Abstract
Organizations are looking for ways to sustain incremental improvements. For this end, we developed a Computer-Aided Employee Suggestion Management System (CAESMS) called STARS. The need was to make the problem visible and support employees in their efforts to reduce waste and increase employee satisfaction. Because human interaction with technology in the context of work can be very challenging, an introduction process called “1,2,3 STARS” was designed to set up STARS smoothly and support the transition. The proposed solution was tested in three working conditions to assess its relevance and limitations. Each test lasted 16 weeks. Indicators from these tests were compared to a reference study based on a non-technological experimentation based on a similar problem-solving methodology (Restrepo et al. in Int J Health Care Qual Assur 29(3):253–266. doi:10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2015-0022, 2016). The introduction of STARS technology provided relevant qualitative and quantitative results: (1) the cycle time for closing actions was reduced by 19.04% compared to the earlier study; (2) the number of actions in progress at the same time was also reduced by 49.82% from the earlier study; and (3) the leadership routine substantially increases the chances of introducing CAESMS on a long-term basis.





Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Amoako-Gyampah K, Salam AF (2004) An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf Manag 41(6):731–745
Antony J, Kumar M, Madu CN (2005) Six sigma in small-and medium-sized UK manufacturing enterprises: some empirical observations. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 22(8):860–874
Baranzini D, Christou MD (2009) Human factors data traceability and analysis in the European Community’s Major Accident Reporting System. Cogn Technol Work 12(1):1–12
Blohm I, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H (2013) Crowdsourcing: how to benefit from (too) many great ideas. MIS Q Exec 12(4):199–211
Boyle TA, Bishop AC, Duggan K, Reid C, Mahaffey T, MacKinnon NJ, Mahaffey A (2014) Keeping the “continuous” in continuous quality improvement: exploring perceived outcomes of CQI program use in community pharmacy. Res Soc Adm Pharm 10(1):45–57
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340
Fairbank JF, Williams SD (2001) Motivating creativity and enhancing innovation through employee suggestion system technology. Creat Innov Manag 10(2):68–74
Fairbank J, Spangler W, Williams SD (2003) Motivating creativity through a Computer-Mediated Employee Suggestion Management System. Behav Inf Technol 22(5):305–314
Ghazizadeh M, Lee JD, Boyle LN (2012) Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cogn Technol Work 14(1):39–49
Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine 14(6):1–4
Jacobson GH, McCoin NS, Lescallette R, Russ S, Slovis CM (2009) Kaizen: a method of process improvement in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 16(12):1341–1349
Kemp MJ, Low GC (2008) ERP innovation implementation model incorporating change management. Bus Process Manag J 14(2):228–242
Lasrado F, Arif M, Rizvi A (2015) The determinants for sustainability of an employee suggestion system. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 32(2):182–210
Lencioni PM (2002) The five dysfunctions of a team: a leadership fable, vol 13. Wiley
Mann D (2010) Creating a lean culture: tools to sustain lean conversions, 2nd edn. Productivity Press, New York
Marksberry P, Bustle Joshua, Clevinger Jeff (2011) Problem solving for managers: a mathematical investigation of Toyota’s 8-step process. J Manuf Technol Manag 22(7):837–852
Øvretveit John (2002) Producing useful research about quality improvement. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 15(7):294–302
Parry GC, Turner CE (2006) Application of lean visual process management tools. Prod Plan Control 17(1):77–86
Restrepo D, Charron-Latour J, Pourmonet H, Bassetto S (2016) Seizing opportunities for change at the operational level. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 29(3):253–266. doi:10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2015-0022
Savageau J (1996) World class suggestion systems still work well. J Qual Particip 19(2):86
Saxton GD, Oh O, Kishore R (2013) Rules of crowdsourcing: models, issues, and systems of control. Inf Syst Manag 30(1):2–20
Sirkin HL, Keenan P, Jackson A (2005) The hard side of change management. Harvard Bus Rev 83(10):108
Warda RP (2009) Define your organization’s culture to effect lasting change. Qual Prog 6:30–36
Zairi M (1997) Business process management: a boundaryless approach to modern competitiveness. Bus Process Manag J 3(1):64–80
Acknowledgements
This work is taking care by the Polytechnique Montreal’s CIMAR-LAB team for the next NSERC Discovery Grants 2017-2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Charron-Latour, J., Bassetto, S. & Pourmonet, H. STARS: the implementation of a Computer-Aided Employee Suggestion Management System to operationalize a continuous improvement process. Cogn Tech Work 19, 179–190 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0401-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0401-3