Abstract
Self-driving vehicles are currently being developed in major industries for mass public deployment. Their benefits are attractive, and there is interest in having them on the streets as quickly as possible. Delegating responsibility to the cars has far-reaching impacts. As accidents will be unavoidable, the self-driving car will be asked to make life and death decisions that will impact human lives. However, the impact of machine decision making on the overall acceptance of self-driving cars in society is far from sufficiently addressed. The research presented here investigates three factors, i.e., technology, self-safety, and utilitarianism, and hypothesizes their link to self-driving car acceptance. Survey-collected data is statistically analyzed to assess the proposed hypotheses. The empirical outcome of this work shows that the three investigated factors contribute to the societal acceptance of self-driving cars, with technology being the major contributor while the ethical aspects (self-safety and utilitarianism) follow.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bansal P, Kockelman KM (2016) Are we ready to embrace connected and self-driving vehicles? a case study of texans. Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9745-z
Bansal P, Kockelman KM, Singh A (2016) Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: an austin perspective. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 67:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
BBC (2016) Tesla car drives owner to hospital after he suffers pulmonary embolism.https://goo.gl/CimvFn. Accessed 14 Mar 2020
Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2016) The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352(6293):1573–1576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2654
Borenstein J, Herkert J, Miller K (2017) Self-driving cars: ethical responsibilities of design engineers. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 36(2):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2017.2696600
Bremner P, Dennis LA, Fisher M, Winfield AF (2019) On proactive, transparent, and verifiable ethical reasoning for robots. Proc IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2019.2898267
Carsten P, Andel TR, Yampolskiy M, McDonald JT (2015) In-vehicle networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual cyber and information security research conference on—CISR’15. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2746266.2746267
Coca-Vila I (2017) Self-driving cars in dilemmatic situations: An approach based on the theory of justification in criminal law. Crim Law Philos. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-017-9411-3
de Sio FS (2017) Killing by autonomous vehicles and the legal doctrine of necessity. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9780-7
Ethik-Kommission (2017) Automatisiertes und vernetztes fahren. Technical report, Federal Ministry of Transport and DIgital Infrastructure, Germany, http://www.bmvi.de/bericht-ethikkommission. Accessed 14 Mar 2020
Fernandez-Rojas R, Perry A, Singh H, Campbell B, Elsayed S, Hunjet R, Abbass HA (2019) Contextual awareness in human-advanced-vehicle systems: a survey. IEEE Access 7:33304–33328. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2902812
Freitas JD, Anthony SE, Alvarez G (2019) Doubting driverless dilemmas. Psy ArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/a36e5
Guo J, Kurup U, Shah M (2019) Is it safe to drive? an overview of factors, metrics, and datasets for driveability assessment in autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2926042
Haboucha CJ, Ishaq R, Shiftan Y (2017) User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 78:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010
Hevelke A, Nida-Rümelin J (2014) Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: an ethical analysis. Sci Eng Ethics 21(3):619–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5
Hicks D, Simmons R (2019) The national robotics initiative: a five-year retrospective. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. https://doi.org/10.1109/mra.2019.2912860
Hohenberger C, Spörrle M, Welpe IM (2016) How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transp Res Part C Policy Pract. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.022
Hussain R, Zeadally S (2019) Autonomous cars: research results, issues, and future challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 21(2):1275–1313. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2018.2869360
IEEE (2018) Ethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems. http://standards.ieee.org/develop/indconn/ec/autonomous_systems.html. Accessed 14 Mar 2020
Johannesson P, Perjons E (2012) A design science primer. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley
Karnouskos S (2020) Self-driving car acceptance and the role of ethics. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 67(2):252–265. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2018.2877307
Karnouskos S, Kerschbaum F (2018) Privacy and integrity considerations in hyperconnected autonomous vehicles. Proc IEEE 106(1):160–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2017.2725339
Kyriakidis M, Happee R, de Winter J (2015) Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 32:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
Lin P (2015) Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. Autonomes Fahren. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_4
Li S, Sui PC, Xiao J, Chahine R (2019) Policy formulation for highly automated vehicles: emerging importance, research frontiers and insights. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 124:573–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.05.010
Malle BF, Scheutz M, Arnold T, Voiklis J, Cusimano C (2015) Sacrifice one for the good of many?: People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction—HRI ’15. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696458
Mordue G, Yeung A, Wu F (2020) The looming challenges of regulating high level autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 132:174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.007
Nees MA (2016) Acceptance of self-driving cars: an examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a self- driving car acceptance scale. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc 60(1):1449–1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601332
NTSB (2019a) Collision between vehicle controlled by developmental automated driving system and pedestrian tempe, Arizona March 18, 2018. https://ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HWY19FH008-preliminary.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2020
NTSB (2019b) Highway preliminary report: HWY19FH008. https://ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/HWY19FH008-preliminary-report.aspx. Accessed 14 Mar 2020
PWC (2016) Driving the future: understanding the new automotive consumer. Technical report, Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC). https://tinyurl.com/ugx334m
Rasouli A, Tsotsos JK (2019) Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: a survey of theory and practice. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2019.2901817
Rhim J, Lee G-B, Lee JH (2020) Human moral reasoning types in autonomous vehicle moral dilemma: a cross-cultural comparison of Korea and Canada. Comput Hum Behav 102:39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.010
Rödel C, Stadler S, Meschtscherjakov A, Tscheligi M (2014) Towards autonomous cars: the effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications—AutomotiveUI ’14. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667330
Shladover SE, Nowakowski C (2019) Regulatory challenges for road vehicle automation: lessons from the California experience. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 122:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.006
Sütfeld LR, Gast R, König P, Pipa G (2017) Using virtual reality to assess ethical decisions in road traffic scenarios: applicability of value-of-life-based models and influences of time pressure. Front Behav Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00122
Vanderelst D, Winfield A (2018) An architecture for ethical robots inspired by the simulation theory of cognition. Cogn Syst Res 48:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.04.002
Vdovic H, Babic J, Podobnik V (2019) Automotive software in connected and autonomous electric vehicles: a review. IEEE Access 7:166365–166379. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2953568
Zmud J, Sener IN, Wagner J (2016) Consumer acceptance and travel behavior impacts of automated vehicles. Technical report PRC 15-49 F, Texas A&M Transportation Institute. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/PRC-15-49-F.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karnouskos, S. The role of utilitarianism, self-safety, and technology in the acceptance of self-driving cars. Cogn Tech Work 23, 659–667 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00649-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00649-6