Effects of VDT workstation lighting conditions on operator visual workload. Ind Health 46(2):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynas D, Horberry T (2011) Human factor issues with automated mining equipment. Ergon Open J 4:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjanovic D (2003) Ergonomsko projektovanje informaciono upravljackih sistema u rudnicima uglja sa podzemnom eksploatacijom (Ergonomic design of control centers in underground coal mines). Master thesis, University of Nis, Faculty of Occupational Safety, Nis

  • Proctor RW, van Zandt T (2008) Human factors in simple and complex systems, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (2008) The human contribution. Unsafe acts, accidents, and heroic recoveries. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon PM, Stanton NA, Walker GH, Jenkins D, Baber C, McMaster R (2008) Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: a case study in the energy distribution domain. Ergonomics 51(5):367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savioja P, Liinasuo M, Koskinen H (2014) User experience: does it matter in complex systems? Cogn Technol Work 16(4):429–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Blandford A, Back J (2008) Questioning, exploring, narrating and playing in the control room to maintain system safety. Cogn Tech Work 11:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (2007) Monitoring a nuclear power plant. In: Kramer F, Wiegmann DA, Kirlik A (eds) Attention: from theory to practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 90–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente K, Mumaw R, Roth E (2004) Operator monitoring in a complex dynamic work environment: a qualitative cognitive model based on field observations. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 5(5):359–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vongpaisal S, Li G, Pakalins R, Brady T (2011) New development of expert system module for a decision-making on mine stope stability in underground blast hole mining operations. Int J Min Reclam Environ 25:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker GH, Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Jenkins DP, Rafferty LA (2010) Translating the concepts of complexity to the field of ergonomics. Ergonomics 53(10):1175–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller MJ, Gupta N, Giambatista RC (2004) Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental models on control crew performance. Manage Sci 50:1534–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Hollands JG, Banbury S, Parasuraman R (2015) Engineering psychology and human performance, 4th edn. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goran L. Janackovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grozdanovic, M., Janackovic, G.L. The development of a new integral control model based on the analysis of three complex systems in Serbia. Cogn Tech Work 18, 761–776 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0389-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0389-8

Keywords

Navigation