Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Integrating operational and risk information with system risk models in air traffic control

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The next generation Air Transport Management (ATM) requires performance-based safety management that is fully integrated into seamless operational management. To realize this objective, a framework is proposed in this article that structures risk information on ATM consoles in terms of four design principles: (i) integrating operational and safety-related data, (ii) managing interactions and minimizing transfer of risks to other sectors, (iii) generating risk patterns from accumulated experience and (iv) managing resources and safety barriers. The framework is applied to an approach control unit of a regional airport for the design of a performance dashboard that is linked to a safety module for managing hazards and safety barriers. In this sense, safety management is not an additional task to normal operations since risk information is integrated with operational data on a daily basis. Furthermore, the safety module combines traditional elements of bow-ties with new safety indices such as complexity metrics and risk patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • ARMS Working Group (2007–2010) The ARMS methodology for operational risk assessment in aviation organizations. Retrieved March 2016 from website: http://www.easa.eu.int/essi/documents/Methodology.pdf

  • Aven T (2012) The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BEA—Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation civile, 2012. Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330–203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro—Paris

  • Beck HP, Dzindolet MT, Pierce LG (2002) Applying a decision-making model to understand misuse, disuse and appropriate automation use. In: Salas E (ed) Advances in human factors and cognitive engineering: automation, vol 2. JAI press, Amsterdam, pp 37–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouarfa S, Blom HAP, Curran R, Everdij M (2013) Agent-based modeling and simulation of emergent behavior in air transportation. Complex Adapt Syst Model 1:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert-Smith H, Dickinson KL, Champ PA, Flores N (2013) Social amplification of wildfire risk: the role of social interactions and information sources. Risk Anal 33:800–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill J, McDonald N, Losa G (2011) Intelligent planning and the design of a new risk based, intelligent flight plan. Cognit Technol Work 13(1):43–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan S, Martensson L, Kay A, Okwirs S, Ulfvengren P, McDonald N (2015) Preparing for Airport collaborative decision making (A-CDM) implementation: an evaluation and recommendations. Cognit Technol Work 17(2):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corver S, Grote G (2016) Uncertainty management in enroute air traffic control: a field study exploring controller strategies and requirements for automation. Cognit Technol Work 18(3):541–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall B, Klein GA, Hoffman RR (2006) Working minds: a practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo DC, Fenoulhet T (2011) The single European sky (SES): buidling Europe in the sky. In: Crespo DC, de Leon PM (eds) Achieving the single Europen sky: goals and challenges. The Netherlands, Wolters Kluwer, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker SW (2011) Drift into failure: from hunting broken components to understanding complex systems. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cioccio A, Morel G (2013) Trade-offs between safety and production during technical assistance of aircraft operations. In: 5th Resilience engineering international symposium, Soesterberg (The Netherlands), 25–27 June 2013

  • Fruhen LS, Mearns KJ, Flin R, Kirwan B (2014) Safety intelligence: an exploration of senior managers’ characteristics. Appl Ergon 45:967–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall L, Underhil N, Rodrigguez Y, DeLaura R (2013) Data driven evaluation of flight re-route air traffic management decision support-tool. In: Landry SJ (ed) Advances in human aspects of aviation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilburn B (2004) Cognitive complexity in air traffic control: a literature review. In: Eurocontrol, EEC note no. 04/04

  • Hollnagel E (2009) The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off: why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2014) Safety-I and Safety-II: The past and future of safety management. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAO (2013) Safety management manual (SMM). Document 9859, AN/474, 3rd edn. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAO (2016) ICAo business plan 2017–2019. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Karikawa D, Aoyama H, Takahashi M, Furuta K, Wakabayashi T, Kitamura M (2013) A visualization tool of enroute air traffic control tasks for describing controller’s proactive management of traffic situations. Cogn Technol Work 15(2):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan B (2013) Safety intelligence for ATM CEOs: a white paper. Eurocontrol, Bretigny

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopardekar P, Schwartz A, Magyarits S, Rhodes J (2007) Airspace complexity measurement: an air traffic control simulation analysis. In: 7th USA/Europe air traffic management R/D seminar, Barcelona, Spain

  • Loft S, Sanderson P, Neal A, Mooij M (2007) Modeling and predicting mental workload in en route air traffic control: critical review and broader implications. J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 49:376–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakis S, Kontogiannis T (2014) Exploring team sense-making in air traffic control (ATC): insights from a field study in low visibility operations. Cognit Technol Work 16(2):211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakis S, Kontogiannis T, Psaros P (2014) Monitoring and evaluating failure-sensitive strategies in air traffic control simulator training. In: 7th International conference on PErvasive technologies related to assistive environments (PETRA), 27–30 May 2014, Rhodes, Greece

  • Malin JT (2000). Preparing for the unexpected: Making remote autonomous agents capable of interdependent teamwork. In: Proceedings of the IEA2000/HFES 2000 congress, human factors and ergonomics society. pp. 254–257

  • Martin GP, McKee L, Dixon-Woods M (2015) Beyond metrics? Utilizing ‘soft intelligence’for healthcare quality and safety. Soc Sci Med 142:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masalonis AJ, Callaham MB, Wanke CR (2003) Dynamic density and complexity metrics for real time traffic flow management. In: Proceedings of the 5th USA/Europe air traffic management R & D seminar, Budapest, Hungary

  • Masson M, Morier Y (2011) Methodology to assess future risks. European aviation safety plan (EASp). Action EME 1.1 of the European aviation safety plan (EASp), EASA, and the FAST—presented to ECAST. pp. 4–12

  • McDonald N (2006) Organizational resilience and industrial risk. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 205–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel G, Amalberti R, Chauvin C (2009) How good micro/macro ergonomics may improve resilience, but not necessarily safety. Saf Sci 47:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty D, Jarvis S (2013). Trade-Offs as symptoms of mismatches between sociotechnical systems: a case study involving commercial aviation and air traffic control. In: 5th Resilience engineering international symposium, Soesterberg (The Netherlands), 25–27 June 2013

  • Moxey A, Robertson J, Newby D, Hains I, Williamson M, Pearson S (2010) Computerized clinical decision support for prescribing: provision does not guarantee uptake. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza G, Goldhaber S (2009) Computerized decision support for the cardio-vascular clinician: applications for venous thrombo-embolism prevention and beyond. Circulation 120:1133–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan MS, Habli I, Kelly TP, Guhnemann A, Pozzi S, Johnson CW (2017) How can health care organizations make and justify decisions about risk reduction? Reliab Eng Syst Saf 161:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma S, Tang H, Kozon T, Ballinger D, Farrahi A (2013) Initial evaluation of a conflict detection tool in the terminal area. In: Landry SJ (ed) Advances in human aspects of aviation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 108–117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out as part of the PROSPERO project (Grant agreement No 314822 of Horizon 2020) in the period October 2012–2015. The prototypes of the ATM displays have been designed by Tim Kelley and Tony Nugent (Corbalis, Ireland) in accordance with the specifications provided by the authors. We would like to thank all the air traffic controllers for participating in the simulator session and the design review session.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Production Engineering and Management, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece

    Tom Kontogiannis

  2. Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority, Rhodes/Diagoras Int. Airport, Rhodes, Greece

    Stathis Malakis

  3. Centre for Innovative Human Systems, Trinity Dublin College, Dublin, Ireland

    Nick McDonald

Authors
  1. Tom Kontogiannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stathis Malakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nick McDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Kontogiannis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kontogiannis, T., Malakis, S. & McDonald, N. Integrating operational and risk information with system risk models in air traffic control. Cogn Tech Work 19, 345–361 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0409-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0409-3

Keywords