Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling drivers’ memory of daily repetitive stimuli in traffic scenes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Different memories of traffic scenes affect a driver’s visual search, driving behavior and traffic safety. The aim of the study was to examine how drivers’ memory changes during daily repetitive stimuli from traffic scenes, to provide a guide of driving times which can characterize drivers’ familiarity, and to explore whether there is a difference in memory characteristics between male drivers and female drivers. A driving simulator was used to collect data. Twenty licensed drivers were recruited to perform the experiments. The Driver’s Memory Scale for Traffic Scenes was designed to measure a driver’s memory. The negative exponential model was selected to model drivers’ memory of daily stimuli in traffic scenes. The saturation value of the driver’s memory for the traffic scene, i.e., the capacity of memory, and the memory growth coefficient were proposed to characterize drivers’ memory. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to conduct the significance tests. The results show that the average capacity and the average growth coefficient of drivers’ memory for the traffic scene were 0.86 and 0.54, respectively. Drivers’ memory increased over time, and rapid initial growth was followed by an asymptotic stability after a certain period of time, called steady time. The average steady time of drivers’ memory for the traffic scene was 7.6 times. The results also show that there was no statistically significant difference in the capacity, the growth coefficient, and the steady time of drivers’ memory for the traffic scene between male drivers and female drivers. The findings provide a theoretical reference for the related research on road familiarity and driving behavior. The findings also have potential applications in the familiarity training of a route for fixed route drivers and the familiarity training of search and rescue routes for firefighters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alm H, Nilsson L (1995) The effects of a mobile telephone taskon driver behavior in a car following situation. Accid Anal Prev 27:707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1968) Some speculations on storage and retrieval processes in long-term memory. Psychol Rev 76(2):775–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertola MA, Balk SA, Shurbutt J (2012) Evaluating driver performance on rural two-lane horizontal curved roadways using a driving simulator (No. FHWA-HRT- 12-073). Office of Safety Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA

  • Brickman AM, Stern Y (2009) Aging and memory in humans. Encycl Neurosci, pp175–180

  • Charlton SG, Starkey NJ (2013) Driving on familiar roads: automaticity and inattention blindness. Trans Research Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 19:121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colonna P, Intini P, Berloco N, Ranieri V (2016) The influence of memory on driving behavior: how route familiarity is related to speed choice an on-road study. Saf Sci 82:456–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diana RA, Reder LM, Arndt J, Park H (2006) Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual- process account. Psychon Bull Rev 13(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus H (1885) Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore LC, Ma WJ, Magnotti JF, Leising KJ, Passaro AD, Katz JS, Wright AA (2011) Visual short-term memory compared in rhesus monkeys and humans. Curr Biol 21:975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrier JH, Manivannan P, Nair SN (1999) The role of working memory, field dependence, visual search, and reaction time in the left turn performance of older female drivers. Appl Ergon 30(2):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugerty L, Tirre WC (2000) Individual differences in situation awareness. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ (eds) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 249–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman DL (1988) Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychol Rev 95(4):528–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintzman DL (2010) How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency. Mem Cognit 38(1):102–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intini P, Colonna P, Berloco N, Ranieri V (2017) Measuring trade-offs between risk and travel time based on experimental speed data. In: Advances in human aspects of transportation. Springer, pp 1103–1116

  • Intini P, Berloco N, Colonna P, Ranieri V, Ryeng E (2018) Exploring the relationships between drivers’ familiarity and two-lane rural road accidents. A multi-level study. Accid Anal Prev 111:280–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel ER (2001) The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 294:1030–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karkach A (2006) Trajectories and models of individual growth. Demogr Res 15(12):347–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke JD, Iii HLR (2007) Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. J Mem Lang 57(2):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke JD, Roediger HL (2008) The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 319(5865):966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai N, Matsuzawa T (2000) Cognition: numerical memory span in a chimpanzee. Nature 403:39–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light KR, Kolata S, Wass C, Denman-Brice A, Zagalsky R, Matzel LD (2010) Working memory training promotes general cognitive abilities in genetically heterogeneous mice. Curr Biol 20:777–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Ye TJ (2011) Run-off-road Crashes: an on-scene perspective (No. HS-811 500)

  • Mark FB, Barry C, Michael P (2007) Neuroscience: exploring the brain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens MH, Fox MR (2007) Do familiarity and expectations change perception? Drivers’ glances and response to changes. Trans Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 10(6):476–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaugh JL (1966) Time-dependent processes in memory storage. Science 153:1351–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Muller U (1996) Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates. Annu Rev Neurosci 19(19):379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panik MJ (2013) Growth curve modeling: theory and applications. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin CH, Abrams T, Barry RJ, Bhatnagar S, Clayton DF, Colombo J et al (2009) Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 92(2):135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom T, Perlman A, Shahar A (2007) Women drivers’ behavior in well-known versus less familiar locations. J Saf Res 38(3):283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg MD, Yonelinas AP (2003) Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cognit Sci 7(7):313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci DD, Beltowska J (2008) Effects of memory rehearsal on driver performance: experiment and theoretical account. Hum Factors 50(5):834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully T, Preat T, Boynton SC, Vecchio AMD (1994) Genetic dissection of consolidated memory in drosophila. Cell 79(1):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1962) Subjective organization in free recall of “unrelated” words. Psychol Rev 69(69):344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen F (2012) Cooperation and learning to increase the autonomy of ADAS. Cogn Technol Work 14(1):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen F, Carsten O (2017) Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems? Cogn Technol Work 19(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright AA, Katz JS, Magnotti J, Elmore LC, Babb S, Alwin S (2010) Testing pigeon memory in a change detection task. Psychon Bull Rev 17:243–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanko MR, Spalek TM (2013) Route familiarity breeds inattention: a driving simulator study. Accid Anal Prev 57:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas AP (1997) Recognition memory rocs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Mem Cogni 25(6):747–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partly supported by the Open Fund of Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic Engineering, College of Metropolitan Transportation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenlong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Li, Z., Cao, Z. et al. Modeling drivers’ memory of daily repetitive stimuli in traffic scenes. Cogn Tech Work 20, 389–399 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0476-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0476-0

Keywords