Skip to main content
Log in

On weighted lower and upper possibilistic means and variances of fuzzy numbers and its application in decision

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we define the weighted lower and upper possibilistic variances and covariances of fuzzy numbers. We also obtain their many properties similar to variance and covariance in probability theory. On the basis of the weighted lower and upper possibilistic means and variances, we present two new possibilistic portfolio selection models with tolerated risk level and holdings of assets constraints. The conventional probabilistic mean–variance model can be transformed to a linear programming problem under possibility distributions. Finally, an estimation method of possibility distribution is offered and a real example for portfolio selection problem is given to illustrate the usability of the approach and the effectiveness of our methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Best MJ, Grauer RR (1990) The efficient set mathematics when mean–variance problems are subject to general linear constrains. J Econ Bus 42: 105–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Best MJ, Hlouskova J (2000) The efficient frontier for bounded assets. Math Methods Oper Res 52: 195–212

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Carlsson C, Fullér R (2001) On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122: 315–326

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlsson C, Fullér R, Majlender P (2002) A possibilistic approach to selecting portfolios with highest utility score. Fuzzy Sets Syst 131: 13–21

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong WM, Wong FS (1987) Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21: 183–199

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois D, Prade H (1987) The mean value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets Syst 24: 279–300

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fullér R, Majlender P (2003) On weighted possibilistic mean and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 136: 363–374

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Giove S, Funari S, Nardelli C (2006) An interval portfolio selection problems based on regret function. Eur J Oper Res 170: 253–264

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo P, Zeng DZ, Shishido H (2002) Group decision with inconsistent knowledge. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 32: 670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Intan R, Mukaidono M (2004) Fuzzy conditional probability relations and their applications in fuzzy information systems. Knowl Inf Syst 6: 345–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Inuiguchi M, Tanino T (2000) Portfolio selection under independent possibilistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115: 83–92

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai KK, Wang SY et al (2002) A class of linear interval programming problems and its application to portfolio selection. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10: 698–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. León T, Liem V, Vercher E (2002) Viability of infeasible portfolio selection problems: a fuzzy approach. Eur J Oper Res 139: 178–189

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu L, Shenoy C, Shenoy PP (2006) Knowledge representation and integration for portfolio evaluation using linear belief functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 36: 774–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu XW (2006) On the maximum entropy parameterized interval approximation of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157: 869–878

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Luhandjula MK (1987) Multiple objective programming problems with possibilistic coefficients. Fuzzy Sets Syst 21: 135–145

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7: 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Markowitz H (1987) Analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Merton RC (1972) An analytic derivation of the efficient frontier. J Financ Quant Anal 9: 1851–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pang JS (1980) A new efficient algorithm for a class of portfolio selection problems. Oper Res 28: 754–767

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Perold AF (1984) Large-scale portfolio optimization. Manage Sci 30: 1143–1160

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance 19: 425–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka H, Guo P (1999) Portfolio selection based on upper and lower exponential possibility distributions. Eur J Oper Res 114: 115–126

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka H, Guo P, Türksen IB (2000) Portfolio selection based on fuzzy probabilities and possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 111: 387–397

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Truck I, Akdag H (2006) Manipulation of qualitative degrees to handle uncertainty: formal models and applications. Knowl Inf Syst 9(4): 385–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vörös J (1986) Portfolio analysis: an analytic derivation of the efficient portfolio frontier. Eur J Oper Res 23: 294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang SY, Zhu SS (2002) On fuzzy portfolio selection problems. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 1: 361–377

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Watada J (1997) Fuzzy portfolio selection and its applications to decision making. Tatra Mt Math Publ 13: 219–248

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiong N, Litz L, Ressom H (2002) Learning premises of fuzzy rules for knowledge acquisition in classification problems. Knowl Inf Syst 4: 96–111

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8: 338–353

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang WG, Liu WA, Wang YL (2005) A class of possibilistic portfolio selection models and algorithms. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3828: 464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang WG, Liu WA, Wang YL (2006) On admissible efficient portfolio selection: Models and algorithms. Appl Math Comput 176: 208–218

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang WG, Nie ZK (2003) On possibilistic variance of fuzzy numbers. Lect Notes Artif Intell 2639: 398–402

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang WG, Nie ZK (2004) On admissible efficient portfolio selection problem. Appl Math Comput 159: 357–371

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang WG, Wang YL (2005) Portfolio selection: possibilistic mean–variance model and possibilistic efficient frontier. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3521: 203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang WG, Wang YL (2005) Using fuzzy possibilistic mean and variance in portfolio selection model. Lect Notes Artif Intell 3801: 291–296

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang WG, Wang YL (2006) An analytic derivation of admissible efficient frontier with borrowing. Eur J Oper Res 184(1): 229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang WG, Wang YL, Chen ZP, Nie ZK (2007) Possibilistic mean–variance models and efficient frontiers for portfolio selection problem. Inf Sci 177: 2787–2801

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Guo Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, WG., Xiao, WL. On weighted lower and upper possibilistic means and variances of fuzzy numbers and its application in decision. Knowl Inf Syst 18, 311–330 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-008-0133-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-008-0133-7

Keywords

Navigation