Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differences between beginning and advanced design students in analogical reasoning during idea generation: evidence from eye movements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In existing studies about analogical reasoning during idea generation in design, there is lack in quantitative and objective evidences showing the relationship between expertise and the analogy distance. To advance such a state, in this study 43 participants (beginning and advanced students) took part in a design task and their eye movements such as fixation time and saccades were compared. Besides, quantitative analysis of sketches and retrospective interviews were conducted to further explore the relationship between the analogy distance, the fixation level and expertise. The results showed that: (1) compared to advanced students who equally distributed their attention among the three analogy domains, beginning students fixed significantly more on distant domain, although they both used more near and medium analogies in their solutions; (2) beginning students markedly outperformed advanced students in both between-domain and within-domain saccades; (3) beginning students create more ideas and get into high-level design fixation, contrary to advanced students who create a small number of alternative ideas and perform a low level of design fixation. The results clearly offer more accurate and objective evidences showing significant relationships between the cognitive activities of analogical reasoning and expertise and analogy distance, which will bring greater clarity in using analogy in design and teaching analogical reasoning in design education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agogué M, Kazakçi A, Hatchuel A, Masson PL, Weil B, Poirel N et al (2014) The impact of type of examples on originality: explaining fixation and stimulation effects. J Creat Behav 48(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed S, Christensen BT (2009) An in situ study of analogical reasoning in novice and experienced design engineers. J Mech Des 131(11):111004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing LT (2003) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res Eng Des 14(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearman CR, Ball LJ, Ormerod TC (2002) An exploration of real-world analogical problem solving in novices. In: Gray WD, Schunn CD (eds) Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the cognitive science society. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilalić M, Mcleod P (2014) Why good thoughts block better ones. Sci Am 310(3):74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso C, Badke-Schaub P (2011) The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. J Creat Behav 45(2):130–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casakin H (2004) Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process. Expert versus novice performance. J Des Res 4(2):197–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Casakin H (2010) Visual analogy, visual displays, and the nature of design problems: the effect of expertise. Environ Plan 37(1):170–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casakin HP, Goldschmidt G (2000) Reasoning by visual analogy in design problem-solving: the role of guidance. Environ Plan 27(1):105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai C, Cen F, Ruan W, Yang C, Li H (2015) Behavioral analysis of analogical reasoning in design: differences among designers with different expertise levels. Des Stud 36:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan J, Fu K, Schunn C, Cagan J, Wood K, Kotovsky K (2011a) On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. J Mech Des 133(8):602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan J, Fu K, Schunn C, Cagan J, Wood K, Kotovsky K (2011) On the effective use of design-by-analogy: the influences of analogical distance and commonness of analogous designs on ideation performance. In: International conference on engineering design, ICED, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Chen C, Chan C-S (2008) Design cognition. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BT, Schunn CD (2007) The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design. Mem Cognit 35(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2007) Designerly ways of knowing. Des Stud 3(4):221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2011) Understanding how designers think and work. Berg Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubukcu E, Cetintahra GE (2010) Does analogical reasoning with visual clues affect novice and experienced design students’ creativity? Creat Res J 22(3):337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çubukçu E, Dündar ŞG (2007) Can creativity be taught? an empirical study on benefits of visual analogy in basic design education. ITU J Faculty Arch 4(2):67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J Mark Res 39(1):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchowski AT (2007) Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay JM, Gilchrist ID (2003) Active vision: the psychology of looking and seeing. J Neuroophthalmol 26(1):69–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS (1994) Computational models of creative design processes. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS, Maher ML (1993) Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G (2001) Visual analogy—a strategy for design reasoning and learning. In: Eastman CM, McCracken WM, Newstetter WC (eds) Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education. Elsevier, New York, pp 199–219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G (2015) Ubiquitous serendipity: potential visual design stimuli are everywhere. Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G, Smolkov M (2006) Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Des Stud 27(5):549–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves M (2017) Design finds a way: creative strategies to cope with barriers to creativity. In: International conference on engineering design

  • Gordon PC, Moser S (2007) Insight into analogies: evidence from eye movements. Vis Cognit 15(1):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant ER, Spivey MJ (2003) Eye movements and problem solving. Psychol Sci 14(5):462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han HC, Mi JK (2017) The effects of analogical and metaphorical reasoning on design thinking. Think Skills Creat 23:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak KJ, Morrison RGJ (2013) The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalogerakis K, Lüthje C, Herstatt C (2010) Developing innovations based on analogies: experience from design and engineering consultants. J Prod Innov Manag 27(3):418–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavakli M, Gero JS (2002) The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers. Des Stud 23(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowler E (2011) Eye movements: the past 25 years. Vis Res 51(13):1457–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang C, Lin CT, Yao SN, Chang WS, Liu YC, Chen SA (2017) Visual attention and association: an electroencephalography study in expert designers. Des Stud 48:76–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsey JS, Laux JP, Clauss E, Wood KL, Markman AB (2007) Increasing innovation: a trilogy of experiments towards a design-by-analogy method. Am Soc Mech Eng 4:145–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsey JS, Tseng I, Fu K, Cagan J, Wood KL, Schunn CD (2010) A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J Mech Des 132(4):041003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke T, Brook-Carter N, Parkes AM, Grimes E, Mills A (2006) An investigation of train driver visual strategies. Cogn Technol Work 8(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuthmann A, Smith TJ, Engbert R, Henderson JM (2010) Crisp: a computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychol Rev 117(2):382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orquin JL, Mueller LS (2013) Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 144(1):190–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkan O, Dogan F (2013) Cognitive strategies of analogical reasoning in design: differences between expert and novice designers. Des Stud 34(2):161–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo J, Christiaans H (2001) Problem structuring and information access in design. J Des Res 4(2):218–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch JL, Vogel-Walcutt JJ (2013) A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training. Cogn Technol Work 15(3):313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert PM (2007) Using sentence and picture clues to solve verbal insight problems. Creat Res J 19(2–3):293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Xiang W, Chai C, Yang Z, Zhang K (2014a) Designers’ perception during sketching: an examination of creative segment theory using eye movements. Des Stud 35(6):593–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Xiang W, Chai C, Wang C, Huang Q (2014b) Creative segment: a descriptive theory applied to computer-aided sketching. Des Stud 35(1):54–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syer CA, Jad-Moussa R, Pelletier S, Shore BM (2003) Adaptive-creative versus routine-reproductive expertise in hypermedia design: an exploratory study. Cogn Technol Work 5(2):94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut JP, French RM (2016) Analogical reasoning, control and executive functions: a developmental investigation with eye-tracking. Cogn Dev 38:10–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos LA, Cardoso CC, Sääksjärvi MC, Chen CC, Crilly N (2016) Inspiration and fixation: the influences of example designs and system properties in idea generation. J Mech Des 139(3):031101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan VK, Linsey JS (2013) Design fixation and its mitigation: a study on the role of expertise. J Mech Des 135(5):051008-1-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyas D, Veer GVD, Nijholt A (2013) Creative practices in the design studio culture: collaboration and communication. Cogn Technol Work 15(4):415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward TB (1994) Structured imagination: the role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cogn Psychol 27(1):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang W, Sun L, Chen S, Yang Z, Liu Z (2015) The role of mental models in collaborative sketching. Int J Technol Des Educ 25(1):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youmans RJ, Arciszewski T (2014) Design fixation: a cloak of many colors. design computing and cognition ‘12. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by The National Natural Science Research Foundation of China (No. 51435011, 51205262) and by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2016JY0237, 18ZDYF3189).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Yihuan Road, Chengdu, 610065, China

    Juan Cao, Yan Xiong, Yan Li, Longfan Liu & Mei Wang

Authors
  1. Juan Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Longfan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Xiong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, J., Xiong, Y., Li, Y. et al. Differences between beginning and advanced design students in analogical reasoning during idea generation: evidence from eye movements. Cogn Tech Work 20, 505–520 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0477-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0477-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation