Skip to main content
Log in

A new order relation for Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new order relation for Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (PFNs) and applies to multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM). The main contributions are outlined as five aspects: (1) the concepts of relative distance and information reliability of PFN are proposed. Then, a new order relation is developed to compare PFNs. Moreover, the new order relation of PFNs is demonstrated to be an admissible order. (2) Knowledge measure of PFN is defined to describe the amount of information. The desirable properties of knowledge measure of PFN are studied concretely. (3) For MAGDM with PFNs, the comprehensive distance between individual Pythagorean fuzzy matrices and a mean one are defined. Then, the decision makers’ weights are obtained by the comprehensive distances. Thus, a collective Pythagorean fuzzy matrix is derived by using the Pythagorean fuzzy weighted average operator. (4) To determine attribute weights, a multi-objective programming model is constructed by maximizing the overall knowledge measure of each alternative. This model is further transformed into a single-objective mathematical program to resolve. (5) According to the defined new order relation of PFNs, the ranking order of alternatives is generated by the comprehensive values of alternatives. Therefore, a new method is proposed to solve MAGDM with PFNs. Finally, an example of venture capital investment selection is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Set Syst 20(1):87–96

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov K (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: theory and applications. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Afful-Dadzie E, Afful-Dadzie A, Oplatková ZK (2017) Assessing commercial viability of technology start-up businesses in a government venture capital under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(2):400–413

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aouni B, Colapinto C, La Torre D (2014) A fuzzy goal programming model for venture capital investment decision making. INFOR 52(3):138–146

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Afful-Dadzie E, Afful-Dadzie A (2015) A decision making model for selecting start-up businesses in a government venture capital scheme. Manag Decis 54:714–734

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bustince H, Barrenechea E, Pagola M et al (2016) A historical account of types of fuzzy sets and their relationships. IEEE T Fuzzy Syst 24(1):179–194

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bustince H, Fernandez J, Kolesárová A et al (2013) Generation of linear orders for intervals by means of aggregation functions. Fuzzy Set Syst 220:69–77

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen T (2018) Remoteness index-based Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR methods with a generalized distance measure for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf Fusion 41:129–150

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen S, Cheng S, Lan T (2016) Multi-criteria decision making based on the TOPSIS method and similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf Sci 367–368:279–295

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng X, Gu J, Xu Z (2018) Venture capital group decision-making with interaction under probabilistic linguistic environment. Knowl-Based Syst 140:82–91

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dong J, Wan S (2016) Virtual enterprise partner selection integrating LINMAP and TOPSIS. J Oper Res Soc 67(10):1288–1308

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao H (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35:2229–2245

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garg H, Kumar K (2018) A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9668-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garg H (2018) Hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and its applications to multi-attribute decision making process. Int J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg H (2016) A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(1):529–540

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Garg H (2016) A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):886–920

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garg H (2017) Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm for multicriteria decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garg H (2018) A linear programming method based on an improved score function for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and its application to decision-making. Int J Uncertain Fuzz 26(1):67–80

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Garg H (2016) A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems. Appl Soft Comput 38(5):988–999

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garg H (2017) A novel improved accuracy function for interval valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in the decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garg H (2017) Confidence levels based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its application to decision-making process. Comput Math Organ Theory 23:546–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-017-9242-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garg H (2017) Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng Appl Artif Intell 60:164–174

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garg H (2018) Some methods for strategic decision-making problems with immediate probabilities in Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Int J Intell Syst 33(4):687–712

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garg H (2018) Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric interactive aggregation operators using Einstein operations and their application to decision making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 30(6):763–794

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garg H (2016) A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision-making processes. Int J Intell Syst 31(12):1234–1253

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khaista R, Saleem A, Rehan A et al (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:635–647

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang D, Xu Z, Liu D et al (2018) Method for three-way decisions using ideal TOPSIS solutions at Pythagorean fuzzy information. Inf Sci 435:282–295

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Z, Wei G, Mao L (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy Hamy mean operators in multiple attribute group decision making and their application to supplier selection. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10100505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Luis P, Luis Alberto P, Alejandro A et al (2018) MOORA under Pythagorean fuzzy set for multiple criteria decision making. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2602376

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma Z, Xu Z (2016) Symmetric Pythagorean fuzzy weighted Geometric/Averaging operators and their application in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Int J Intell Syst 12:1198–1219

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peng X, Dai J (2017) Approaches to Pythagorean fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria decision making based on prospect theory and regret theory with new distance measure and score function. Int J Intell Syst 32(11):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peng X, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30(11):1133–1160

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Qin JD (2018) Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric means and its application to multiple attribute sir group decision model. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(3):943–957

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Ren P, Xu Z, Gou X (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 42:246–259

    Google Scholar 

  35. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (1996) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Notes IFS 2(1):11–14

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (2009) Amount of information and its reliability in the ranking of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives. In: Rakus-Andersson E et al (eds) Recent Advances in Decision Making. Springer, Berlin, pp 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  37. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J, Bujnowski P (2011) Measuring the amount of knowledge for Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: International conference on fuzzy logic and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–24

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J, Bujnowski P (2014) How to measure the amount of knowledge conveyed by Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 257:276–285

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Tian X, Xu Z, Gu J et al (2017) How to select a promising enterprise for venture capitalists with prospect theory under intuitionistic fuzzy circumstance? Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wan S, Jin Z, Dong J (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy mathematical programming method for multi-attribute group decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy truth degrees. Knowl Inf Syst 55:437–466

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wan S, Jin Z, Wang F (2017) A new ranking method for Pythagorean fuzzy numbers. In: International conference on intelligent systems and knowledge engineering (ISKE), pp 1–6

  42. Wan S, Li S, Dong J (2018) A three-phase method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making and application to haze management. Comput Ind Eng 123:348–363

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wan S, Li D (2014) Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(2):300–312

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Wan S, Wang F, Dong J (2016) A preference degree for intuitionistic fuzzy values and application to multiattribute group decision making. Inf Sci 370–371:127–146

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Wei GW (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:2119–2132

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Wei G, Lu M (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(11):1043–1070

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wei G, Lu M (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(1):169–186

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wei G, Wang H, Lin R (2011) Application of correlation coefficient to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight information. Knowl Inf Syst 26(2):337–349

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wei G, Wei Y (2018) Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 32(2):634–652

    Google Scholar 

  50. Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xue W, Xu Z, Zhang X et al (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy LINMAP method based on the entropy theory for railway project investment decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(1):93–125

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28(5):436–452

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yang M, Zahid H (2018) Fuzzy entropy for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with application to multicriterion decision making. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2832839

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang W, Shi J, Liu Y et al (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy interaction partitioned Bonferroni mean operators and their application in multiple-attribute decision-making. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3606245

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhao Y, Yang Y (2018) Modified PROMETHEEII for venture capital investment selection decision-making towards SMEs. J Interdiscip Math 21(4):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Zeng S (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy multiattribute group decision making with probabilistic information and OWA approach. Int J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zeng S, Cao C, Deng Y et al (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation based on weighted induced operator and its application to R&D projections selection. Informatica 29(3):567–580

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zeng S, Chen J, Li X (2016) A hybrid method for Pythagorean Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making. Int J Inf Tech Decis. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622016500012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zeng W, Li D, Yin Q (2018) Distance and similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang X (2016) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(6):593–611

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang X (2016) Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Inf Sci 330:104–124

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang X (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy clustering analysis: a hierarchical clustering algorithm with the ratio index-based ranking methods. Int J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(12):1061–1078

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang R, Wang J, Zhu X et al (2017) Some generalized Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operators with their application to multiattribute group decision-making. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5937376

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71740021, 11861034, 11461030 and 71661010), the Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi Province Educational Department of China (No. GJJ180946), “Thirteen five” Programming Project of Jiangxi province Social Science (Nos. 18GL13, 17GL33 and 16GL08) and the Jiangxi Provincial Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project (No. JC162020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Jin.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, SP., Jin, Z. & Dong, JY. A new order relation for Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making. Knowl Inf Syst 62, 751–785 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-019-01369-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-019-01369-8

Keywords

Navigation