Abstract
Reconsidering the function allocation between automation and the pilot in the flight deck is the next step in improving aviation safety. The current allocation, based on who does what best, makes poor use of the pilot’s resources and abilities. In some cases, it may actually handicap pilots from performing their role. Improving pilot performance first lies in defining the role of the pilot—why a human is needed in the first place. The next step is allocating functions based on the needs of that role (rather than fitness), and then using automation to target specific human weaknesses in performing that role. Examples are provided (some of which could be implemented in conventional cockpits now). Along the way, the definition of human error and the idea that eliminating/automating the pilot will reduce instances of human error will be challenged.


Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Abbott TS (1989) Task-oriented display design: concept and example (Tech. Rep. No. 892230). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA
Abbott TS (2000) Task-oriented display design: the case of an engine-monitoring display. In: Sarter NB, Amalberti R (eds) Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Abbott TS, Rogers WH (1993) Functional categories for human-centered flight deck design. In: Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1993. 12th DASC. AIAA/IEEE. IEEE
Anderson KJ (1994) Impulsivity, caffeine, and task difficulty: a within-subjects test of the Yerkes–Dodson law. Personal Individ Differ 16(6):813–829
Aviation Safety Network http://aviation-safety.net/statistics/period/stats.php?cat=A1
Beach BE (1980) Line-oriented flight training. In: Cooper GE (ed) Resource management on the flightdeck. Proceedings of a NASA/Industry Workshop, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
Bhana H (2010) Trust but verify. Aero Saf World 5(5):13–14
Billings CE (1996) Human-centered aviation automation: principles and guidelines
Boeing Commercial Airplanes (2005) Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents worldwide operations 1959–2004. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle
Boeing Commercial Airplanes (2014) Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents worldwide operations 1959–2013. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle
Broadhurst PL (1959) A confirmation of the Yerkes–Dodson law and its relationship to emotionality in the rat. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 15:603–604
Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses (BEA) (1993) Official Report of the Commission of Investigation into the Accident on 20 January 1992 near Mont Sainte Odile (Bas-Rhin) of the Airbus A.320 Registered F-Gged Operated by Air Inter, Report Number BEA F-ED920120
Casner SM, Geven RW, Williams KT (2012) The effectiveness of airline pilot training for abnormal events. Hum Factors 55(3):477–485
Cataldo M, de Souza CRB (2014) Exploring the impact of API complexity on failure-proneness. In: 2014 IEEE 9th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE). IEEE
de Colombia AC (1996) Aircraft accident report: controlled flight into terrain, American Airlines flight 965, Boeing 757–223, N651AA near Cali, Colombia, 20 December 1995. Aeronautica Civil, Bogota, Colombia
Dismukes RK, Young GE, Sumwalt RL (1998) Cockpit interruptions and distractions: effective management requires a careful balancing act. ASRS Directline 10:4–9
et d’Analyses, Bureau d’Enquetes (2012) Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro–Paris. Ministère de l’Écologie. du Dévéloppement durable, des Transports et du Logement, Paris
Ferrucci D et al (2010) Building Watson: an overview of the DeepQA project. AI Mag 31(3):59–79
Funk K et al (1999) Flight deck automation issues. Int J Aviat Psychol 9(2):109–123
Gillespie JM (1947) We Flew the Atlantic ‘No Hands’. Popular Science
Google Inc (2016) Google Self-Driving Car Project Monthly Report June 2016 Mountain View
Hamman WR et al. (1993) The future of LOFT scenario design and validation (Line-Oriented Flight Training). In: International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 7th, Columbus
Jordan N (1963) Allocation of functions between man and machines in automated systems. J Appl Psychol 47(3):161
Kanki B, Helmreich R, Anca J (eds) (2010) Crew resource management. Academic Press, San Diego
Klein G (1997) The recognition-primed decision (RPD) model: looking back, looking forward. Nat Decis Mak 285–292
Maslow AH (1948) “Higher” and “lower” needs. J Psychol 25(2):433–436
Maslow AH, Frager R, Cox R, Fadiman J (1970) Motivation and personality, vol 2. Harper & Row, New York
National Transportation Safety Board (2010) Loss of Control on Approach, Colgan Air, Inc. Operating as Continental Connection Flight 3407 Bombardier DHC-8- 400, N200WQ, Clarence Center, New York, February 12, 2009. NTSB/AAR-10/01. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington
Neher A (1991) Maslow’s theory of motivation a critique. J Humanist Psychol 31(3):89–112
NTSB (2014) Descent below visual glidepath and impact with seawall: Asiana Airlines Flight 214, Boeing 777–200ER, HL7742, San Francisco, California, July 6, 2013. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington
Parasuraman R, Manzey DH (2010) Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration. Hum Factor J Hum Factor Ergon Soc 52(3):381–410
Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Factor J Hum Factor Ergon Soc 39(2):230–253
Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Singh IL (1993) Performance consequences of automation-induced’ complacency. Int J Aviat Psychol 3(1):1–23
Parasuraman R, Mouloua M, Molloy R, Hilburn B (1996) Monitoring of automated systems. In: Parasuraman R, Mouloua M (eds) Automation and human performance: theory and applications Mahwah. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersy, pp 91–116
Pope A (1909) An essay on criticism. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sarter NB, Woods DD (1995) How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum Factors J Hum Factor Ergon Soc 37(1):5–19
Sarter NB, Woods DD, Billings CE (1997) Automation surprises. Handb Hum Factor Ergon 2:1926–1943
Schutte P (1999) Complemation: an alternative to automation. J Inf Technol Impact 1(3):113–118
Schutte P, Goodrich K, Williams R (2016) Synergistic allocation of flight expertise on the flight deck (SAFEdeck): A design concept to combat mode confusion, complacency, and skill loss in the flight deck. In: 7th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Orlando
Skitka LJ, Mosier K, Burdick Mark D (2000) Accountability and automation bias. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52(4):701–717
Staal MA (2004) Stress, cognition, and human performance: a literature review and conceptual framework (NASA Tech. Memorandum 212824). NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
Wiener EL (1988) Cockpit automation. In: Wiener EL, Nagel DC (eds) Human Factors in Aviation. Academic, New York, pp 433–461
Wiener EL (1988b) Cockpit automation. In: Wiener EL, Nagel DC (eds) Human factors in aviation San Diego. Academic Press, Millbrae, pp 433–461
Wiener EL (1989) Human factors of advanced technology (glass cockpit) transport aircraft
Williard N et al (2013) Lessons learned from the 787 Dreamliner issue on lithium-ion battery reliability. Energies 6(9):4682–4695
Woods DD (1996) Decomposing automation: apparent simplicity, real complexity. In: Parasuraman R, Mouloua M (eds) Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey
Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908) The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comp Neurol Psychol 18(5):459–482
Zsambok CE, Klein G (2014) Naturalistic decision making. Psychology Press, New York, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schutte, P.C. How to make the most of your human: design considerations for human–machine interactions. Cogn Tech Work 19, 233–249 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0418-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0418-2